So Many Starting Pitchers With 100 Stuff in Future

camerondrucker · 05-22-2016, 11:03 PM

Why is this? Scouting accuracy at 100% and there is like 30 starting pitchers with 100 "stuff" rating in my MLB game in year 2030.

Hammercraft · 05-22-2016, 11:24 PM

That seems pretty unusual. I have seen the numbers creep up, but not that much and not that fast - and somehow they never dominate like Kershaw does

MrBojangles · 05-22-2016, 11:56 PM

Gonna be tough to be a hitter in that league.

camerondrucker · 08-16-2016, 11:15 PM

Still seeing every time i get deep into the future, anyone know what i can do to help this? I have almost every setting set to default...

Huckleberry · 08-16-2016, 11:56 PM

That's crazy. Are you sure you don't have it set to show ratings relative to a league, maybe one of your minor leagues? I know you said it's all defaults but I can't think of anything else.

james17 · 08-17-2016, 12:39 AM

Looks like a bug. Several of those starters are past age 30 and are nowhere near hitting 100 for stuff.

camerondrucker · 08-17-2016, 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huckleberry

That's crazy. Are you sure you don't have it set to show ratings relative to a league, maybe one of your minor leagues? I know you said it's all defaults but I can't think of anything else.

Nope nothing like. I have no idea why this is happening this is just standard mlb league...

camerondrucker · 08-17-2016, 01:12 AM

When i play with ratings relative to the MLB it sorts out obviously but it still doesnt make sense why this is happening. Do they think every pitcher in the future will be the next Big Unit lol

BigRed75 · 08-17-2016, 01:26 AM

Maybe it's 100 stuff relative to the entire world's population?

hcorry2001 · 08-17-2016, 04:23 AM

Lmaooo

Griever20 · 08-17-2016, 05:21 AM

Just an idea:

Maybe go to settings -> global settings and hit the Recalc All Ratings + Run Full Re-Scouting button on the left once and see if things change, could be a small bug there, I think I've read about this somehere in the forums.

NoOne · 08-17-2016, 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammercraft

That seems pretty unusual. I have seen the numbers creep up, but not that much and not that fast - and somehow they never dominate like Kershaw does

i think i meant to quote something else, but this is part of that line of thought, anyway.

Do you use auto-calc? if all the batters have 100, 200, or even all 1 power rating, homeruns will be fairly evenly distributed after hitting auto-calc (rates, not totals). otherwise, you get the domination of the batters, unless they too are increasing in talent at relatively the same rate as pitchers overtime. there are a few possible factors at play that can cause different results.

camerondrucker · 08-17-2016, 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NoOne

i think i meant to quote something else, but this is part of that line of thought, anyway.

Do you use auto-calc? if all the batters have 100, 200, or even all 1 power rating, homeruns will be fairly evenly distributed after hitting auto-calc (rates, not totals). otherwise, you get the domination of the batters, unless they too are increasing in talent at relatively the same rate as pitchers overtime. there are a few possible factors at play that can cause different results.

Not sure what auto calc is and i also tried run full re calc on ratings and that didnt change anything either. No idea why this is happening..

ThePretender · 08-17-2016, 09:28 PM

A lot of those pitchers are useless given the low movement. Wouldn't play at least 11 of them if I was trying to compete. Probably more.

PSUColonel · 08-17-2016, 09:33 PM

uncheck then re-check ratings relative...then see if it's still like that. report back here

camerondrucker · 08-17-2016, 11:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUColonel

uncheck then re-check ratings relative...then see if it's still like that. report back here

Ratings didn't change a bit....

PSUColonel · 08-18-2016, 12:43 AM

Are your ratings relative to a lesser minor league?

camerondrucker · 08-18-2016, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PSUColonel

Are your ratings relative to a lesser minor league?

No they are not. Everything is set to default in regards to ratings.

Huckleberry · 08-18-2016, 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camerondrucker

No they are not. Everything is set to default in regards to ratings.

You probably don't want to ruin things by doing this, but can you go into the player editor for a few of them to verify it's not a display issue but those are actually high ratings?

