Relative OVR/POT ratings very inaccurate in lower levels

[Baconi]

i'm running a pro/rel league, and I noticed that the overall and potential ratings are massively reduced from where they should be if you set it relative to the lower levels - e.g., in the third tier, if you set ratings relative to that league, the best players have an OVR/POT rating of 45, max. This still happens even when their individual ratings are all in the 70s. I attached an example of this but this seems to happen to everyone - and it gets worse the lower the skill level of the league, so the lower you go, the lower everyone's relative ratings in that league are. I've re-scouted, restarted, etc. and still get this issue.

[Sweed]

Not seeing this at all in my standard MLB game. Overalls go up, as they should, when lower level players are set relative to any minor league club.

If I set relative to "rookie ball' almost every player has 80 potential. Go up to A and there are still a lot but less than on rookie. Move up to A+ and that trend continues, ie less 80 ratings but still quite a few. This holds true for every step up I take. With v25's new expanded ratings model the low level clubs have become more accurate in my game, not less.

Perhaps a pro\rel league issue?

[snepp]

I may be mis-remembering, but wasn't something like this happening at release for the KBO league when setting relative to the MLB and it got fixed?

I haven't done my yearly pro/rel league yet or I'd have something more substantial to add.