|
||||
|
|
OOTP 22 - Fictional Simulations Discuss fictional simulations and their results in this forum. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Frankenthal, Germany
Posts: 3,058
|
I need help aligning my teams
I have set up my Fictional Major League Baseball the following way:
I use all current ML teams (Brewers are in AL, Astros in NL) and added the following teams: Brooklyn Dodgers Montreal Expos Philadelphia Athletics St. Louis Browns Three seasons ago I expanded the league with Boston Braves New York Giants Kansas City Athletics Seattle Pilots So I have 4 subleagues with 5 teams each - the schedule ist not a problem, I created one myself. However I'm not really satisfied with the alignment, so do you guys have any thoughts on this or ideas to make it better? Since I'm managing the Brewers I may be biased to move a certain team in or out of "my" division. Thanks in advance for your input
__________________
I'm going to have to meet my Maker some day. And if He asks me why I didn't let this boy play, and I say it's because he's black, that might not be a satisfactory answer. Happy Chandler, 1947 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 252
|
That's an interesting idea to keep both the modern teams and the historical teams from which some them originated. It makes me tempted to propose keeping the modern teams in the same divisions as their derivatives. But. Otherwise, here's my shot at it - keeping all the teams in their original leagues:
OK, for the AL, the problems are figuring which team to add to the AL west since there are only four west coast teams; secondly, what to do with Tamp Bay that is all by itself in the southeast and how to get the Yankees and Red Sox back together. My solution is to add Minnesota to the AL west (it doesn't really want to be there, but it's just about as close to Seattle as Dallas is to Los Angeles). Then we can put Tampa Bay in the central - it's geographically closer to those cities (Dallas, Kansas City and St. Louis) that anywhere else. Also Dallas is basically a plains city and fits just fine with Kansas City. Then we can get New York and Boston back together and have a nice cohesive great lakes division. AL East Boston Red Sox New York Yankees Philadelphia Athletics Baltimore Orioles Washington Senators AL Lakes Toronto Blue Jays Cleveland Indians Detroit Tigers Chicago White Sox Milwaukee Brewers AL Central (or Plains) St. Louis Browns Kansas City Royals Kansas City Athletics Texas Rangers Tampa Bay Rays AL West Seattle Mariners Seattle Pilots Oakland A's Los Angeles Angels Minnesota Twins For the NL, the issues are once again getting New York and Boston in the same division; what to do about Montreal: it goes into the east to make a nice compact NE division, then Philadelphia has to leave. And getting Colorado into the west and Houston out - much closer geographically. Always trade-offs, but here's what I would do: NL East (or NE) Montreal Expos Boston Braves New York Mets New York Giants Brooklyn Dodgers NL Central Chicago Cubs St. Louis Cardinals Milwaukee Braves Cincinnati Reds Pittsburgh Pirates NL South (or SE) Atlanta Braves Miami Marlins Houston Astros Washington Nationals Philadelphia Phillies NL West Los Angeles Dodgers San Diego Padres San Francisco Giants Arizona Diamondbacks Colorado Rockies |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Frankenthal, Germany
Posts: 3,058
|
Thanks for your input. I also put up this question in the "General Discussions"-board because I think not all fictional guys go there all that much and the guys over there probably don't look here.
Your idea is very similar with CD's and both are much better than my setup. fnz put it right, because of the addition of several "pre-60's-teams" the league is overloaded on the eastern side. I think I will use CD's alignment but eventually I might do what The Game said and go with a two division-setup. Thanks again for your help
__________________
I'm going to have to meet my Maker some day. And if He asks me why I didn't let this boy play, and I say it's because he's black, that might not be a satisfactory answer. Happy Chandler, 1947 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sarasota
Posts: 1,939
|
My quick take is they look great.
One change, I'd flip the Tigers with the Browns. Tigers are more north and the teams in that division are good Detroit rivalries. St. Louis with the two KC teams makes a nice fit, too.
__________________
Julien Henri Version 21 https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...22#post4626122 Michigan Town Ball https://forums.ootpdevelopments.com/...28#post4630528 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 653
|
AL Eastern
WAS Senators BAL Orioles NY Yankees TB Rays PHI Athletics AL Northern MIL Brewers TOR Blue Jays DET Tigers MIN Twins BOS Red Sox AL Central CLE Indians KC Royals CHI White Sox STL Browns PIT Pirates AL Western LA Angels COL Rockies SEA Mariners OAK A's TX Rangers NL Eastern WAS Nationals PHI Phillies NY Mets MIA Marlins ATL Braves NL Northern MON Expos MiL Braves BOS Braves BRO Dodgers NY Giants NL Central STL Cardinals CHI Cubs CIN Reds HOU Astros KC Athletics NL Western SEA Pilots LA Dodgers SD Padres SF Giants ARI Diamondbacks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
All Star Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,024
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|