Camden Yards

[BaseballGOAT]

Originally Posted by Syd Thrift

I see we are now into the “making stuff up” stage of the madness…

I apologize, I mixed you up for a second with Brad K

[Syd Thrift]

Originally Posted by BaseballGOAT

I apologize, I mixed you up for a second with Brad K

If ever you’re in doubt, he’s the one who wants Roger Maris to hit 70 HRs in 1961 as often as he hits 52…

[Cactusguy21]

He probably has a few percent chance of hitting 0-9 because of a spring injury, so therefore he needs a few percent for 110 homers!

[Birdland24]

Will we ever get the updated Camden Yards model? Kinda sad we are about a year and a half in and still nothing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[james17]

Originally Posted by Birdland24

Will we ever get the updated Camden Yards model? Kinda sad we are about a year and a half in and still nothing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I would really like to hear the current status of this as I play all my home games there. I added Silvam's (kudos to Silvam!!) park design but still don't know if the factors have been updated.

[venflaalachi]

Originally Posted by Birdland24

Will we ever get the updated Camden Yards model? Kinda sad we are about a year and a half in and still nothing


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Agreed, I find it pretty incredible that they haven't updated Camden Yards yet.

[mars001]

It is my understanding that the park factors are updated and the issue with model is cosmetic. I also understand that they rely on a third party for the stadium models so it isn't in their control to get them updated. This seems like a bad choice to me.

[james17]

Originally Posted by mars001

It is my understanding that they park factors are updated and the issue with model is cosmetic. I also understand that they rely on a third party for the stadium models so it isn't in their control to get them updated. This seems like a bad choice to me.

Well getting the park factors updated is pretty huge for me. Silvam's stadium model is good enough for me for now too.

[Birdland24]

Originally Posted by mars001

It is my understanding that the park factors are updated and the issue with model is cosmetic. I also understand that they rely on a third party for the stadium models so it isn't in their control to get them updated. This seems like a bad choice to me.

I just figured with as real as the game is the cosmetic stuff wouldn’t be that hard. They should be on the third party to want to make it right.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[wallewalls]

If the third party company cannot get this updated after a year and a half, then maybe it is time to find another company to do it. It is a bad look.

Also, their Nationals Park model has had multiple Potomac Nationals logos on it for years, and I guess it will never be updated either.

[Dorfmann]

It's kind of inexcusable at this point. I know that it's "just cosmetic" for most, but I've been managing every game as the Orioles for years. I've no interest in managing 81 games per year in an completely inaccurate ballpark. Yes, Silvam's work is great, but we need the real thing.

[Syd Thrift]

I don't completely disagree here but I do find it funny that we've gone from "3D is just a cheap add-on made to attract casuals" to "Camden Yards is outdated and it's ruining the game for me!". I'm mostly just glad I'm playing in a "historical" league where 100% of the stadia are Silvam works...

[Birdland24]

Originally Posted by Syd Thrift

I don't completely disagree here but I do find it funny that we've gone from "3D is just a cheap add-on made to attract casuals" to "Camden Yards is outdated and it's ruining the game for me!". I'm mostly just glad I'm playing in a "historical" league where 100% of the stadia are Silvam works...

Did anyone say it’s ruining the game?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Syd Thrift]

It’s hurting peoples’ enjoyment of it, clearly, and again I don’t even really disagree with that (like, it’s been close to 2 years now, come on Com2Us). My thing was only to note how a supposedly glossy and frilly add on has turned into a major aspect of immersion now (which I also agree with; I know I didn’t appreciate how awesome 3D was until I started using it and now I can’t do without it).

[Birdland24]

Originally Posted by Syd Thrift

It’s hurting peoples’ enjoyment of it, clearly, and again I don’t even really disagree with that (like, it’s been close to 2 years now, come on Com2Us). My thing was only to note how a supposedly glossy and frilly add on has turned into a major aspect of immersion now (which I also agree with; I know I didn’t appreciate how awesome 3D was until I started using it and now I can’t do without it).

It for sure don’t take away for my love of playing the game. It’s just an I wish thing. Game set a high bar so I think it’s a compliment for the higher expectations.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk