|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 14 - General Discussions Discuss the new 2013 version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,380
|
strange roster/transaction happenings
In doing some testing and goofing around (historical) in order to familiarize myself with OOTP 14 (before converting from v12), I came across a couple of strange things: FIRST ISSUE In the last week of the 1966 season the NL race is tight, so I check to see what pitching matchups are coming up. When looking at the Dodgers rotation I see that they only have 8 pitchers on the active roster. Perranoski and Singer are on the DL, so that explains part of it. But I’m wondering where the reserve-roster types are. I check the free agents list and find that guys like John Purdin and Mike Kekich are there, and further research indicates that OOTP had the Dodgers release both of them on 1/1/1966. In reality, Purdin and Kekich appeared for a few games on the Dodgers in 1965, then spent the 1966 season entirely in the Dodger’s minor-league organization (before reappearing on the Dodgers in later years). I’m assuming OOTP's Real Transactions module will have these two players – and others – re-sign with the Dodgers just prior to the season in which they make their major league reappearances. However, this doesn’t seem right. This sort of logic strips a team of its minor-league or reserve roster depth. This seems to be a change from v12, where - when using real transactions - you can still end up with a well-stocked Triple-A level after a few years. When I (hopefully) convert from v12 to v14, will it be possible to use in v14 the transactions file I am currently using in v12 in order to avoid this depletion scenario? SECOND ISSUE After the Dodgers survived a 3-way tie for first, they moved on to the World Series. After the first two games (pitched by Moeller and Sutton, as Koufax and Drysdale pitched in the NL playoff games), I looked to see the state of LA’s staff. I found that all starters were either exhausted or tired (granted, I had yet to advance to the next day, which will be an off day between games 2 and 3). So, looking individually to see just how tired these guys were, I noticed that both Sutton and Osteen were exhausted from pitching "today." Here’s where it gets weird… Sutton threw nine innings of game two, so of course he was tired. However, Osteen did not pitch. In fact, Osteen had not pitched since 1965 - and that was just one game (see attachments). Two things here jump out as odd:
Last edited by thehef; 12-09-2013 at 04:12 PM. Reason: grammar |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,380
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|