|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 17 - General Discussions Everything about the latest Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,626
|
Short Historical Test
I am in a quandary. I started with the Beta Release with my rebooted dynasty. I felt the start was a little off as the runs scored each game was too out of wack, some like football scores. So fired another game up with me now not controlling a team. Simmed to around the same point in time as my current game. See the attached pic. So what does anyone think?
__________________
This just feels more like waiting in line at the Department of Motor Vehicles. ![]() PETA.....People Eating Tasty Animals. ![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Lonely Mountain
Posts: 2,506
|
You have to remember the low sample sizes you get with the early years, which leads to things like a .305 BABIP. All it takes is for McMullen to go nuts one game and give up 47 runs (which actually happened in real life) to screw up the stats. Are you using the model with the two subleagues and eight teams? If so, I wouldn't pay any attention at all to the totals until 1876. But there are going to be some football scores in those National Association games. They actually happened, and the fact that you're getting them shows that the game is doing pretty well.
__________________
“Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies." -- C.S. Lewis |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Developer OOTP
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 24,803
|
Yeah, early years are very volatile because of the small sample size and the different schedules we use.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|