|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#101 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
|
Drew should be signed today-Monday. Now that the arb period is done, and the Dodgers were contractually forbidden from offering Arb, there is no lost draft pick to sign him. The agreed upon figured by the press appears to be 4/56 with a 5th yr option.
Assuming they sign DM, that alone would make this the best FA season possible. I had Drew and DM has the best position player and SP on the market this year. Getting them both is a bit of coup, imho. Winter meetings start tomorrow. Something will happen on the trade front. A few GMs have stated they expect the next week to be busy.
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP |
|
|
|
|
|
#102 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: dirty jerz
Posts: 1,339
|
Looks like Lugo did get arbitration though, unfortunately.
Sox offered Foulke arbitration but he's expected to decline. This on Trot from the Globe: Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#103 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lufkin, TX
Posts: 2,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#104 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 225
|
I'm surprised that the Sox didn't offer arbitration. It seemed like a win-win situation to me. If he declined they would have gotten a draft pick. If he accepted they would have gotten a single year of service from a talented, but oft-injured outfielder (if the Drew signing happens, outfield depth ought to be a priority).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#105 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 10,850
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#106 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 10,850
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#107 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#108 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Here
Posts: 6,156
|
I wonder at what point today Borat (sorry Boras) will waiver. I'm reckoning at some point when Epstein and co are on their way to Lucchino's plane.
It's surely to Boras' advantage that Matsuzaka signs this year. If I was Mat and ended up being sent back to the Lions I wouldn't appoint Boras as my agent for next year's posting frenzy, and then he would lose out on him when he next becomes a free agent I would guess (burnt bridges and all that stuff) I'm never a fan of agents. Jeez, if I was offered $6m a year but my agent said to hold out for $12m, I'd just take the $6m - any normal person could easily live on $100,000 a week (in fact most live on less than that a year) If he does return to Japan, which I doubt will happen (Boras must have learnt from the Varitek and Weaver dealings), should the Sox put the $51,111,111.11 towards getting Zito and Clemens? |
|
|
|
|
|
#109 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,616
|
This is the real problem with agents. Boras wants to get the big contract to Daisuke so that his other player, Barry Zito, can then leverage his value based on that. It actually benefits Boras more if Matsuzaka doesn't sign than if he signs what would perceived to be below market value. The Seibu Lions are kinda screwed (although they do get Daisuke back for a year so there's always that), Daisuke himself is a little screwed, but Boras makes out fairly well. Yet another in the long list of reasons why this guy is the worst agent in pro sports. He must be the best BSer in the free world because that's the only way I can think of that players continue to allow him to represent them.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#110 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
|
JS: Seriously? The guy consistently gets the best contracts for his clients. Isn't that his job?
I think most teams had believed that DM would sign for ~$8mm (this may seem odd, but rival bidders were quoted in [IIRC, the NY Post] as such whene there was discussion over what constitutes a "good faith" argument). Thus, if he signs for $10mm, Boras just increased his clients pay day by 25%. That is some real value added.
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP |
|
|
|
|
|
#112 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
|
Quote:
... caveat: if true.
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#113 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,008
|
There's no excuse for the Sox not getting it done at this point if that's true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#114 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
|
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP |
|
|
|
|
|
#115 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: somewhere where I don't know where I am
Posts: 3,251
|
The first link isn't working for me, but the second is. I'm more optimistic now than I was when I drove to work today.
I'm assuming the first link is to the story where the Sox offered $8mm and Boras/DM want $11mm. I can understand why the Sox were wavering on that, but it's probably worth it, if that is the deal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#116 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: dirty jerz
Posts: 1,339
|
You can follow the progress of the flight right here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#117 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: , "
Posts: 3,082
|
Heyman now reports 5/52 with incentives up to 6/60 on cnnsi.
__________________
Brookline Maccabees. RIP |
|
|
|
|
|
#118 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: somewhere where I don't know where I am
Posts: 3,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#119 | |||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,616
|
Quote:
My issue here isn't so much that Boras is highballing the Sox, or that he doesn't want them to consider the sunk cost of the payout to the Lions, it's that from what I've read he's refused to negotiate, period. Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#120 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: dirty jerz
Posts: 1,339
|
On a side note, I'm not that thrilled with this news:
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|