|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 114
|
Not the usual "type mismatch" Catobase error
I'm still using 6.12. When producing the HTML reports, I get this error:
![]() ...any ideas? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 16,842
|
Noticed the CatoBase 6.0.0 - Have you never run the 6.1.4 version, or does it just not show up in the header for some reason?
Not that that is the solution by any means, just the first question I had.
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett _____________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 114
|
I get the error with both the most recent Catobase version and with 6.0
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 16,842
|
BIG BUMP
While I could never re-recreate this in my initial effort to assist you, I find it now is the SAME problem I'm facing in an online league Catobase. Anyone ever run into this Type 13? Mine also occurs on the very same page: League Page Fielding Register. I've scoured the Fielding Tables with Access, and I'm just not keen enough to see what might be amiss. Anyone?
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett _____________________________________________ |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Düsseldorf, Germany
Posts: 657
|
I would look for fielders that have minimal playing time at a position. Could be a fielder that had an error on his only play at a certain position, got injured on the play, or entered in the 9th inning made an error which was followed by a walk-off homer and therefore has an error recorded, but zero inning playing time.
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|