|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: General Discussions General chat about the game... |
| View Poll Results: Are your sims running slower with 6.02a? | |||
| Yes |
|
97 | 66.44% |
| No |
|
49 | 33.56% |
| Voters: 146. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,572
|
Patch 6.02A makes game run slower?
Has anyone else found that after installing the 6.02a patch that OOTP is running alot slower? The games are taking much longer to sim and it seems to "stick" on the "Finishing Day" section of the simulation.
Doc |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 348
|
Sim speed of games is about the same. Day finished takes about 30 seconds to complete and Week finished takes about 60 seconds to complete. Glad someone else noticed also.
__________________
To laugh often and love much, to appreciate beauty, to find the best in others, to give one's self, this is to have succeeded. - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 592
|
I'm just guessing here. But Markus said he tweaked the AI process that applies to irrevocable waivers, etc.
Is it possible that adding more AI analysis for CPU controlled teams for irrevocable waivers, etc., has slowed down each day? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Evanston, IL
Posts: 163
|
Yeah, I noticed this problem too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 8,277
|
Not slower on my end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,961
|
Perhaps you people should be posting system specs... most importantly OS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 348
|
p4 1.5
256meg Windows me Game started to run much slower after patch 6.02 and even slower after patch 6.02a. Day finished times are now almost a minute and a half and week finished run about 2 minutes.
__________________
To laugh often and love much, to appreciate beauty, to find the best in others, to give one's self, this is to have succeeded. - Ralph Waldo Emerson |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: california
Posts: 117
|
p4 2.53
1024 ram windows xp not slower here |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 89
|
I think there is definitely a problem unless Markus really did intend to use up that much CPU power with the AI changes. My system is pretty fast:
P4 3.2C running at DDR400 with 1GB of PC3700 RAM and a Radeon 9800 Pro video card (Windows XP SP1) I have a 40 team test league that I use to testing ratings. I have simmed this league 100's of times on 6.01 and it takes about 6 minutes to do the whole regular season. I just ran the same league with 6.02a and things didn't seem too bad until Sept rolled around. Day ends in Sept take about 12 seconds on my machine and Week ends are 25 seconds. The whole season takes about 15 minutes now (about 2.5x what it was with 6.01). I suspect it is related to all the callups and the AI associated with them. I doubt he intended it to take 25 seconds for a P4 3.2 to finish a week but maybe there is that much more computation going on. We'll have to see what Markus thinks. -Darryl |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 81
|
Much slower.
1.8 GHZ 512 RAM After finishing day it takes 30-35 seconds whereas before 3-5 seconds
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: La Grande, Oregon
Posts: 994
|
I don't know about slow but mine just crashes on a season I used just a few minutes ago!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Interwebs
Posts: 2,862
|
Yes, much slower here as well.
2.8GHZ 1GB RAM Windows XP All drivers/windows up to date. Game sim seems the same but end of day and week is much slower...
__________________
I was never one to patiently pick up broken fragments and glue them together again and tell myself that the mended whole was as good as new. What is broken is broken -- and I'd rather remember it as it was at its best than mend it and see the broken places as long as I lived.-Margaret Mitchell |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Frankfort, Kentucky
Posts: 3,746
|
Much slower than previous version, to the point of not being worth adding the patch.
Also have a previously working league that crashes and won't run with the patch. All the other leagues work. 1.4 GHZ 512 RAM Win ME (I know, I know, OOTP no longer works on Model T software)
__________________
Charlie Root won more games for the Cubs than any pitcher (201), yet was remembered for one pitch to Babe Ruth. Find out more about the 1929 World Series in my book, "Root for the Cubs: Charlie Root and the 1929 Chicago Cubs." See the web site at www.rootforthecubs.com. The book is at http://www.amazon.com/Root-Cubs-Char...t+for+the+cubs. Beta tester, OOTP 2007-2023 and iOOTP 2011-2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,572
|
System specs do not matter. The game ran extremely fast prior to the 6.02A patch and now it runs very slow. The patch should not slow down the game that much, there must be a glitch in the program. I warn others to wait another day or two and see if Markus issues another patch to fix this problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,961
|
Quote:
So, when Markus releases the handheld version of OOTP, you'll be right. Until then, it would probably help the developers to find out on what system this is happening. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 89
|
Everyone who says they don't see any change...
Did you run a full season and do you have it so that you can have the expanded major league roster in September? On my system I didn't really see any change until Sept. 1. It took about 5 minutes to sim to the end of August but 10 minutes to do just Sept. on my machine. -Darryl |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: GA, USA
Posts: 455
|
XP Home - 1.67 gHz Athlon - 512 MB
I don't have real numbers, because I never measured it, but it *seems* to be at least 3 times slower than before. It is actually running more like 6.01 with anti-virus on, except anti-virus is off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,961
|
I'm thinking it might be slower on mine, but I'm not sure, so it's likely just a placebo effect. If it is slower, it's not nearly as noticable as many make it out to be.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|