|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 507
Infractions: 0/2 (2)
|
Whip
Since pitcher can't usually control hits against them (BABIP) and hits make up such a large part of WHIP, why do people still use it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,014
|
What would your alternative be?
__________________
Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and Oakland Oaks GM |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Transylvania
Posts: 2,900
|
CHAIN
__________________
A rake and a roustabout. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,014
|
I don't see how Caughtstealing, Hits, All star selections, Intentional walks, or No decisions really factor into how good a pitcher is.
__________________
Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and Oakland Oaks GM |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 606
|
I'd use HOlds, Base-on-Balls, Innings pitched, Total batters faced and Saves for my pitchers.
__________________
https://challenge.ootpdevelopments.c...lawlsopher.jpg Last edited by bigdgp2; 04-11-2007 at 05:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,505
|
Quote:
Don't forget wins! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Rockford
Posts: 2,534
|
I use WHIP because BABIP only includes balls in play. Pitchers can control strikeouts and walks. Strikeout and BBs do have an direct influence on WHIP. Also teams can't score if people are not on base. WHIP to me is a good indicator of how effective a pitcher is.
__________________
New Album coming soon! |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 507
Infractions: 0/2 (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
|
I would guess Greg Maddux in his prime would refute this argument. I am not saying WHIP ISN'T an over rated in compared to other similiar stats. I am debating your statement that pitchers "can't usually control hits against them"
Last edited by jbergey22; 04-11-2007 at 09:26 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Michigan University
Posts: 580
|
But they can't really. They can control whether the pitch is hittable, but once it's hit, it's totally out of their hands where the ball goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 432
|
Quote:
Your taking that a bit too far. They do not have as much control, and luck is a large part, but good pitchers do exhibit some control. Look at the first DIPs version of OOTP, Marcus had to add in some control to pitchers with high stuff (the stuff being the link is debateable) because he wasn't getting any pitchers varying outside the norm. The base of Voros McCrakens work is that most pichers do not have as much control over hits as was once thought, and that K/BB/HR are far more consistant. That is different from saying they have no control |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Michigan University
Posts: 580
|
I'm not saying they're totally out of control, I'm saying that once the ball is hit, they can't really control if it lands safely or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
A pitcher can control BABIP to some extent. Location, speed, keepin' 'em guessin ... all these things contribute to how well a batter is going to hit a ball. Again, not 100%, all the time true - but certainly over the course of a season, it is evident. Also, I think it's a great stat. I'm not sure what the point of this topic was. To me, by that line of thought - only the K and BB are relevant pitching stats. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Life, friends, is boring.
Posts: 840
|
Quote:
Last edited by Mike Donlin; 04-11-2007 at 10:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,505
|
Quote:
Greg Maddux absolutlely obliterates this theory. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Transylvania
Posts: 2,900
|
:slurpsoup:
__________________
A rake and a roustabout. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
![]() lol... nah, I'm curious. So the thinking there, is that a pitcher should only be judged by K's and BBs, since that's all he can control - and all else is defense and luck ? That's crazy talk to me. Last edited by DougWyatt; 04-11-2007 at 10:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Life, friends, is boring.
Posts: 840
|
K, BB, and HR, although HR are correlated with GB/FB%, and HR per FB is as much (roughly) a matter of luck and ballpark as skill.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
|
Carlos Silva must be very unlucky because he sure gives up a lot of hits per IP. Greg Maddux needs to play the lottery because he has been blessed with great luck his entire career.
I really dont want to discuss this topic but this theory completely blows conventional baseball wisdom out the door. Good location, good movement, pitch selection set the hitter up not for strikeouts but for weak ground balls or flyouts. This is controlled BY the pitcher making these pitches NOT by luck! |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,117
|
Quote:
And, as I think about it more ... the pitcher really doesn't completely control whether or not the batter hits the ball; as a large portion of that is controlled by the batter. So, really - the only thing a pitcher completely controls is whether or not he throws a ball or a strike. (which one could argue, that is also dependant on the wind and the umpires judgement - but I won't go there). So, realistically - the only stat that really matters is the Walk. Given this new insight, I say we just get rid of the whole pitcher element - as the position doesn't really impact the game. Just set up a tee to hit off of. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|