|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: Technical Support Do you have a copy of OOTP Baseball 2006? Are you in need of help and assistance in running the game or do you have errors that you need help in resolving? This is your place! |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Sacrifice Fly Bug
Man on third. Fly out to left. Runner heads home, throwing error on the outfielder, runner safe.
Currently the game scores this as follows: an out for the batter, an error on the outfielder, and an RBI for the outfielder. Here's the problem: if the guy scored on an error, the batter should not get the RBI. If he scored on a sac fly, the batter should not get the out, and the outfielder should not get the error. Reality check: in the real world, when a guy flies out and the outfielder throws home wildly, and there are no other runners on base to advance, no error is awarded and the play is scored as a sac fly. This is true even if the throw goes into one of the dugouts. Think about it: if there's only one runner on, and the fly is simply medium-depth, most runners on third will score. Often the throw is not even made. If the outfielder tries to take a remote chance to throw a strike to the plate, he shouldn't be penalized because his throw is off-line. And he isn't. This is a bug. The proper way to score this is as a sac fly - no at-bat, no error and an RBI.
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,725
|
It's actually worse than you say. Often, the game doesn't even give the batter credit for an RBI in this situation. This is one of the few bugs that really, really irritate me in the game, because it screws up a player's statistics.
__________________
Things can always be worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Quote:
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 3,725
|
Quote:
__________________
Things can always be worse. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lafayette IN (by way of Tonawanda NY)
Posts: 1,673
|
I suppose the game log glitches would fall under this category too...
1) Balks not recorded, though base advancements due to balk are recorded 2) Pinch runners not recorded And there's that one when it says the guy was "thrown out at second trying to stretch a double into a triple"... but I forget exactly how that one goes, right now.
__________________
Jeremy from Tonawanda --- Go Cubbies! --- Unofficial Theta Tester(tm) "Oh, we got both kinds. We got country and western!" From OOTP 6: Designated for Assignment FAQ (Includes both problems and solutions! Ooooo! )
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Quote:
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 8,277
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Quote:
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Quote:
Also, has there been any response on the throwing error bug also mentioned in this thread?
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Muscatine, IA
Posts: 8,277
|
I linked to this whole thread Mr. Prez.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Thanks again sporr!
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Since there has still been no word on this, I will now resort to the tactic that proved successful with the intentional walk bug. I will be starting a new thread the first time I see each of the two bugs listed here. Every single time I see it after that I will be bringing it up again. I find it ridiculous that bugs such as this cannot be stamped out once and for all.
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Great White North
Posts: 945
|
And let's not forget the DH not being able to field...
My left fielder gets thrown out arguing balls and strikes... the problem is that my defensive replacement for left is also my DH. Without the ability to move my DH to LF, I have to play a scrub in the field.... in a close game you can't do that... Now, 6.11 is smart enough to tell me that the pitcher would have to hit, how much harder can it be to switch the DH to LF, and then scan the lineup for the old fielder (or just look for the hole) and insert the pitcher into the lineup at that point? I may need to actually trade for a defensive fielder for no other reason than I can't actually make a legal lineup change (because I'm not going to sit my power hitting DH on the bench just in case an outfielder gets tossed again for arguing balls and strikes...)
__________________
"Ruth did it on Beer and Hotdogs..." |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|