|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 24 - General Discussions Everything about the brand new 2023 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB, the MLBPA and the KBO. |
| View Poll Results: Who Wins the Cy Young? | |||
| Player 1 |
|
31 | 81.58% |
| Player 2 |
|
7 | 18.42% |
| Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Planet Texas
Posts: 1,643
|
Who Wins My CY?
EDIT:
P1 was 35 year old Pedro Martinez of the Taiwan Explosive Go Salmon (winner) P2 was 33 year old Jacob deGrom of the Galveston Greyhounds ~~~ Player 1 (red) has been his team's #1 starter all year. Player 2 (gray) has been his team's #2 starter all year (yes, different team). Both players' teams are division winners. So - who is it gonna be? Please explain your vote - I like to hear the reasoning.
__________________
Managing and rebuilding the 100-loss BURBANK BLACK BARONS. Defeated the TAIWAN EXPLOSIVE GO SALMON (99-63) in seven games to win the WORLD SERIES! Last edited by texasmame; 08-28-2023 at 08:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,482
|
I'm going with pitcher 1, but I went back and forth a bit.
51/49 in favor of #1. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Laurelton, NY
Posts: 590
|
I went with #1 due to the quality starts, babip & success at keeping the ball in the park.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2,339
|
Player 1 due to quality starts,
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In A Van Down By The River
Posts: 2,711
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
That K total is impressive but I'll have to go with the consensus and say #1.
He had a better overall season. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,445
|
Based on what's shown, #2. Though its tough without two of the most important stats that I would want to see (K%-BB% and xFIP). To me it looks like #2 was a lot better than #1, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 2,978
|
I think it’s relatively close between them. Hard to ignore those strikeouts. But hard to ignore those HR allowed. Player #1 marginally better on WHIP and FIP. Also, a #1 SP tends to match up with other #1 SP, so more of a challenge, more close games. I like the first guy.
__________________
Pelican OOTP 2020-? ”Hard to believe, Harry.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,612
|
They're tied by WAR but I'd go with #1 because of the consistency and the WINS
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 521
|
For me this is the most difficult type of case to settle in real life. Pitchers with similar WAR but one with lower SIERA and the other with lower HR%. I'm inclined to go with pitcher number 2, but it is as close as it gets to a tossup.
That said, I'm not sure if OOTP can be trusted with complex statistics given the limitations of the game engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 740
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Since 1980, 326 strikeouts in a season has only been exceeded by Randy Johnson. Given how similar so many of their numbers are, I'd vote guy #2 just based on the strikeouts really being a somewhat historical feat.
There's no wrong answer though. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Planet Texas
Posts: 1,643
|
Quote:
That's plenty of Ks! In fact, in my league (17 seasons as of now) Pedro Martinez set the record for Ks in a season with 357 in the 8th season. The total of 326 that Player #2 has is second only to that Pedro total.
__________________
Managing and rebuilding the 100-loss BURBANK BLACK BARONS. Defeated the TAIWAN EXPLOSIVE GO SALMON (99-63) in seven games to win the WORLD SERIES! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,740
|
Yes, impressive number of K's. But K's are only one way in which to get a batter out (although a decisive one for sure). When all is said and done, it's the guy who was more effective getting outs (and, conversely, not giving up runs ... such as home runs!). For that reason, I too went with Player #1.
__________________
- Bru |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,445
|
Looks like we're adding Pitcher #1 to the list alongside Colon and Welsh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,482
|
Quote:
Colon/Welch won primarily on the back of a sexy win total, with inferior peripherals compared to the alternatives. That's pretty clearly not the case here. Pitcher 1 has excellent peripherals across the board. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
|
Pitcher #2 by the slightest of margins.
3 extra games thrown and 17 extra IP was ultimately the deciding factor. I would not be upset with either pitcher winning assuming these are in fact the best two candidates. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 740
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Quote:
No wrong answer here. The fact that the strikeouts total is kind of historic for me is what gives #2 my vote. It's not just that it's "a lot of strikeouts", but to be able to say that's the most single season strikes in the last 45 years, outside of Randy Johnson..... it kind of takes on a historical thing at that point. With all of the other numbers being as good as they are for both guys - to say #2 kind of made history, that gives him my vote. It's baseball - making statistical history is always fun. Last edited by md40022; 08-20-2023 at 09:44 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Planet Texas
Posts: 1,643
|
Bump for great justice.
__________________
Managing and rebuilding the 100-loss BURBANK BLACK BARONS. Defeated the TAIWAN EXPLOSIVE GO SALMON (99-63) in seven games to win the WORLD SERIES! |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,522
|
Ment to vote for 1 but hit 2.
Yeah the high strikeout isnt really enough. Just means a pitcher is taking longer to accomplish and out. How many of those strikeouts involved a long at bat resulting in the pitcher wearing down faster? To me the first pitcher seemed to get the job done faster and was more consistent overall. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,345
|
I went with #1, mostly for "old-school" reasons: More wins, significantly better ERA. #2's K's are whoppingly impressive, but #1 is no slouch in that department. Significant edge to #1 in quality starts, which speaks to consistency.
What struck me is that one of the stats I looked for - and didn't find - was complete games (also not shown is shutouts). A sign of the times, I suppose (41 different statistics shown, and no CG or ShO... wow). Maybe these guys - neither of whom managed to average 7 ip per start - didn't have any of those... |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Planet Texas
Posts: 1,643
|
Quote:
__________________
Managing and rebuilding the 100-loss BURBANK BLACK BARONS. Defeated the TAIWAN EXPLOSIVE GO SALMON (99-63) in seven games to win the WORLD SERIES! |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|