Arbitration Numbers Didn't Match - Page 2

Whoofe · 07-23-2018, 12:11 PM

sounds like a bug then, yeah

$100-200k is fairly trivial when you are talking teams $100-200m budgets, but it still would be nice to have it corrected

Matt Arnold · 07-23-2018, 01:14 PM

Yeah, it looks like we were applying a min value of 50% above league min. I don't see why we should so we'll fix that up for the next patch. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

torpidbeaver · 07-24-2018, 03:01 AM

Yay, I’m helping!

Thanks for confirming. It warms my cold, stone-filled, ScroogeMcDuckian heart to know I helped my fellow GMs save a couple hundred grand on a very narrow subset of contracts by artificially depressing salaries on league-minimum players through ruthless use of arbitration.

NoOne · 07-24-2018, 05:47 PM

yeah, instead of enjoying a night at the bar they are fixing this mistake...

great news for the video game: more money to spend. nom, nom, nom, nom

RchW · 07-24-2018, 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by torpidbeaver

Yay, I’m helping!

Thanks for confirming. It warms my cold, stone-filled, ScroogeMcDuckian heart to know I helped my fellow GMs save a couple hundred grand on a very narrow subset of contracts by artificially depressing salaries on league-minimum players through ruthless use of arbitration.

Good catch!. The screenshots helped.

torpidbeaver · 12-01-2018, 04:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt Arnold

Yeah, it looks like we were applying a min value of 50% above league min. I don't see why we should so we'll fix that up for the next patch. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

Hi, Matt. Wanted to mention that I'm still seeing this same issue. I'm on version 19.7.

Was it actually a bug, then?

07-23-2018, 12:11 PM	#21
Whoofe All Star Reserve Join Date: Mar 2016 Posts: 590	sounds like a bug then, yeah $100-200k is fairly trivial when you are talking teams $100-200m budgets, but it still would be nice to have it corrected

07-23-2018, 01:14 PM	#22
Matt Arnold OOTP Developer Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 16,153	Yeah, it looks like we were applying a min value of 50% above league min. I don't see why we should so we'll fix that up for the next patch. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.

07-24-2018, 03:01 AM	#23
torpidbeaver Major Leagues Join Date: Aug 2011 Posts: 391	Yay, I’m helping! Thanks for confirming. It warms my cold, stone-filled, ScroogeMcDuckian heart to know I helped my fellow GMs save a couple hundred grand on a very narrow subset of contracts by artificially depressing salaries on league-minimum players through ruthless use of arbitration.

07-24-2018, 05:47 PM	#24
NoOne Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 7,273 Infractions: 0/1 (3)	yeah, instead of enjoying a night at the bar they are fixing this mistake... great news for the video game: more money to spend. nom, nom, nom, nom