Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 26 Available - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 26 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-30-2005, 02:25 PM   #21
darkhorse
Hall Of Famer
 
darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 10,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlyons
In fact, the only team in the AL that has a higher proportion of their run scoring come from the homerun is the Texas Rangers, who can be excused for that since they're damn close to the record for homeruns in a season.
A team with Dellucci(2005 version) and Young hitting one and two is gonna score a run or two.
__________________
"The Human Torch was denied a bank loan."
darkhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 02:46 PM   #22
MogulChamp
All Star Reserve
 
MogulChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlyons
The thread that I originally brought this up in is gone for good, so I'll make this point again -- the White Sox are horrible at creating runs outside of the longball. It's pretty much the only way they can score at all. In fact, the only team in the AL that has a higher proportion of their run scoring come from the homerun is the Texas Rangers, who can be excused for that since they're damn close to the record for homeruns in a season. Just because their manager talks about "manufacturing runs" doesn't mean they actually do it.
Yep, that was my 2005 White Sox thread. I am not sure of the actual numbers, but it sure seems like we sacrificed a lot. The team also would move the runner along via the groundball to the right side of the infield, stuff like that. Those things don't show up in the boxscores I am afraid. Iguchi is the best at this.

I argued this ad nauseum in the other thread, so I won't argue this any more. We've clinched. I'm happy. Now to see what sort of havoc this team wreaks in the post season.

One thing to note... During the regular season, Ozzie liked to see what his pitching was made of and would pitch to players in situations where the game could be lost. Ortiz and Haffner come to mind. In the post season, don't be surprised to see the hot/consistent hitters walked every time they come up. Our pitching is that good, that we can pitch around these guys.

I'm tellin ya... think what you want, but we're gonna surprise some people.
MogulChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 02:54 PM   #23
mlyons
Hall Of Famer
 
mlyons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by MogulChamp
Yep, that was my 2005 White Sox thread. I am not sure of the actual numbers, but it sure seems like we sacrificed a lot. The team also would move the runner along via the groundball to the right side of the infield, stuff like that. Those things don't show up in the boxscores I am afraid. Iguchi is the best at this.
Of course, the reason those things aren't showing up in the boxscores is because they're not actually resulting in any runs.
__________________
Things can always be worse.
mlyons is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 03:46 PM   #24
BleacherBum
All Star Reserve
 
BleacherBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 672
Did anyone notice that that 13th inning victory tonight clinched the best record in the AL for the Sox? And only 1 game behind the Cards for overall best.

Plus, with the talk about the Sox limping down the stretch, I checked something: the Sox were 17-12 in September, St. Louis was 13-13. Anyone writin' off the Cards for that poor finish?
__________________
Right Field Sucks!

Last edited by BleacherBum; 09-30-2005 at 03:56 PM.
BleacherBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 07:01 PM   #25
BaseballMan
Hall Of Famer
 
BaseballMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyJ
But what they were doing in the first half of the year was getting flukey performances from multiple players. Which is the outlier, Garland's first half or the rest of his career?

Maybe so but they were also playing smart baseball and doing the little things right. In the 2nd half theyve played like they were an expansion team.
Sure the fluky performances helped but they werent enough to put the whitesox at the top by itself. They were in sync as a team in the first half but in the 2nd half they were about as in sync as a team as Sybil on acid.
No fluke perormance could overcome the way the Whitesox have played in the 2nd half.
How can we say for sure Garland's season is a fluke until at least after next season? How do we know for sure that he hasnt improved? Yeah we can see he sucked in the past so it must be a fluke but if thats so then wouldnt Koufax have been a fluke after his first great season?
You are probably right in that is just a fluke season but i dont think we can say for sure until at least after the next season.
BaseballMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2005, 09:10 PM   #26
JDOldSchool
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coates
Are you an A's fan or White Sox fan (looks like Rowand/Chavez in your avatar.. though I'm probably wrong).
It's Swisher, not Chavez. And here's the story: I grew up in Chicago and a White Sox fan. From 2001-2004 I had to deal with Kenny Williams being an arrogant, lying prick on a regular basis. He made stupid move after stupid move. He brought in guys I despised. Gradually, I just grew less and less interested in a team which had fewer and fewer players I could like and was more and more going to a style of baseball (specifically offense) I didn't like.

Last year was basically the final straw. When Williams traded for Carl Everett the second time, I no longer cared. I wrote an article entitled "The Death of a White Sox fan" for a website (which I don't think exists anymore) called White Sox Central. When Williams went and traded Carlos Lee for Scott Podsednik and Luis Vizcaino, it was pretty much the final straw. Done. I just couldn't take it anymore.

So I just focused on the team that was my second favorite. For a time I figured I would wait out this string of White Sox baseball I didn't like. I figured Williams, Guillen, and the 15 or so Sox players I dislike would be gone within a couple years and I could come back. I don't see that happening now. There's no more than 5 guys on the team who I wish to see do well. Other than that, I just feel absolutely no emotion for this White Sox team. I'm not sure I could ever root for them again.

