|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 17 - General Discussions Everything about the latest Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 121
|
Playoff Home Field Advantage
Just wrapped up the 2016 season and now in the playoffs, I have a question that hopefully you knowledgeable folks can clarify.
Detroit won the Central Division title with a record of 91-71. They were the second seed among the division winners. Toronto was the #1 wild card with a record of 93-69. Both teams are now in the American League Championship Series and the game is showing Toronto with home field advantage based on their better record. My understanding is that regardless of record the wild card team should not have home field advantage in any league series. Is that correct? Which team should have the home field advantage, Detroit or Toronto? By the way, the Cubs are playing the Dodgers for the National League Championship. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 133
|
In the 2015 NLCS the Cubs as a wildcard had a much better record than the Mets as division winners and the Mets had homefield in that series
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,644
|
Quote:
Unfortunately, OOTP does not get this correct. (It has some shortcomings in regards to post-season schedules and match-ups.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 121
|
Thanks for the quick responses. I can just manually manipulate the scheduled games to change the home field advantage, correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
Quote:
I just checked 7 postseasons in two different leagues and the WC never got HFA inappropriately within a league. When a WC and/or a lower record division winner made the WS the HFA was correct based on alternating HFA by league each year.
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 7,273
Infractions: 0/1 (3)
|
very easy workaround, go to edit scheduel and click "Flip teams" for each game in that series. no thought or planning required.
since others aren't seeing it. i'd double check that it is not reseeding after each playoff round. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,644
|
Quote:
(OOTP's post-season scheduling still needs work, especially for the minor leagues and historical leagues.) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
One, so that could be the reason.
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
Yeah, thanks Bud Selig. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
I have that off in my game.
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 460
|
People criticize the all star game method, yet I fail to see how either a random method based on year or comparing standings from matches played against different opponents is in any way more fairer. "The best players from each league fight for the home field advantage" is a reasonable solution - not perfect, but so aren't your counter offers.
__________________
"Odor is now 2 for 5 today" (Commentator, after Rougned Odor, up to then 1 for 4, punched Jose Bautista square in the face.) |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
Let it be determined by the teams who get there at the end of October. Not by players from any of the other 28 teams. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 460
|
But the if the difference between home field advantage is being swept by the Red Sox instead of sweeping the Brewers, that is something you can control?
One could say that while the all star methods has it flaws, it is inherently fair - while the strenght of schedule method is inherently flawed by the objective disparity between different divisions as well as between the NL and AL as a whole. If you're complaining about other players not doing enough in the ASG, your could send more ![]() But, hell, I'd argue for a 2 A - 3 B - 1A - game 7 at a neutral side halfway in between the cities anyway.
__________________
"Odor is now 2 for 5 today" (Commentator, after Rougned Odor, up to then 1 for 4, punched Jose Bautista square in the face.) Last edited by Number4; 10-31-2016 at 12:21 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
My biggest beef is that the All-Star game is treated like an exhibition in every way, but the outcome directly affects the World Series. That is the epitome of contradiction. If they want it to be important, run it like an important game. The best players play the whole game and not every team is guaranteed a representative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,379
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 121
|
My take on all this? Hockey gets it right with it's 2-2-1-1-1 format. That's the thing that bugs me the most about baseball playoffs. In game 5, the team without home field advantage has more home games than the team with the advantage. How is that fair? If you steal one game as the visitor in game 1 or 2, then you are cruising with 3 games in a row at your home park. The team with "home field advantage" has to hope there's a game 6 to play in front of their fans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
OOTP Developer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 16,152
|
To me, it's still an unbalanced schedule otherwise too. I mean, Cleveland got home field over Boston in their series because they won 1 more game, but they also had almost half their games against DET/KC/CWS/MIN vs Boston having half the games against TO/BAL/NY/TB, never mind that both teams had different inter-league opponents.
So yeah, schedules aren't balanced, but take 162 games, whoever has the better record gets home field in the World Series. Everyone and their mother knows the Cubs were a better team in the regular season over the Indians, so they should have home field. Never mind that it didn't happen as much this year, but it could have been Chapman getting the save in the All-Star game that screws it for his new team because he switched leagues. As for the original, yeah, the wildcard should be the road team in the ALCS always. Looks like we might not be picking teams in the right order, so we can be sure to fix it up for next year. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|