|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 14 - General Discussions Discuss the new 2013 version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 42
|
Rule 5 Drafted Players Returned?
I had three players drafted in the most recent Rule 5 draft and all of them are way too young to be playing in the majors, yet the AI teams refuse to return them to me. Is this just the AI team having no other options, or is there a "bug" in OOTP 14 where the AI simply doesn't return Rule 5 drafted players?
Just curious about others experiences with players they lost in the Rule 5 Draft. TIA! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,507
|
21 is by no means too young. Perhaps the AI values them enough to keep them in the majors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 245
|
I'm pretty sure I have had one player returned with OOTP14 (a previous version). He appeared in my DFA long after I had forgotten about him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, US
Posts: 2,006
|
If they release them they are returned to your DFA and I believe if they waive them and they are not claimed by anyone they are returned to you otherwise the claiming team assumes the responsibility for the Rule 5 pick.
The process does work in game for the most part based on the last time I tested it. The one issue there used to be, and I don't know that it has been fixed, is that if a team trades a Rule 5 pick to someone else or they are claimed off waivers by someone else, and that new team releases them they go back to the team that traded/waived them instead of the original team. This may have been fixed. Last edited by byzeil; 02-28-2014 at 11:20 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
why would they return them... Rule 5 picks generally are prospect you are hoping won't do too much damage by staying on your roster for a year. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
if anything I have seen AI return players that delivered as expected (ie pinch runner, bullpen help), which I thought for a rebuilding team they should have kept |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: NJ, US
Posts: 2,006
|
Quote:
As best I can see the Rule 5 draft works the way it is supposed to work. Edit: If a Rule 5 drafted player is released they return to their original team. If you waive said player and he is claimed the claiming team assumes the Rule 5 responsibilities. If he is not claimed he remains on your roster with the same Rule 5 responsibilities. If you release the player during the season you get charged the remaining value of his contract before he is returned to his original team. If he is claimed on waivers the claiming team assumes the contract. Last edited by byzeil; 02-28-2014 at 01:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 42
|
Thanks, guys. I hated to throw the bug word out there, I was just curious if anyone had ever had their players returned. Since at least one of you has, I assume its simply as I suspected; the AI teams clearly see a reason to keep them.
For the record, these were all AA guys older than 23, so it's not surprising someone would take a chance on them. Looking closer, one of the three is actually having a good year. I was simply curious if there was even a possibility of them being returned (in OOTP; I know the ML rules). Thanks again! |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
actually there was one thing that i found that did not work. (in early days when i allowed myself Rule 5 claims). I claimed someone on rule 5, and later traded him to the original team, where he sat on the roster all year. AI seemed unaware that he could actually send the player down, since it owned his right. I have tested twice more with same results. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
ADD: yes you can send the player down to minors when you get his rights back. Only difference from before is he is now on your 40-man roster, and to remove him you need to go through waivers Last edited by le receveur; 02-28-2014 at 02:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
OOTP Developments
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Nice, Côte d'Azur, France
Posts: 21,365
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
I suppose if I really liked them, I should have protected them. If there's a drawback of a deep system its that you can't protect everyone. Since they we A ball players at the time of the draft, I assumed they were safe. I know better now. Learning experience. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: canada
Posts: 1,736
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,374
|
I have definitely had players I lost in the Rule 5 draft returned to me. My only complaint was that I didn't get a notification about it - I just happened to be in my Transaction Overview screen and was wondering why my lowest minor league team had so many MRs, and I saw his name. "Wait, didn't I get rid of you?"
Sure enough he'd been returned a couple of weeks ago. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|