Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 26 Available - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 26 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-11-2007, 05:01 PM   #1
Zoso1515
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 507
Infractions: 0/2 (2)
Whip

Since pitcher can't usually control hits against them (BABIP) and hits make up such a large part of WHIP, why do people still use it?
Zoso1515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 05:27 PM   #2
mikev
Hall Of Famer
 
mikev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,014
What would your alternative be?
__________________
Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and Oakland Oaks GM
mikev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 05:27 PM   #3
treedom
Hall Of Famer
 
treedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Transylvania
Posts: 2,900
CHAIN
__________________
A rake and a roustabout.
treedom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 05:29 PM   #4
mikev
Hall Of Famer
 
mikev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by treedom View Post
CHAIN
I don't see how Caughtstealing, Hits, All star selections, Intentional walks, or No decisions really factor into how good a pitcher is.
__________________
Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and Oakland Oaks GM
mikev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 05:34 PM   #5
bigdgp2
All Star Reserve
 
bigdgp2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 606
I'd use HOlds, Base-on-Balls, Innings pitched, Total batters faced and Saves for my pitchers.

Last edited by bigdgp2; 04-11-2007 at 05:39 PM.
bigdgp2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 05:57 PM   #6
marc
Hall Of Famer
 
marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigdgp2 View Post
I'd use HOlds, Base-on-Balls, Innings pitched, Total batters faced and Saves for my pitchers.

Don't forget wins!
__________________


marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 06:16 PM   #7
ihatenames
Hall Of Famer
 
ihatenames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rockford
Posts: 2,534
I use WHIP because BABIP only includes balls in play. Pitchers can control strikeouts and walks. Strikeout and BBs do have an direct influence on WHIP. Also teams can't score if people are not on base. WHIP to me is a good indicator of how effective a pitcher is.
__________________
New Album coming soon!
ihatenames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 07:14 PM   #8
Zoso1515
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 507
Infractions: 0/2 (2)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikev View Post
What would your alternative be?

I usually look at K/9, BB/9, HR/9 rates and sometimes (rarely) GB/FB ratio.
Zoso1515 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 07:31 PM   #9
jbergey22
Hall Of Famer
 
jbergey22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoso1515 View Post
Since pitcher can't usually control hits against them (BABIP) and hits make up such a large part of WHIP, why do people still use it?
I would guess Greg Maddux in his prime would refute this argument. I am not saying WHIP ISN'T an over rated in compared to other similiar stats. I am debating your statement that pitchers "can't usually control hits against them"

Last edited by jbergey22; 04-11-2007 at 09:26 PM.
jbergey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 08:37 PM   #10
lewis31lewis52
All Star Reserve
 
lewis31lewis52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Michigan University
Posts: 580
But they can't really. They can control whether the pitch is hittable, but once it's hit, it's totally out of their hands where the ball goes.
__________________
lewis31lewis52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 08:50 PM   #11
Sven Draconian
Major Leagues
 
Sven Draconian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewis31lewis52 View Post
But they can't really. They can control whether the pitch is hittable, but once it's hit, it's totally out of their hands where the ball goes.

Your taking that a bit too far. They do not have as much control, and luck is a large part, but good pitchers do exhibit some control.

Look at the first DIPs version of OOTP, Marcus had to add in some control to pitchers with high stuff (the stuff being the link is debateable) because he wasn't getting any pitchers varying outside the norm.

The base of Voros McCrakens work is that most pichers do not have as much control over hits as was once thought, and that K/BB/HR are far more consistant. That is different from saying they have no control
Sven Draconian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 08:55 PM   #12
lewis31lewis52
All Star Reserve
 
lewis31lewis52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Michigan University
Posts: 580
I'm not saying they're totally out of control, I'm saying that once the ball is hit, they can't really control if it lands safely or not.
__________________
lewis31lewis52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 09:03 PM   #13
DougWyatt
All Star Starter
 
DougWyatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by lewis31lewis52 View Post
But they can't really. They can control whether the pitch is hittable, but once it's hit, it's totally out of their hands where the ball goes.
I disagree. Completely. Why do pitchers try to keep it down ? Especially with runners on ? .... To enduce ground balls. This is a good example. No, it's not 100% all the time true, but it isn't just a theory.

A pitcher can control BABIP to some extent. Location, speed, keepin' 'em guessin ... all these things contribute to how well a batter is going to hit a ball. Again, not 100%, all the time true - but certainly over the course of a season, it is evident.

