Which Team to BE??

Klew1986 · 05-12-2005, 07:56 PM

Please pick one of the three choices I should I be for my solo dynasty. And tell why you chose them.

To help you decide, I will be using Halofan's most recent update (4/9).

Anti-Dye · 05-12-2005, 08:14 PM

didnt u hav this pole b4? thats dum u shuld just pic 1 teem n stic w/it kthxbye

Mike D · 05-12-2005, 08:16 PM

None, maybe the the Draft Dodgers.

Matt from TN · 05-12-2005, 08:29 PM

Since we're talking about modern rosters, I say the Twins. They have the small market challenge & potentially some interestnig youngsters. Frankly, the Astros are boring. However, if you wanted to "rebuild," that might be the way to go since they're relatively old.

cubuff38 · 05-12-2005, 08:51 PM

I say the Astros.

They have an interesting blend now of quite old talent such as Clemens, Biggio, Bagwell (though dunno if you can call him talent anymore) as well as some good young guys and some killer young arms.

Plus, Astros have always been a favorite of mine for some reason though I hate every other team in the state of Texas. They are a team in flux right now and in real life they suck.

I'll give ya a read either way though.

metsgeek · 05-12-2005, 09:17 PM

Let's go Mets! We need a good Mets dynasty

I'd do one if I wasn't already running two.

tward13 · 05-12-2005, 10:07 PM

Mets. Because I'm a Mets fan.

The Mike! · 05-13-2005, 01:24 AM

Mets are too easy. They automaticly have enough to buy any player, after the first year you'd be set to win without fail.

UngratefulDead · 05-13-2005, 02:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Mike!

Mets are too easy. They automaticly have enough to buy any player, after the first year you'd be set to win without fail.

Just like those real Mets..

congobeast · 05-13-2005, 11:49 AM

I'm with Matt. The Twins have the small market challenge that keeps things interesting. Payroll constraints IRL, suck. In-game- excellent.

Edit:
I think I'd consider the Royals too, for the same reason.
Not sure why, but I also have a thing for wanting to see old "Mac the Ninth" succeed too.

YankeeFanatic04 · 05-14-2005, 11:18 AM

Who cares your not going to stick with it like the other ones u started.

View Poll Results: Which Team Should I be?
Houston Astros	5	23.81%
Minnesota Twins	8	38.10%
New York Mets	8	38.10%
Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll

05-12-2005, 07:56 PM	#1
Klew1986 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 2,727	Which Team to BE?? Please pick one of the three choices I should I be for my solo dynasty. And tell why you chose them. To help you decide, I will be using Halofan's most recent update (4/9).

05-12-2005, 08:16 PM	#3
Mike D Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: In a van, down by the river Posts: 2,802	None, maybe the the Draft Dodgers. __________________ Sometimes the best laid plans will never get you laid the way you plan.

05-12-2005, 08:29 PM	#4
Matt from TN Hall Of Famer Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: In a funk.... Posts: 3,413	Since we're talking about modern rosters, I say the Twins. They have the small market challenge & potentially some interestnig youngsters. Frankly, the Astros are boring. However, if you wanted to "rebuild," that might be the way to go since they're relatively old. __________________ Set in Stone... Players Remain with Original Franchise

05-12-2005, 09:17 PM	#6
metsgeek Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Norwood, MA Posts: 5,450	Let's go Mets! We need a good Mets dynasty I'd do one if I wasn't already running two. __________________ Commissioner - PBRL - Just finished 2009 109 seasons and still running strong!!!

05-12-2005, 08:14 PM	#2
Anti-Dye Banned Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 24	didnt u hav this pole b4? thats dum u shuld just pic 1 teem n stic w/it kthxbye

05-12-2005, 08:51 PM	#5
cubuff38 Minors (Single A) Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Boulder, Colorado Posts: 87	I say the Astros. They have an interesting blend now of quite old talent such as Clemens, Biggio, Bagwell (though dunno if you can call him talent anymore) as well as some good young guys and some killer young arms. Plus, Astros have always been a favorite of mine for some reason though I hate every other team in the state of Texas. They are a team in flux right now and in real life they suck. I'll give ya a read either way though.

05-12-2005, 10:07 PM	#7
tward13 All Star Starter Join Date: Jan 2003 Posts: 1,964	Mets. Because I'm a Mets fan.

05-13-2005, 01:24 AM	#8
The Mike! Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Bay Area Posts: 33	Mets are too easy. They automaticly have enough to buy any player, after the first year you'd be set to win without fail. __________________ Go Cubs!

05-13-2005, 11:49 AM	#10
congobeast Major Leagues Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Western Massachusetts Posts: 469	I'm with Matt. The Twins have the small market challenge that keeps things interesting. Payroll constraints IRL, suck. In-game- excellent. Edit: I think I'd consider the Royals too, for the same reason. Not sure why, but I also have a thing for wanting to see old "Mac the Ninth" succeed too. __________________ (The Boys of Summer) Cleveland Indians 1929-?? (All-Forum Baseball Dynasty) Pittsfield Hillies 2000-?? "I would walk through hell in a gasoline suit to play baseball." Pete Rose

05-14-2005, 11:18 AM	#11
YankeeFanatic04 Minors (Triple A) Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Brooklyn, New York Posts: 232	Who cares your not going to stick with it like the other ones u started. __________________