If you don't want to see names you could actually export the player_pitching csv file, delete the player_id and name columns, then sort by stuff to see how many players have ridiculously high stuff ratings in your game.

Questdog · 08-18-2016, 01:29 PM

This is easily fixable, by switching to the 1-5 scale and then no pitcher will have STUFF anywhere near 100......

Seriously, though, I would check the Player Creation Modifiers.

05-22-2016, 11:03 PM	#1
camerondrucker Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: May 2015 Posts: 28	So Many Starting Pitchers With 100 Stuff in Future Why is this? Scouting accuracy at 100% and there is like 30 starting pitchers with 100 "stuff" rating in my MLB game in year 2030. Attached Images

08-17-2016, 01:26 AM	#9
BigRed75 Hall Of Famer Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 2,423	Maybe it's 100 stuff relative to the entire world's population? __________________ Mainline team SPTT team Was not a Snag fan...until I saw the fallout once he was gone and realized what a good job he was actually doing. - Ty Cobb

08-17-2016, 05:21 AM	#11
Griever20 Hall Of Famer Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Dortmund, Germany Posts: 3,723	Just an idea: Maybe go to settings -> global settings and hit the Recalc All Ratings + Run Full Re-Scouting button on the left once and see if things change, could be a small bug there, I think I've read about this somehere in the forums. __________________ The Montreal Expos... Exposing the New MLB? MLB 2015 - Being the Brewmaster(ended) MLB 2013: The Blue Jays That Never Were(concluded)

08-18-2016, 12:43 AM	#17
PSUColonel Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 13,140	Are your ratings relative to a lesser minor league? Attached Images Last edited by PSUColonel; 08-18-2016 at 12:46 AM.

08-18-2016, 01:29 PM	#20
Questdog Hall Of Famer Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases...... Posts: 16,142	This is easily fixable, by switching to the 1-5 scale and then no pitcher will have STUFF anywhere near 100...... Seriously, though, I would check the Player Creation Modifiers. Last edited by Questdog; 08-18-2016 at 01:33 PM.

05-22-2016, 11:24 PM	#2
Hammercraft All Star Reserve Join Date: Jan 2015 Location: Wisconsin Posts: 728	That seems pretty unusual. I have seen the numbers creep up, but not that much and not that fast - and somehow they never dominate like Kershaw does

05-22-2016, 11:56 PM	#3
MrBojangles All Star Reserve Join Date: Apr 2016 Location: low and inside Posts: 568	Gonna be tough to be a hitter in that league.

08-16-2016, 11:15 PM	#4
camerondrucker Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: May 2015 Posts: 28	Still seeing every time i get deep into the future, anyone know what i can do to help this? I have almost every setting set to default...

08-16-2016, 11:56 PM	#5
Huckleberry All Star Reserve Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 581	That's crazy. Are you sure you don't have it set to show ratings relative to a league, maybe one of your minor leagues? I know you said it's all defaults but I can't think of anything else.

08-17-2016, 12:39 AM	#6
james17 All Star Starter Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,305	Looks like a bug. Several of those starters are past age 30 and are nowhere near hitting 100 for stuff.

08-17-2016, 01:12 AM	#8
camerondrucker Minors (Rookie Ball) Join Date: May 2015 Posts: 28	When i play with ratings relative to the MLB it sorts out obviously but it still doesnt make sense why this is happening. Do they think every pitcher in the future will be the next Big Unit lol

08-17-2016, 04:23 AM	#10
hcorry2001 Minors (Single A) Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: New York City Posts: 80	Lmaooo

08-17-2016, 09:28 PM	#14
ThePretender All Star Starter Join Date: Mar 2008 Posts: 1,331	A lot of those pitchers are useless given the low movement. Wouldn't play at least 11 of them if I was trying to compete. Probably more.

08-17-2016, 09:33 PM	#15
PSUColonel Hall Of Famer Join Date: Feb 2002 Posts: 13,140	uncheck then re-check ratings relative...then see if it's still like that. report back here