Not worth doing standard MLB yet? And choose my Historical

Jman0329 · 03-18-2016, 05:47 PM

Noticed that the contracts are likely not all correct, and some here have said also they're waiting for roster updates. Guess I'll dive into some historical!

VOTE HERE FOR MY TEAM

I am a fan of huge rebuild projects, and feel that is usually where I thrive best.

risp2out · 03-18-2016, 05:51 PM

the 1936 Dodgers finished next to last, 20 games below .500 - see if you get them to the World Series by 1941 (as in real life), and try to get them a championship before 1955

DJP53916 · 03-18-2016, 05:58 PM

I voted 2003 Tigers. Was that team BAD!

Can you make the World Series by 2006?

Jman0329 · 03-18-2016, 06:05 PM

2006 would be quite a challenge, one I might need to try

03-18-2016, 05:47 PM	#1
Jman0329 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 49	Not worth doing standard MLB yet? And choose my Historical Noticed that the contracts are likely not all correct, and some here have said also they're waiting for roster updates. Guess I'll dive into some historical! VOTE HERE FOR MY TEAM I am a fan of huge rebuild projects, and feel that is usually where I thrive best.

03-18-2016, 05:51 PM	#2
risp2out All Star Reserve Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 648	the 1936 Dodgers finished next to last, 20 games below .500 - see if you get them to the World Series by 1941 (as in real life), and try to get them a championship before 1955

03-18-2016, 05:58 PM	#3
DJP53916 Minors (Double A) Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 175	I voted 2003 Tigers. Was that team BAD! Can you make the World Series by 2006?

03-18-2016, 06:05 PM	#4
Jman0329 Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: Charlotte, NC Posts: 49	2006 would be quite a challenge, one I might need to try