Updated OOTP 23 public beta patch (version 23.6.80) available!

[Matt Arnold]

The graphs might be an issue where the various results charts don't have the same number of data points. It looks like we size each team separately, so we probably just need to coordinate better to make sure they all line up.

[Sweed]

Originally Posted by Matt Arnold

The graphs might be an issue where the various results charts don't have the same number of data points. It looks like we size each team separately, so we probably just need to coordinate better to make sure they all line up.

Well, this morning, I've progressed two days and it seems the graphs are now all correct. I guess it needs a look but, maybe it has sorted itself?

Sorry for the confusion but I did not expect it to fix itself so, figured it best to report before the patch became final. Now, frankly, I don't know what to think

[Matt Arnold]

Originally Posted by Sweed

Well, this morning, I've progressed two days and it seems the graphs are now all correct. I guess it needs a look but, maybe it has sorted itself?



Sorry for the confusion but I did not expect it to fix itself so, figured it best to report before the patch became final. Now, frankly, I don't know what to think

It depends on how many data points and the width. So, for example, day the widget was 400 wide, and the teams all have about 100 games each. If one team has played 99 games, then each game can take up 400/99 = 4.00x wide, or we can set it to 4 and fit safely. If another team has 101 games, then 400/101=3.9x, so using 4 per game for that team will be too much, so we have to drop down to 3.

The correct answer is to pick the same size for each team. We'll fix it up to do it that way, so thanks for reporting

[beepollen]

Thank you for addressing the graphs.

When I shuffle off this mortal coil, who knows what legacy I shall leave behind - but I can take to the bank that I got OOTP to ditch winning percentage in favor of +/- .500.

[uruguru]

Originally Posted by Matt Arnold

It depends on how many data points and the width. So, for example, day the widget was 400 wide, and the teams all have about 100 games each. If one team has played 99 games, then each game can take up 400/99 = 4.00x wide, or we can set it to 4 and fit safely. If another team has 101 games, then 400/101=3.9x, so using 4 per game for that team will be too much, so we have to drop down to 3.

The correct answer is to pick the same size for each team. We'll fix it up to do it that way, so thanks for reporting

Instead of calculating the width of each game and treating it like a constant for all games, you should calculate the start/end points of each game (as float) and then the width of that game is the difference.

for example, 10 games for a team over 45 pixels would result in alternating widths of 4 or 5 pixels for each game, whereas a team with 9 games of course would have exactly 5 pixels for each game.

This will result in all team's total lines ending at the same spot (the rightmost side of the panel) by dynamically sizing as you draw each team's line

I literally had to deal with this exact (EXACT) same problem in a game I developed where I needed to plot lines for data (except each line was part of some historical timeline comparing an an attribute for different alien races).

pseudocode something like this:

int panelWidth = 45;

// totalGames different for each team
int totalGames = 10;

for (int i=0;i<totalGames;i++) {
int startPoint = (int) (panelWidth * i / totalGames);
int endPoint = (int) (panelWidth * (i+i) / totalGames);
drawLineSegment(startPoint,endPoint);
}

[uruguru]

Originally Posted by beepollen

Thank you for addressing the graphs.

When I shuffle off this mortal coil, who knows what legacy I shall leave behind - but I can take to the bank that I got OOTP to ditch winning percentage in favor of +/- .500.

Now if they can only treat the division standings the same way!

[Markus Heinsohn]

Thanks for all the feedback! We have fixed some reported issues and released a new public beta: https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...d.php?t=340198