|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 23 - General Discussions Everything about the brand new 2022 version of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB and the MLBPA. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 32
|
How does "Find a player" work?
Dear forumites,
When I tried to use the "find a player" function and asked for players with a potential of 55, I get a list of players with a potential of 50 (please see the screenshot). Can anyone help me to understand why that is the case? My experience in the past is that if I asked for a list of players with a potential of 55, I should get players with a potential of 55 or above. However, from the example shown here, trying to find players with a 55 potential give me a list of players with potentials of 50,55, and 60, and nothing else. Is this how "find a player" function suppose to work? Last edited by ipodiipodi; 12-26-2022 at 03:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: From Duxbury, Mass residing Baltimore
Posts: 7,566
|
Maybe it is using OSA in the search versus the view of the head scout? Toggle it so it can at least be eliminated as a potential cause. hmmm....
__________________
Complete Universe Facegen Pack 2.0 (mine included) https://www.mediafire.com/file_premi...k_2.0.zip/file Just my Facegen Pack: https://www.mediafire.com/file_premi..._Pack.zip/file |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 32
|
I tried to use OSA and head scout, results are the same in that I am getting people with a 50 potential.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,674
|
What is your scouting accuracy set at?
__________________
I play out every game—one pitch mode. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Jun 2017
Posts: 32
|
I used 100% accuracy. Yes, I had initially suspected this issue is caused by scouting accuracy. But: 1. I turned accuracy to 100%; 2. even if scouting accuracy is an issue, the list of player that is returned to me is all clustered with potentials ranging from 50-60, with no one above or below that range.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 13,106
|
This seems like a bug to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2023
Posts: 9
Infractions: 0/1 (4)
|
Isnt this happening because you are using a scale and not stars since stars arent 100% exact.
change to stars and see if it works any better. could still be bug. but only thing that isnt default is you using stars |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 1,445
|
20-80 is more precise than stars. 13 units vs 10.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|