|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 14 - General Discussions Discuss the new 2013 version of Out of the Park Baseball here! |
| View Poll Results: Do You Use Scouts When You Play OOTP? | |||
| Yes |
|
96 | 78.05% |
| No |
|
27 | 21.95% |
| Voters: 123. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,727
|
How Many Of You Use Scouts?
I have always used scouts in my MLB games, but am thinking of maybe trying without scouts this time around. What are your thoughts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Cadiz, Ohio
Posts: 946
|
Only started doing so with 14, like the searching they do and players they find for the international complex, can find some great prospect there.
__________________
Pittsburgh Pirates, Cleveland Indians fan Rewriting Cubs History, a Dynasty Report Baseball History, What Might Have Been Rewriting Cubs History Poll |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Somewhere raising the Jolly Roger
Posts: 515
|
No scouts is the path to the Dark Side. No scouts leads to lack of challenge. Lack of challenge leads to boredom. Boredom leads to stats only.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,727
|
I'm still torn on this. And I know when you start a new MLB game, it only has like 10 scouts available to sign. So usually I create 100 more just have some choices.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 371
|
What's driving you to consider playing without scouts? Are you looking for a more challenging game or just curious what it might be like?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,727
|
Just curious as I have always played with scouts. Just wanted some input on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Inside The Game
Posts: 30,937
|
I rely heavily on a good scout when it comes to drafting. For trades I rely on stats and I will look at ratings to make sure he can field the position I need him to play. I made the mistake of trading for a 38 yr old Ozzie Guillen batting .372 in 34 g 76 AB but he was DH/bench who had fielding ratings on 1 at all positions. I play in a non DH league so Ozzie saw 19 AB's as a PH before I manually retired him. I will look at the scouting report almost every January, start of ST and OD after that the only time I talk to him
is for the Ammy draft.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,130
|
I use scouts when I play fictional- but I generally don't use scouts (or use them at 100% accuracy) when I play MLB quickstart because I "know" how good the players and the scouting assessments can be pretty incongruent with their actual abilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 604
|
I use scouts, but I have the accuracy on very low. I rely on my scout for the draft mostly, but I take his report into consideration for prospects as long as the stats back up the claim.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: with my army of orangutans
Posts: 2,948
|
And stats only is also the best way to play the game (as well as the greatest challenge). :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,603
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
No. A desire to play less of a game and more of a simulation is what leads to stats only.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,143
|
Depends..if you play rating scale 2-8 stats become a major factor...especially with the new player creation algorithm (much more mediocre players)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,603
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Waaaaaaay too many mediocre players. Not enough variety.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,919
|
I agree with PSUColonel. In 13 and earlier it was easy to wait around for talent that was at least average in everything. Now you almost have to make do with players with holes, sometimes major ones, in their games. I've had to personally change what I think of as a useful MLB player.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases......
Posts: 16,142
|
I usually have scouts turned on, but I never pay them any attention......I play stats only.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: All alone
Posts: 12,603
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
Everyone's entitled to an opinion. Personally I don't like having organizations that are 95+% trash.
__________________
__________________ Quote:
Five thousand thanks for a non-modder? I never thought I'd see the day. Thank you for your support. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back Bay in Boston
Posts: 295
|
Are scouts incompatible with stats only? Can one set things up so that scouts only give you their verbal comments ("destined to be a minor leaguer") and no numerical ratings? Is that "stats only"? Or do scouts always provide ratings too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,919
|
If you have scouts enabled but have all the ratings set to not be shown, you still get the verbal reports.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back Bay in Boston
Posts: 295
|
Thanks. So do "stats only" purists refuse even that, "verbal-only" use of scouts? I'm in an online league now that relies primarily on stats, but we do get verbal scout reports and a couple of the "other" ratings. I could live without the "other" ratings. But I think the verbal reports are neat, and I'd miss having them.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|