|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#141 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
OK, show me a thread from six months or more ago with "5 or 6 people" asking for females and other genders. Also, it's naive to think that the people participating in this thread are the only people who play OOTP who would want this added.
|
|
|
|
|
#142 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 317
|
I am not totally against adding women to OOTP, though I do not think we need other gender identities, as that might cost you more players than you would gain by adding women and gender identities. That said, I am not against adding the other true gender, in fact as someone who plays historical, I would love to replay the AAGPBL. I doubt this is as easy as some think to add a gender, and get the game to recognize the different genders correctly. Especially if it is done right.
1. The game would need to recognize when it needs to create a female facegen, when dealing with females. 2. Also, play by play would need to be altered to recognize gender, and use correct pronouns. This could be an undertaking in it's own. 3. The development system would need to be altered, because women would need to develop differently, not to mention there is not a lot of data on how women should develop. You do not want a bunch of women developing into MLB players or even being able to play Minor league ball, so you would need to make sure they develop properly. 4. The game would have to recognize the difference between women and men leagues. You do not want men crashing and dominating the women's league. 5. The player creation system would also need to be altered to recognize and create female players differently at a proper talent level. These are just some of the obstacles I could think of, that Markus and company would need to change, when adding women to the OOTP world. I am sure there are others I did not think of. It seems to me that trying to add females would be a pretty big undertaking, for something that is not really going to bring you that much additional business. |
|
|
|
|
#143 | |||||||||
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Well, that's good
Quote:
Quote:
I am not suggesting some people are not that pathetic Quote:
Quote:
Full disclosure, I am not a programmer. Quote:
Again, as a non programmer, I don't see why Is there no way to search the code and replace? Quote:
Again, the game allows for professional male players from nations where no "baseball infrastructure" exists and I don't see any complaints about that. So, this argument against women in the game doesn't make sense to me. Quote:
Quote:
We don't know what the "proper" talent level for players from Tuvalu is, but there aren't many complaints about that. Quote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
#144 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 506
|
Quote:
The thing is with most of what you bring is that it's already been done in other games. If Baseball Mogul was able to introduce women some 10 years or so ago (even in a fictional capacity), there is no reason OOTP can't do it. OOTP is already lightyears ahead, but somehow this particular topic tend to drag behind. There could be a number of reasons for it, but it being too difficult, is in my opinion not one of them. Would it be challenging ? Maybe. Would it be time consuming ? More than likely. It's not like the ask is completely outrageous, like someone demanding a league be created from the Lord of the Rings universe, or like if I was demanding OOTP gets all the teams from my 6000 town and its neighboring villages from Canada in the base game. People are asking that women and their leagues be introduced, as they have been playing the game of baseball for quite a while now. And I'm pretty sure that the amount of special individuals that would be outraged in such a way that they would not ever purchase the game anymore would be so small it would be offset by the amount of new buyers, who then in turn might feel inclined to throw buckets of dollars at the PT cash cow. |
|
|
|
|
|
#145 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#146 | ||
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#147 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,742
|
Speaking of whom, and I am not directing this only at him, but unless I have missed something in this already mammoth thread, I have not seen any official responses. That does not mean they are not noticing and following this discussion, however. It is one definite distinction about this company that it does pay attention to its community.
__________________
- Bru |
|
|
|
|
#148 | |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Dec 2020
Posts: 66
|
Quote:
Edit: And other official friends, hello
Last edited by MaeNekoChan; 12-28-2020 at 04:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#149 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Ban land in 3...2...
Posts: 2,943
|
Yeah
Kinda sad Don't wanna miss out on any of that sweet sweet money from people like this Or don't want to, publicly, align with them |
|
|
|
|
#150 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,397
|
Adding support for multiple genders (including non-binary and trans) is clearly the right thing to do from both the social and business side of the conversation. Given the full expectation that inclusion of multiple genders would by definition be configurable by league (option) I can't see any reasonable argument over the base idea. Like every other feature, it needs to be done well (released without bugs)--and like most complex OOTP features I'd expect it to take a version or three to get working as well as everyone would want it to, but these things go without saying.
Why this is even a discussion says a lot about the world. For my two cents, I'm not sure any official word needs to be made beyond a delivery schedule for when the feature will be included. |
|
|
|
|
#151 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 506
|
Quote:
I don't see it that way. I can understand wanting to take the diplomatic approach and not publicly take a stand one way or another until they are ready to do so. While I agree 100% with including women and their leagues in the game, I also can understand it's a lot easier for me to publicly stand my moral ground - it is not my bottom line that risk being affected. That being said, I don't think their bottom line would be affected at all, and also believe that delivering within the game all the genders with their leagues would give them some nice positive press. This is 2020, the year of wokeness. It's probably, from a PR perspective alone, the best time to do it to be honest. They would get to do the right thing AND get praise for it as a nice bonus. |
|
|
|
|
|
#152 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,291
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#153 | |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 506
|
Quote:
Oh I agree, I'm not saying they have to do it for it. Just that it would be a byproduct of doing the right thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
#154 | |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 162
|
Quote:
It was intended to be a lighthearted and slightly sarcastic remark...after spending about 30 minutes reading the entire thread last night, I noticed that at least half the posts seemed to be the same people arguing back and forth over and over again. I agree that the demand is there and, after reading the thread a second time and ignoring all of the arguing and name-calling posts, there are a lot of great points being made in this thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
#155 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 72
|
I agree with the consensus here and I feel like this would fit into the game pretty easily. Every league can have a box to input what percent of the players created should be women (same thing the game already does with nationality) and below that player creation modifiers for female players. Everyone gets to set it how they want and the devs don’t have to worry about making female players realistic. You could also make female development and aging its own option in case someone wants to tweak that, maybe add the option for female players to be more popular too.
The current facegen for female coaches is probably good enough right now, it’s at least not bad enough to justify not adding female players. Changing the pronouns in articles honestly seems like the hardest part of this, but I can’t imagine it taking too much time to do either. Seems like an obvious addition imo, you get some publicity online and (hopefully) make the OOTP community less of a sausage festival, give a new tool for fictional players to experiment with and add some personality to major leagues that use the option. The only loss is that a few guys online are gonna complain that giving me the ability to recreate A League of Their Own is SJW Marxist propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
#156 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Hucknall, Notts, UK
Posts: 4,902
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#157 |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Boston Ma.
Posts: 1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
#158 | |
|
OOTP Roster Team
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Rocky River, Ohio
Posts: 2,426
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#159 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 86
|
From a developers' point of view I would be wary of promising something and finding out later I couldn't deliver from some logistical point of view. So I don't view a lack of response as a negative necessarily. I hope it's on their radar.
|
|
|
|
|
#160 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Province of Quebec
Posts: 4,094
|
Thanks but no thanks...
There are thing way more important than this non-sense like real 19th century baseball (the real league progression with the real team each seasons and the two missing leagues, PL and UA) and the minor league missing years (1877 to 1913) that should have been done years ago.
__________________
Here I link the FGs I did but aren't included in the pack yet untill the next updates. 1871 to 1884 (500 FGs updated) 1885 to 1888 (212 FGs updated) |
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|