|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Perfect Team 21 Perfect Team 21 - The online revolution! Battle tens of thousands of PT managers from all over the world and become a legend. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Aug 2019
Posts: 145
|
Question on Pack Odds
Happy Saturday Everyone,
Quick question for those in the know... The odds are 1000:1 to pull a Perfect Card, in that 1 of 1000 chance is it the same odds to pull a Babe Ruth as it is a Live Christian Yelich (just an example) Trying to figure out if the odds are the same for any card or if they are skewed to Live or certain cards. Thanks Everyone, and be safe out there!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 2,430
|
It's skewed to Lives because the supply of Live cards is greater.
__________________
Mainline team ![]() SPTT team ![]() Was not a Snag fan...until I saw the fallout once he was gone and realized what a good job he was actually doing. - Ty Cobb |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 13,811
|
Quote:
More precise explanation: *A* live card is more likely to drop than *a* non-live card. (Is it still 70% live? Or did they change it to 65%? Or was it 75% in 19 and they changed it to 70% in 20? Sorry, bit fuzzy on this right now. )Whether a *specific* live card is more likely to drop than a *specific* non-live card depends on the card supply in each group. Now, I have no idea how many historical perfects are in the game right now, but there seems to be precisely 11 live perfects. If live perfects drop at a rate of 70%, then 6.36% of all perfect cards will be a specific live card, say, Max Scherzer (which is the only one I have). Since there is definitely *more* than 11 historical perfects, and they only represent 30% of the perfect cards, the odds are going to be much smaller for each individual historical perfect. At 20 cards it would be 1.5%; at 30 cards 1%; ... you get the idea.
__________________
Portland Raccoons, 92 years of excell-.... of baseball: Furballs here! 1983 * 1989 * 1991 * 1992 * 1993 * 1995 * 1996 * 2010 * 2017 * 2018 * 2019 * 2026 * 2028 * 2035 * 2037 * 2044 * 2045 * 2046 * 2047 * 2048 * 2051 * 2054 * 2055 * 2061 1 OSANAI : 2 POWELL : 7 NOMURA | RAMOS : 8 REECE : 10 BROWN : 15 HALL : 27 FERNANDEZ : 28 CASAS : 31 CARMONA : 32 WEST : 39 TONER : 46 SAITO Resident Mets Cynic - The Mets from 1962 onwards, here. Last edited by Westheim; 04-11-2020 at 02:44 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,366
|
Last year it was 70% live 30% historical for players bronze and above. Nothing was said about this being changed except there are a LOT more iron historical players, so maybe it is 70-30 for all classes?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Nov 2018
Posts: 82
|
In 742 packs, I'm running right around 30% for Bronze and above (29.81% to be exact) and about 15% for Irons (15.55%)
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|