Also, I think it's a great stat. I'm not sure what the point of this topic was. To me, by that line of thought - only the K and BB are relevant pitching stats.
DougWyatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 10:36 PM   #14
Mike Donlin
All Star Reserve
 
Mike Donlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Life, friends, is boring.
Posts: 840
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougWyatt View Post
I disagree. Completely. Why do pitchers try to keep it down ? Especially with runners on ? .... To enduce ground balls. This is a good example. No, it's not 100% all the time true, but it isn't just a theory.

A pitcher can control BABIP to some extent. Location, speed, keepin' 'em guessin ... all these things contribute to how well a batter is going to hit a ball. Again, not 100%, all the time true - but certainly over the course of a season, it is evident.
Oh God not again. The argument is that if a pitcher reaches the majors, he (and every one of his peers) has become as good at controlling balls in play as they possibly can. After that, it's defense and luck.

Last edited by Mike Donlin; 04-11-2007 at 10:37 PM.
Mike Donlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 10:44 PM   #15
marc
Hall Of Famer
 
marc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,505
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Donlin View Post
Oh God not again. The argument is that if a pitcher reaches the majors, he (and every one of his peers) has become as good at controlling balls in play as they possibly can. After that, it's defense and luck.

Greg Maddux absolutlely obliterates this theory.
__________________


marc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 10:46 PM   #16
treedom
Hall Of Famer
 
treedom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Transylvania
Posts: 2,900
:slurpsoup:
__________________
A rake and a roustabout.
treedom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 10:49 PM   #17
DougWyatt
All Star Starter
 
DougWyatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Donlin View Post
Oh God not again. The argument is that if a pitcher reaches the majors, he (and every one of his peers) has become as good at controlling balls in play as they possibly can. After that, it's defense and luck.
Apparantly, I've stumbled on some old debate. I'll walk away


lol... nah, I'm curious.

So the thinking there, is that a pitcher should only be judged by K's and BBs, since that's all he can control - and all else is defense and luck ?

That's crazy talk to me.

Last edited by DougWyatt; 04-11-2007 at 10:52 PM.
DougWyatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 10:57 PM   #18
Mike Donlin
All Star Reserve
 
Mike Donlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Life, friends, is boring.
Posts: 840
Quote:
Originally Posted by DougWyatt View Post
Apparantly, I've stumbled on some old debate. I'll walk away


lol... nah, I'm curious.

So the thinking there, is that a pitcher should only be judged by K's and BBs, since that's all he can control - and all else is defense and luck ?

That's crazy talk to me.
K, BB, and HR, although HR are correlated with GB/FB%, and HR per FB is as much (roughly) a matter of luck and ballpark as skill.
Mike Donlin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 11:44 PM   #19
jbergey22
Hall Of Famer
 
jbergey22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
Carlos Silva must be very unlucky because he sure gives up a lot of hits per IP. Greg Maddux needs to play the lottery because he has been blessed with great luck his entire career.

I really dont want to discuss this topic but this theory completely blows conventional baseball wisdom out the door. Good location, good movement, pitch selection set the hitter up not for strikeouts but for weak ground balls or flyouts. This is controlled BY the pitcher making these pitches NOT by luck!
jbergey22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 11:57 PM   #20
DougWyatt
All Star Starter
 
DougWyatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbergey22 View Post
Carlos Silva must be very unlucky because he sure gives up a lot of hits per IP. Greg Maddux needs to play the lottery because he has been blessed with great luck his entire career.

I really dont want to discuss this topic but this theory completely blows conventional baseball wisdom out the door. Good location, good movement, pitch selection set the hitter up not for strikeouts but for weak ground balls or flyouts. This is controlled BY the pitcher making these pitches NOT by luck!
I don't know, now that I think about it - maybe that theory is right.

And, as I think about it more ... the pitcher really doesn't completely control whether or not the batter hits the ball; as a large portion of that is controlled by the batter. So, really - the only thing a pitcher completely controls is whether or not he throws a ball or a strike. (which one could argue, that is also dependant on the wind and the umpires judgement - but I won't go there). So, realistically - the only stat that really matters is the Walk.

Given this new insight, I say we just get rid of the whole pitcher element - as the position doesn't really impact the game. Just set up a tee to hit off of.
DougWyatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:46 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments