|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 18 - General Discussions Everything about the 2017 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,727
|
Fictional League Idea
I will be starting a United States Baseball League, fictional, when OOTP18 is released. I will start with 10 or 12 teams and slowly expand to 24 teams. My question is, should I go with 3 divisions per league (4 teams per division) or 2 divisions per league (6 teams per division)?
If I go with the 3 division set up, I would have 1 wild-card team, so 1 vs 4 and 2 vs 3. If I go with 2 division, I would have the division winners face off. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,523
|
3 divisions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Republic of California
Posts: 1,911
|
I really dislike divisions/leagues with fewer than 6 teams each... you could still use 2 wild cards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Texas!
Posts: 2,633
|
i'm gonna go old school with my dynasty 6 team divisions, no wild card.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: The OOTP Forums. Always.
Posts: 1,951
|
I say 4 divisions 2 wild cards.
__________________
I write a monthly newsletter on the Food Baseball Association. I also listen to music no one's ever heard of in hopes of looking cool and alternative. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 550
|
If it's only 12 teams, definitely 2 divisions. Never a good idea to go w/ too many divisions. At 24 teams, 4 -6 divisions work.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Juust a bit outside...
Posts: 6,299
|
no divisions.
__________________
"Cannonball Coming!" Go Bucs!! Founder and League Caretaker of the Professional Baseball Circuit, www.probaseballcircuit.com An Un-Official Guide to Minor League Management in OOTP 21 Ratings Scale Conversion Cross-Reference Cheat Sheet |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 228
|
I'm with jp. No divisions, top 2 play in championship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Hague,Netherlands
Posts: 891
|
Two divisions of five teams
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,008
|
2 divisions - 6 teams with an unbalanced schedule so that division head to head matters more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico (formally San Diego, CA.)
Posts: 4,131
|
This
__________________
![]() Chargers= Despicable Traitors |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 287
|
If you want an all-star game mid-season, you should go the 2 division route.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico (formally San Diego, CA.)
Posts: 4,131
|
I have a 5 team minimum per division my self anything less than that feels cheap to me
__________________
![]() Chargers= Despicable Traitors |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,379
|
If you want to include realism, you can't ignore the fact that large divisions/leagues cause greater turnover of teams. A city in a 12 team league continuously in the second tier will see a large drop-off in attendance and find another city to move to to better their fortunes.
__________________
HRB |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 4,059
|
One Division only, top 3 teams make the playoffs in the division
__________________
![]() ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Michigan
Posts: 586
|
I'd go for 2 divisions, but the top 2 teams in each make the playoffs. Helps make things interesting to have an extra round of playoffs. Once it expands to the point of 2 divisions per league, then could keep it as the division champions or let in the top 2 in all 4 divisions still. Something to keep it fair for teams who can't compete with the top team is always good, I feel.
__________________
FHM Beta Tester and lifelong Red Wings fanatic |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,642
|
Quote:
Plus you have a variety of actual real-life NL schedules to choose from (the particular structure/rotation of opponents used in 1969, for example, was rather different from that used in 1989). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SoCal, for now
Posts: 239
|
Generally I like to have about 30-50% of the league included in the playoffs, so 4-6 teams in your 12-team setup. I'd do two divisions, division winners + two wild cards like other people have been saying. Maybe even throw in a third wild card like they do in MLB now.
__________________
SELL THE TEAM! Last edited by lightgrenade07; 03-05-2017 at 07:36 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,642
|
Quote:
One proposal was for the top two teams in each division to make the playoffs, with the second-place team in one division playing the first-place team in the other division in a best-of-5 series. The advancing clubs would then play a best-of-5 league championship series. Another proposal called for the two division winners and two wild card clubs to make the playoffs in each league. Both rounds of the playoffs would be best-of-five. The third proposal was to split the leagues into three divisions of four teams each, with the three division winners and one wild card team qualifying for the playoffs. All of these proposals were rejected. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 538
|
No league I ever create will have wild card play. I hate it. Playoff depth only muddles the waters. After 162 games it should be apparent who the best team is. My historical leagues forever remain static once they hit 1985.
If you weren't expanding, I'd say 1 division. Team that comes in first is the champion. Since you are, I'd go with 2 divisions. Of course, if you want a challenge, make it 1 division that eventually has 24 teams. I've played with a 48 team, 1 division league before. You have to play extremely well to win that. 105 wins just to be in the running. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|