|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: General Discussions General chat about the game... |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 1,923
|
Overall and Potential in Transaction Screen
I have my ratings on a 1-10 scale, but on the Transaction Page my players show ratings for what appear to be a 1-100 range. Those are the only two ratings that are like that. Con/Stuff, Pow/Mov, and Eye/Con all are in the 1-10 range. On the roster page, everything looks normal.
Should it be this way (Im thinking not)? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,498
|
overall and potential are always on a 20-80 scale no matter what you have it set at.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 114
|
Any reason why it can't either change with the scale being used, or why it isn't defaulted to something easier to understand like 1-100?
At least for us simpletons out there
__________________
Cheers, Andrew Howard |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 1,923
|
Quote:
Thanks a bunch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 2,865
Infractions: 1/0 (0)
|
I would imagine it's defaulted to 20-80 because that's the real scouting scale (although as someone else pointed out in another thread, it's really only a 13 point scale rather than 61). I didn't even realize you couldn't change it until this thread since I always use 20-80.
While I agree it should be customizable, if it helps at all: 50 is average so you can work from there, plus the color coding is the same as any other scale. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 3,498
|
Here is some good info posted by Markus
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Newburgh, NY
Posts: 1,923
|
If it was just a quick way to get the ratings onto the page, then fine, but thats got to be fixed. It kind of makes using a lower scale a moot point. Sure two guys could be a 5 in a 1-10 scale, but one look at the transaction screen tells me way too much information (as far as Im concerned) as far as who the better player is (or will be). I dont mind the rating there, but it should scale with the rest of the ratings. If one guy is a 5 with a 65 potential and the other is a 5 with a 56 potential, guess which one Im taking 100% of the time.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 114
|
Quote:
For pitchers, does this go by position, or what? For instance, if I have a MR that is a 60, a SP that is a 60, and a CL that is a 60, are they all equal, or is the MR elite, CL good, and SP above average? See what I mean? Hopefully this gets changed in an upcoming patch. I'm still holding out hope that they do one more decent patch for the game, before I give up completely. No matter how frustrating the game still is, I still get glimpses of how fun it can be if it was "polished". The new features, depth of stats, and interface are so good, if only they were complete and all worked right.
__________________
Cheers, Andrew Howard |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|