After a full season of cheering exclusively for the Athletics, things are weird. I still kind of feel like I'm in some kind of baseball fan limbo. I like the A's, I really do. They have a lot of fun-to-watch players and I think they're going to be one of the three best teams in baseball next year. But I have no history with them. My loyalty is mostly based on a philosophy and not a location, childhood preference, or anything like that. It's strange. I think I've become a rather jaded baseball fan: I don't really go into "fan mode" in the way most do. I go into that mode when people start spouting off stupid baseball "knowledge" about playing small ball and things like that. It goes against my philosophy - that's where my real loyalty is.

I guess to put it briefly: I can't root for the White Sox because they don't play baseball I like. I'm an A's fan because they have a general manager who has blazed the trail for the philosophy I embrace. If Billy Beane left the A's and some dope who thought stealing bases was the most important thing in the game, I probably wouldn't be much of an A's fan anymore.

Quote:
Originally Posted by darkhorse
JD is just a fan in general of non-hitting outfielders.
Aaron Rowand: Down year, definitely. Next year he'll return to his 2004 numbers. He's still one of the best defensive CFs in the game. Being a great defensive player at an important defensive position gives a guy a little room for offensive error, IMO.

Nick Swisher: Rookie who is going to be an All-Star one day. I wouldn't say he can't hit... he just can't hit exceptionally well just yet.
JDOldSchool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 12:09 AM   #27
Jestor
Hall Of Famer
 
Jestor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,496
Yay!!! We made it!!!

Between this and finally finding the Little Dinosaur song done by Gin Blossoms live, my weekend is complete.
__________________
Delta Sigma Phi: Better men, better lives.

How To Get A Warning:

Quote:
Originally Posted by jaxmagicman
Mal might have a name file you could use.
Jestor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 02:17 AM   #28
darkhorse
Hall Of Famer
 
darkhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: fort worth, tx
Posts: 10,850
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDOldSchool
Aaron Rowand: Down year, definitely. Next year he'll return to his 2004 numbers. He's still one of the best defensive CFs in the game. Being a great defensive player at an important defensive position gives a guy a little room for offensive error, IMO.

Nick Swisher: Rookie who is going to be an All-Star one day. I wouldn't say he can't hit... he just can't hit exceptionally well just yet.
Kielty weeps at the lack of love shown.
__________________
"The Human Torch was denied a bank loan."
darkhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 08:40 AM   #29
JDOldSchool
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by darkhorse
Kielty weeps at the lack of love shown.
Bobby Kielty: Cool hair, serviceable OF who I feel is underrated and best in a platoon situation.
JDOldSchool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 10:07 AM   #30
WilsonPickett
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
I hate the Sox with a passion. Other than Frank Thomas, I can't think of a single player on this team that I don't like. However, barring the knowledge that both their announcer and play by play announcer are dead, I can only hope they lose every game they play. Oh yeah, Ozzie Guillen is a total asshat also.
WilsonPickett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2005, 10:38 AM   #31
MogulChamp
All Star Reserve
 
MogulChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilsonPickett
I hate the Sox with a passion. Other than Frank Thomas, I can't think of a single player on this team that I don't like. However, barring the knowledge that both their announcer and play by play announcer are dead, I can only hope they lose every game they play. Oh yeah, Ozzie Guillen is a total asshat also.
Wow! Tell us how you really feel. Quite the first post. Lemme guess, Tribe,Twinkies, or Cubs fan?
MogulChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 08:41 PM   #32
WilsonPickett
Bat Boy
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8
Mogul, I am a lifelong Detroit Tigers fan. Hawk Harrelson and Darren Jackson are so annoying that I have to hate the Sox. That being said, they will not be doing the games, so I really want them to defeat the Redsox. As much as I hate the Whitesox's announcers, cant even compare to how much I despise Redsox nation, Johnny Damon and Curt Schilling. Fricken Schilling will probably end up in the Hall due to his bloody sock, while the best big game pitcher of all time (Jack Morris) will be left out. Sniff Glue, don't eat it.
WilsonPickett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 10:04 PM   #33
MogulChamp
All Star Reserve
 
MogulChamp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 656
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilsonPickett
Mogul, I am a lifelong Detroit Tigers fan. Hawk Harrelson and Darren Jackson are so annoying that I have to hate the Sox. That being said, they will not be doing the games, so I really want them to defeat the Redsox. As much as I hate the Whitesox's announcers, cant even compare to how much I despise Redsox nation, Johnny Damon and Curt Schilling. Fricken Schilling will probably end up in the Hall due to his bloody sock, while the best big game pitcher of all time (Jack Morris) will be left out. Sniff Glue, don't eat it.
I do agree with you about Hawk and DJ. Yes they are annoying, but they are huge fans of the team, and aren't afraid to show it. I'm not gonna hold it against them.
MogulChamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 10:51 PM   #34
Raderick
Hall Of Famer
 
