Wow Domination

Theonlystd · 12-04-2007, 02:48 PM

I was simming and noticed one of the leaders had 0.00 Era thought it had to be a bug... So checked it out and well hes dominated .. He was the first pick in the draft in 2009 by the Pirates . Only thing stat wise i had changed was put pitcher endurance on normal and use of relievers on normal

zuty · 12-04-2007, 04:08 PM

I'd really be curious to look at box scores and play-by-plays to see how those six runs were scored.

Kelric · 12-04-2007, 05:43 PM

Dominions 3 and OOTP. Good choices.

No earned runs in 68 innings. That's ridiculous.

cbbl · 12-07-2007, 09:47 AM

Interesting that you use various scales depending on the rating group -- why is that? It looks like you use 20-80 for the overall and potential ratings, 1-100 for the current rating group, 1-20 for the potential group, something else for the player attributes group.

12-04-2007, 02:48 PM	#1
Theonlystd Minors (Double A) Join Date: Oct 2002 Posts: 159	Wow Domination I was simming and noticed one of the leaders had 0.00 Era thought it had to be a bug... So checked it out and well hes dominated .. He was the first pick in the draft in 2009 by the Pirates . Only thing stat wise i had changed was put pitcher endurance on normal and use of relievers on normal

12-04-2007, 04:08 PM	#2
zuty Minors (Double A) Join Date: Dec 2003 Posts: 173	I'd really be curious to look at box scores and play-by-plays to see how those six runs were scored.

12-04-2007, 05:43 PM	#3
Kelric Hall Of Famer Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Greater Boston Area Posts: 3,992	Dominions 3 and OOTP. Good choices. No earned runs in 68 innings. That's ridiculous.

12-07-2007, 09:47 AM	#4
cbbl All Star Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 1,179	Interesting that you use various scales depending on the rating group -- why is that? It looks like you use 20-80 for the overall and potential ratings, 1-100 for the current rating group, 1-20 for the potential group, something else for the player attributes group.