|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#21 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: 100% pure adrenaline!
Posts: 5,624
|
Nice pics treches. You can really see the difference between using a digital picture and one that looks to be scanned
__________________
Excess ain't rebellion. You're drinking what they're selling. |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Damned Hell
Posts: 2,150
|
CNNSI and Getty Images' website, respectively, to be exact. The second one I cropped to avoid the watermark and enhanced a bit in photosop. Two seconds operation.
Getty's: (http://editorial.gettyimages.com/ms_...home.aspx?pg=1) Tons of photos there, just use the search feature.
__________________
The Computer Baseball League |
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Damned Hell
Posts: 2,150
|
No prob.
__________________
The Computer Baseball League |
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
I can't figure out how to get the watermark out.
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Damned Hell
Posts: 2,150
|
Unless you go and do some massive editing of the image, you are best served finding one you could use and cut the portion of the watermark. Which player are you looking for?
__________________
The Computer Baseball League |
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Damned Hell
Posts: 2,150
|
Here you have a couple.
__________________
The Computer Baseball League |
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
#30 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 36,205
|
Quote:
IMHO nmleague's makes the lettering much more readable and that improves it greatly. Fine work, nmleague...as you always do. Last edited by Eugene Church; 09-19-2004 at 08:02 PM. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|