Raderick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,737
Ross Gload's clutchness should help White Sox blow passed the AL Playoffs without a problem.
__________________
Raderick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 01:37 AM   #35
BleacherBum
All Star Reserve
 
BleacherBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 672
Problem is, Gload is unlikely to make the playoff roster. The Sox will take 11 pitchers. The 14th position player will probably be Willie Harris, not Gload.
__________________
Right Field Sucks!
BleacherBum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 03:16 AM   #36
UngratefulDead
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 3,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by MogulChamp
One thing to note... During the regular season, Ozzie liked to see what his pitching was made of and would pitch to players in situations where the game could be lost. Ortiz and Haffner come to mind. In the post season, don't be surprised to see the hot/consistent hitters walked every time they come up.
Hmmmm, so a pitching staff whose primary strength is not walking guys should just walk all the best hitters?
Quote:
Originally Posted by MogulChamp
Our pitching is that good, that we can pitch around these guys.
It's not bad, but it's certainly not the best of any of the playoff teams, so I don't think I'd be counting on that one quite so much.
UngratefulDead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 10:28 AM   #37
eriqjaffe
Hall Of Famer
 
eriqjaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Under The Christmas Fish
Posts: 7,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by UngratefulDead
It's not bad, but it's certainly not the best of any of the playoff teams, so I don't think I'd be counting on that one quite so much.
The only other AL team that comes close to being as good is Anaheim. The Sox 3.61 ERA is tied with Cleveland for the third best in the majors, Anaheim is 5th best. The Yankees and Red Sox are both down in the bottom third, each of them around 1 whole run higher than the Sox.

I really think the last week for the Sox showed something - this is a team that was in prime position to roll over and play dead, but they didn't. Sure, Cleveland helped them out with a big choke, but the Sox still won thier last 5, and 8 of their last 10 - I'd call that fairly hot going into the playoffs. And those last three, they could have coasted. Ultimately, it wouldn't have mattered if they had lost all three - but with Cleveland having everything to play for, and the Sox having nothing to play for, the Sox went into the Jake and swept 'em.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BaseballMan
you can still look at the last half the season and see that the Whitesox had trouble scoring runs and have played pretty poorly and going on losing streaks.
Geez, the Sox had one bad month. And only one losing streak longer than four games all year - and don't forget, that 7 game streak in August also had a game rained out in Boston which they were in a position to blow wide freaking open (they were up by three and had two in scoring position with 1 out when the rain delay was called) - if that game hadn't been rained out, the longest losing streak may only have been 5.

Sure, they've had trouble scoring runs. But they still scored enough runs to win ninety-nine games, which ties the 1983 Sox for the second most in franchise history (1 behind the 1917 club).

Quote:
Originally Posted by mlyons
Of course, the reason those things aren't showing up in the boxscores is because they're not actually resulting in any runs.
A runner on second with one out is more likely to score on a single than a runner on first with no outs, right? They're not direct run-producing plays, but that doesn't mean they don't result in runs.

Oh, and Warbuk$ trolling post was lost in the database mess, but let me just say this:



Thanks for reminding baseball what a choke really is.
__________________
eriqjaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 10:46 AM   #38
SWardle
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Seeking my El Dorado
Posts: 548
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
Quote:
Originally Posted by BleacherBum
Did anyone notice that that 13th inning victory tonight clinched the best record in the AL for the Sox? And only 1 game behind the Cards for overall best.

Plus, with the talk about the Sox limping down the stretch, I checked something: the Sox were 17-12 in September, St. Louis was 13-13. Anyone writin' off the Cards for that poor finish?
Well, the Cards were resting their good players down the stretch so one would assume their B team would have a worse record than their A team. I think the Cards will be just fine. They did the same thing last year because they clinched early and people doubted them... they made it farther than 28 other teams. Although, to answer your question, there are some counting out the Cards because of this slump. Harold Reynolds, John Kruk and Peter Gammons to be more specific - then again, they've yet to be right about anything this season.

Steve-O
SWardle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 11:37 AM   #39
eriqjaffe
Hall Of Famer
 
eriqjaffe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Under The Christmas Fish
Posts: 7,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWardle
Harold Reynolds, John Kruk and Peter Gammons to be more specific - then again, they've yet to be right about anything this season.
Which, as a Sox fan, I'm counting on.
__________________
eriqjaffe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 12:23 PM   #40
IatricSB
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: California
Posts: 3,493
I find it funny that on Friday, people on the radio were up in arms because Guillen was resting his starters and most of the callers felt it hurt the Red Sox chances since the White Sox weren't going to try. And yet they swept the Indians.
__________________
Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well preserved body; but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out, and loudly proclaiming, "Wow! What a Ride!"

Chicago(N) - Boys of Summer
Oakland - 20th Century League
Bakersfield - Wild Things
Brooklyn - QBA
Dodge City - NBSL
California - ABC

Dodger's Senioriest fan on the OOTP Boards
IatricSB is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments