CatoBase question

BadluckinOOTP · 07-05-2004, 10:31 PM

I had no problem getting CatoBase to work, but had 1 question... I'm importing my 1903 season right now, and it is taking a while. 1901 took 19 min. 1902 took 28 min. As the years go by and there are more players is it going to take more and more time, or is their a quicker way to do this?

Thanks...

gmo · 07-06-2004, 02:03 AM

You are talking about the entire process including making the HTML pages in those times, right?

Importing the data should always take about the same amount of time, but it will take longer with time to make all the HTML pages because of the growing number of players who are/have been in the league. I have a 12 team league where the amount of time to do everything has increased by 2-3 minutes per year and is now up to around 35 minutes. Not sure what to tell you about the times you've seen so far, except that I would not expect a 50% increase each year.

07-05-2004, 10:31 PM	#1
BadluckinOOTP All Star Starter Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: OKC Posts: 1,534	CatoBase question I had no problem getting CatoBase to work, but had 1 question... I'm importing my 1903 season right now, and it is taking a while. 1901 took 19 min. 1902 took 28 min. As the years go by and there are more players is it going to take more and more time, or is their a quicker way to do this? Thanks... __________________

07-06-2004, 02:03 AM	#2
gmo Hall Of Famer Join Date: May 2002 Location: Longmont, CO Posts: 3,420	You are talking about the entire process including making the HTML pages in those times, right? Importing the data should always take about the same amount of time, but it will take longer with time to make all the HTML pages because of the growing number of players who are/have been in the league. I have a 12 team league where the amount of time to do everything has increased by 2-3 minutes per year and is now up to around 35 minutes. Not sure what to tell you about the times you've seen so far, except that I would not expect a 50% increase each year.