|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 26 - General Discussions Everything about the brand new 26th Anniversary Edition of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB, the MLBPA, KBO and the Baseball Hall of Fame. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Oct 2019
Posts: 33
|
Historical Play Teams Negative Balance
I was hoping to start a somewhat different historical replay of the 2005 Blue Jays with finances and trading turned on in order to possibly trade for relievers at the deadline. Upon looking at the finances however, a significant amount of teams are heavily negative in budget space which makes them pretty much unable to conduct trades.
The only way to somewhat mitigate this (expect individual editing of budgets) was for me to reload the financial modifiers and apply the correction on contracts, this left only a few teams in the red. Is there any reason why the standard finances show up this skewed? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Caracas
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
As a player who only plays historically, I can tell you that OOTP has always had this problem. It imports historical financial data (TV revenue, ticket prices, etc.) and then loads the contracts of the players who played that year. In real life, we don't know what the team's finances were when they made the signings (it's all guesswork), and this happens with 50-60% of all teams in any historical year you start. You have two options: either edit the finances for the first year yourself (which is a long and tedious process) or let the AI manage each team's finances for two or three years of simulation. Afterward, you'll see that all the teams have a reasonable budget. Last edited by Daniel_09; 11-19-2025 at 02:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2021
Location: Caracas
Posts: 318
|
And this is nothing, you start in the 90s and teams have a balance of -$3M when minor league contracts are $110K
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|