Rating Scale Question

[Klew1986]

I typically use 1-100 scale but am thinking about switching to 1-20 for my Twins game.

Does that mean a pitcher who is rated 60-60-60 is translated to 12-12-12 or is it more complicated than that?

[Honorable_Pawn]

Originally Posted by Klew1986

I typically use 1-100 scale but am thinking about switching to 1-20 for my Twins game.

Does that mean a pitcher who is rated 60-60-60 is translated to 12-12-12 or is it more complicated than that?

I'm pretty sure that's all it is. A 62 would be a 12 and a 63 would be a 13.

[Huckleberry]

Yes, all the ratings scales are linear except for 20-80, at least that's what I believe is still true:

http://www.ootpdevelopments.com/boar...-80-scale.html

[Klew1986]

What do you all consider a good pitcher on a 1-20 scale? 13-13-13?

[DustinthePOWERHOUSE]

Originally Posted by Klew1986

What do you all consider a good pitcher on a 1-20 scale? 13-13-13?

I don't know how to translates but my feeling for that would be a 50 fv pitcher type. So around average. Cause 14-16 is 60fv and 16-18 70fv 18-20 80fv (fv=future value)

But I just kind of made that up so I'm not sure that's really accurate.

[Hammercraft]

Originally Posted by Klew1986

What do you all consider a good pitcher on a 1-20 scale? 13-13-13?

That's a solid pitcher. The 'stuff' seems to be a little more important than the other two

[Honorable_Pawn]

Originally Posted by Hammercraft

That's a solid pitcher. The 'stuff' seems to be a little more important than the other two

Maybe, maybe not.

If I have a guy with low stuff and he is a fly ball pitcher I will field great defenders in the outfield. Vice versa for ground ball pitchers. This strategy will greatly reduce BABIP.

So, I tend to treat control as the most important.