Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Earlier versions of Out of the Park Baseball > Earlier versions of OOTP: Suggestions and Feature Wish List

Earlier versions of OOTP: Suggestions and Feature Wish List Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of OOTP! OOTPBM 2006 is in development, and there is still time left to get your suggestions into the game.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-03-2004, 07:05 PM   #1
phunengames
Minors (Rookie Ball)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 29
Relief for Relievers

Too many middle relivevers can be closers. Being a closer should be special.
phunengames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 04:50 AM   #2
Skipaway
Hall Of Famer
 
Skipaway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
So what's special about Tim Worrell? Rocky Biddle? Joe Borowski? Lance Carter? Did they all attend some kind of closer school before 2003?
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest.
Skipaway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 09:16 AM   #3
SandMan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,946
Re: Relief for Relievers

Quote:
Originally posted by phunengames
Too many middle relivevers can be closers. Being a closer should be special.

Being a closer is not special - BEING A DOMINANT CLOSER IS!!!

Most middle relievers can close - but not all of them well. If you were to put an average MR as a closer he may save 20-25 games for you but probably blow 10-15 or worse yet either lead you teams in WINS or LOSSES. I just ran a season where I had 11 starters on my pitching staff - no MR or CL. My "closer" finished with a 8-14, 3.94 record and 17 saves. This was in a 154 game schedule so my closer was had a decision/save in over 25 percent of the games played. Not good! But he did close - just not very effectively. BTW, my starters started 39,38,34,31,with 2 others with 1 start. My leader in losses was the closer, and I had 2 relievers with 9 wins. Interesting season when your starters get about 20 decisions when they start almost 40 games....

I did not go with this strategy the following year and picked up 5 4-5 star MR in the offseason. I only did this because it appears that the computer AI will often trade you a 4-5 star reliever for a 1-2 star starters so I wanted to see if the lower grade starter was "worth" the same as the reliever - and I put him into MR slots. I may run a season where I only have MR on the team with 5 of them with a E in Durability. I won't change their role just the slot on the rotation - I love using my current league as a TEST environment.....
SandMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2004, 10:12 AM   #4
phunengames
Minors (Rookie Ball)
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 29
Re: Re: Relief for Relievers

Quote:
Originally posted by SandMan
Being a closer is not special - BEING A DOMINANT CLOSER IS!!!

Most middle relievers can close - but not all of them well. If you were to put an average MR as a closer he may save 20-25 games for you but probably blow 10-15 or worse yet either lead you teams in WINS or LOSSES. I just ran a season where I had 11 starters on my pitching staff - no MR or CL. My "closer" finished with a 8-14, 3.94 record and 17 saves. This was in a 154 game schedule so my closer was had a decision/save in over 25 percent of the games played. Not good! But he did close - just not very effectively.
You kind of made my point. All a closer is is a middle reliever that can get the job done in the 9th inning. Not all MR's can be closer and I the the game should reflected it. Not all closers are great some are better than others. It would be nice if the game made havinging a killer closer special and not get some 5 star MR you throw in. If the game is going to have the CL postion it should mean something. In real life not all great MR's make great CL's and not all CL's make great MR's. From starters to relievers every role on the staff is defined. When one cog breaks you have pitching problems. You saw thin is you 11 starter experiment. I would like the game to make having a "DOMINANT CLOSER!!!" be more special and the best way I think you can do that is make the CL special to begin with.
phunengames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 04:05 PM   #5
Gastric ReFlux
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Member #3409
Posts: 8,350
Yeah, the Dodgers were able to spot Eric Gagne in real life because he had the word "Closer" tattooed upon his chest, and they knew they had something special in him. In fact, all real-life closers have that on their chests and OOTP should reflect real life in telling us that a guy has a Closer tag.
Gastric ReFlux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2004, 05:03 PM   #6
Karros270
Hall Of Famer
 
Karros270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,392
Is that why Jose Mesa sucked so bad last year? I think he only had a temporary tatoo.
__________________
now everybody's praying...don't prey on me
Karros270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 12:21 PM   #7
Gastric ReFlux
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Member #3409
Posts: 8,350
Quote:
Originally posted by Karros270
Is that why Jose Mesa sucked so bad last year? I think he only had a temporary tatoo.
Yeah, I'm not sure what happened last year, but Bowa definitely should have had Mesa take off his shirt and check for the tattoo. You shouldn't mess around when you're deciding on your DOMINANT CLOSER--that whole thing of seeing the guy pitch in actual games is overrated, and after the fact. Whereas with Gagne, he's got DOMINANT CLOSER written all over him, that you don't need to do anything like putting him in games to know that he's the ONE.
Gastric ReFlux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-06-2004, 01:03 PM   #8
Karros270
Hall Of Famer
 
Karros270's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,392
Quote:
Originally posted by Gastric ReFlux
Yeah, I'm not sure what happened last year, but Bowa definitely should have had Mesa take off his shirt and check for the tattoo. You shouldn't mess around when you're deciding on your DOMINANT CLOSER--that whole thing of seeing the guy pitch in actual games is overrated, and after the fact. Whereas with Gagne, he's got DOMINANT CLOSER written all over him, that you don't need to do anything like putting him in games to know that he's the ONE.
I always thought Gagne was like Sampson, I thought he got all his power from his goatee but now that you mention it I did notice that he had dominant closer written all over him, I guess that should have been my first clue that he would be so good.
Karros270 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-07-2004, 07:53 PM   #9
ronsantohof
Minors (Double A)
 
ronsantohof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Dermot, KS
Posts: 197
What happened in the ALL-STAR game? Gagne pitched the 8th inning and blew the game. He can only pitch the 9th inning. He's not good enough to pitch any other inning.
__________________
Guilt or innocence, that's not my job. It's my duty to pick up scum-sucking punks like yourself who are accused of a crime. A jury of twelve really stupid people who are easily swayed by rich, fat-cat, slimy lawyers, who'll do anything but tell the truth, will sit in judgment of you. It's as American as a burrito.

Eschew obfuscation.
ronsantohof is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments