Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Out of the Park Baseball 18 > OOTP 18 - General Discussions

OOTP 18 - General Discussions Everything about the 2017 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2017, 03:58 PM   #1
Midge888
Minors (Rookie Ball)
 
Midge888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 21
Team with losing record wins World Series

Not sure how often people see something like this but it shows how the playoffs can be a bit of a lottery. Seattle won their division with a 80-82 record, then beat a wild card team before taking the Divisional series. They won the ALCS by beating the 104-game winning Orioles and finally took the WS in 6 games.
Attached Images
Image 
Midge888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2017, 07:10 PM   #2
r0nster
Hall Of Famer
 
r0nster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,082
nearly happened with the KC royals in 1984 as far as winning the division as they were bearly above .500
r0nster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2017, 02:40 PM   #3
NoOne
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,273
Infractions: 0/1 (3)
cardinals were 82-80 in 2006. those bas%$rds! (lol, detroit is the rodney dangerfield of sports)

that was THE year! ..worse than choking against boston.. %#$ #$% 82-80 team! shouldn't even be allowed in the playoffs!

<ahem>

anyway, i don't think a sub-.500 has done it in RL but it can definitely happen - google can answer that, if interested... more liekly now than ever before. at some point if they keep expanding it might hurt the chances? too many series to win = lower % even with more opportunities? maybe?

Last edited by NoOne; 12-29-2017 at 02:41 PM.
NoOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2017, 03:34 PM   #4
stl jason
Hall Of Famer
 
stl jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOne View Post
cardinals were 82-80 in 2006. those bas%$rds! (lol, detroit is the rodney dangerfield of sports)

that was THE year! ..worse than choking against boston.. %#$ #$% 82-80 team! shouldn't even be allowed in the playoffs!

<ahem>

anyway, i don't think a sub-.500 has done it in RL but it can definitely happen - google can answer that, if interested... more liekly now than ever before. at some point if they keep expanding it might hurt the chances? too many series to win = lower % even with more opportunities? maybe?

hey now... don't sell that Cards team short...


they won 83 games that year (83-78... one rain-out never got replayed as it wouldn't have made a difference)
stl jason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2017, 04:10 PM   #5
joefromchicago
Hall Of Famer
 
joefromchicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,726
The 1973 Mets went 82-79 and won the NL pennant by beating the Reds (99-63). The Mets then lost to the A's in the WS. That's the closest that any major league has come to having a sub-.500 team win it all.
joefromchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2017, 04:45 PM   #6
bwburke94
Hall Of Famer
 
bwburke94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midge888 View Post
Seattle won their division with a 80-82 record, then beat a wild card team before taking the Divisional series.
Something about that statement seems... wrong. Two things, actually.
bwburke94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2017, 04:19 PM   #7
krownroyal83
All Star Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 1,003
In my fictional league a team with a 23-31 record made it to the finals, beating a 33-21 team in a best of 5 series 3-0 before taking on the top seed team with a record of 35-19 and beating them 3-1 in a best of 5 series. They would fall short in the finals in the best of 7 series losing 4-2, but I was pretty impressed.
krownroyal83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 12:36 PM   #8
NoOne
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,273
Infractions: 0/1 (3)
4 team division is much more likely to have 4 bad teams than a 6 team division having 6 bad teams. so, smaller (or more) divisions makes this more likely to occur. of course, more playoff slots makes it likely too... just look at the NHL.

this can definitely happen in real life and will, eventually.

side note: how the heck can a pro league allow more than half the teams into the playoffs like the NHL. i'm a fan of the wings, but their playoff streak pales in comparison to other major pro sports teams for this exact reason. 25 is more like 12-18 in other leagues, by some neutralized %chance of "making it" per league to compare apples to apples.
NoOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 08:17 PM   #9
Brad K
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOne View Post
...
side note: how the heck can a pro league allow more than half the teams into the playoffs like the NHL.
Playoff ticket money.

Playoff souvenir money.

Playoff TV money.

Last edited by Brad K; 01-01-2018 at 08:26 PM.
Brad K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 08:25 PM   #10
Brad K
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: St Petersburg Florida USA
Posts: 6,693
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoOne View Post
4 team division is much more likely to have 4 bad teams than a 6 team division having 6 bad teams. so, smaller (or more) divisions makes this more likely to occur. of course, more playoff slots makes it likely too... just look at the NHL.

Also scheduling. I see little point in having a division unless a team plays all or most of its games against division opponents. Because when teams play "everyone" and there are wild cards too divisions mean little. They just obscure the reality, which is they might as well throw every team into one group and take the top x number of teams for the playoffs. Because that's what's happening.
Brad K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2018, 09:14 PM   #11
TheMaus2
All Star Starter
 
TheMaus2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The OOTP Forums. Always.
Posts: 1,951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad K View Post
Also scheduling. I see little point in having a division unless a team plays all or most of its games against division opponents. Because when teams play "everyone" and there are wild cards too divisions mean little. They just obscure the reality, which is they might as well throw every team into one group and take the top x number of teams for the playoffs. Because that's what's happening.
In basketball, yes. I don't know about everyone else, though.
__________________
I write a monthly newsletter on the Food Baseball Association.

I also listen to music no one's ever heard of in hopes of looking cool and alternative.
TheMaus2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2018, 04:54 AM   #12
bwburke94
Hall Of Famer
 
bwburke94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMaus2 View Post
In basketball, yes. I don't know about everyone else, though.
I suppose that's why the NBA more-or-less ditched divisions.
bwburke94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2018, 12:46 PM   #13
dpd376
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 104
Texas was leading the AL West with 52-62 in 1994 when the strike started. I wish that disaster had been aloud to continue.

They would have had to go back to four division champs only (preferably with no inter-league and an unbalanced schedule between divisions). Unlike the NBA a short series in baseball is pretty much a crap shoot.
__________________
"I hate astroturf, but I love the game astroturf produces."
Bill James
dpd376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2018, 09:00 AM   #14
bwburke94
Hall Of Famer
 
bwburke94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpd376 View Post
They would have had to go back to four division champs only (preferably with no inter-league and an unbalanced schedule between divisions).
Let's hope you meant four overall, not four per league...
bwburke94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2018, 06:10 PM   #15
dpd376
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 104
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwburke94 View Post
Let's hope you meant four overall, not four per league...
I meant total, two per league.
__________________
"I hate astroturf, but I love the game astroturf produces."
Bill James
dpd376 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:21 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments