Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Out of the Park Baseball 17 > OOTP 17 - General Discussions

OOTP 17 - General Discussions Everything about the latest Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA.

View Poll Results: How should I expand?
Option A 4 16.00%
Option B 4 16.00%
Option C 12 48.00%
Other (Please reply with your suggestion) 5 20.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2016, 04:00 PM   #1
oriolesmeep
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
How Would you Expand/Realign?

I'm nearing the 30th season of play in my fictional league, which will likely be started in OOTP 17.

To celebrate the release of both OOTP 17 and entering my 30th season, I've decided to expand my league. Only problem - I'm not sure how to.

I've decided to add a team in Salt Lake City and Pittsburgh. Right now, there's 32 teams, 2 sub-leagues, 4 divisions with 4 teams each. Only the division winners make the playoffs. It leads to some very good teams missing out entirely, but also (in my opinion) adds some excitement to the playoff race, when 2 95 win teams are fighting for one playoff spot.

Adding 2 teams gives me 34, which doesn't divide nicely. I could add more, but I haven't done more than 2 at a time before and I don't want to drain teams of talent.

So my options are:

A. Expand to 34, putting Salt Lake City in the Southwest Division and Pittsburgh in the Central Division. Downside - the divisions aren't even.

B. Realign into 2 divisions in each sub league, the East and the West. Downside - extra work and having to institute wild cards, and the divisions still aren't even (though with 8/9 teams per division it means less).

C. Expand to 36 teams, and re-align into 6 6-team divisions. Downside - starting to have too many teams to keep track of, may drain talent, and 3 divisions also would make me have to institute wild cards.

I haven't decided, though I am certain I want to expand. Any other suggestions are welcome.
oriolesmeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 04:04 PM   #2
bwburke94
Hall Of Famer
 
bwburke94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,523
Here's the big question - are you truly opposed to wild cards in any case, or are you willing to expand the playoffs if you expand to 36 teams?
bwburke94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 04:09 PM   #3
oriolesmeep
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwburke94 View Post
Here's the big question - are you truly opposed to wild cards in any case, or are you willing to expand the playoffs if you expand to 36 teams?
Personally, I'm not, but for this league I don't want to put them in if at all possible.
oriolesmeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 05:49 PM   #4
Bluenoser
Hall Of Famer
 
Bluenoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
This is my current setup (your option C).

3 division winners and 1 WC make the playoffs. No DH, No interleague, 26 man rosters.
Attached Images
Image 
Bluenoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 05:54 PM   #5
oriolesmeep
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenoser View Post
This is my current setup (your option C).

3 division winners and 1 WC make the playoffs. No DH, No interleague, 26 man rosters.
How was the talent level in your league immediately after expanding? I'm afraid that adding 6 teams at a time might lead to career AA-caliber players earning starting jobs at the big league level.
oriolesmeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 06:32 PM   #6
Bluenoser
Hall Of Famer
 
Bluenoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by oriolesmeep View Post
How was the talent level in your league immediately after expanding? I'm afraid that adding 6 teams at a time might lead to career AA-caliber players earning starting jobs at the big league level.
I didn't expand, I created the league like that from scratch. I wouldn't expand by 6 teams all at once, that would thin the talent for a few years. If I were doing it via expansion, I'd probably add 2 teams every 5 years.
Bluenoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2016, 09:26 PM   #7
'94 EXPOS
Major Leagues
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 323
36 teams

4 nine team divisions in two sub-leagues

Top 2 from each division get into play-offs

From my experience: you don't have any wildcards and rarely will a deserving team miss the playoffs
'94 EXPOS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 11:06 AM   #8
The Game
Hall Of Famer
 
The Game's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Inside The Game
Posts: 30,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenoser View Post
This is my current setup (your option C).

3 division winners and 1 WC make the playoffs. No DH, No interleague, 26 man rosters.
why have both Canadian teams in the NL but still have Houston in the NL?
__________________
Go today don't wait for tomorrow
It isn't promised, all the time you get borrowed
Don't live your life for other people
Don't bottle your emotions till they crack and fill a couple just sorrows
Take your mind and refocus go get a paper write your goals out
Throw your middle fingers to all your haters


"Stay Strong"


The Game is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 11:23 AM   #9
Bluenoser
Hall Of Famer
 
Bluenoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Game View Post
why have both Canadian teams in the NL but still have Houston in the NL?
My personal preference, that's all. Rivalry between Tor/Mon, and also Bal/Was.

There's still a Canadian team in the AL West. Rivalry with Sea.

I put Houston back where they belonged and Milwaukee back where they belonged.

Again, all personal preference - ymmv

Last edited by Bluenoser; 03-13-2016 at 11:25 AM.
Bluenoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 12:07 PM   #10
Padreman
Hall Of Famer
 
Padreman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico (formally San Diego, CA.)
Posts: 4,131
I have 36 teams once I did have 4 divisions
East, West, Midwest and Central you can do that and have the 4 division winners make the playoffs
__________________

Chargers= Despicable Traitors
Padreman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 01:07 PM   #11
Le Grande Orange
Hall Of Famer
 
Le Grande Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by '94 EXPOS View Post
36 teams

4 nine team divisions in two sub-leagues

Top 2 from each division get into play-offs

From my experience: you don't have any wildcards and rarely will a deserving team miss the playoffs
I'd say that depends on your schedule.

If you have a balanced schedule, then the divisions are arbitrary, and a wild card qualifier is more legitimate since its record is transferable to any division due to the balanced schedule. If you have a divisionally-weighted schedule, then the division winners have legitimacy but wild card qualifiers are questionable.
Le Grande Orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 02:35 PM   #12
The Game
Hall Of Famer
 
The Game's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Inside The Game
Posts: 30,937
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenoser View Post
My personal preference, that's all. Rivalry between Tor/Mon, and also Bal/Was.

There's still a Canadian team in the AL West. Rivalry with Sea.

I put Houston back where they belonged and Milwaukee back where they belonged.

Again, all personal preference - ymmv
Didnt notice Milwaukee. I hated the Brewers when they played in the AL. Phil Garner led teams always started a fight. i always keep states with just 2 teams in separate leagues.
__________________
Go today don't wait for tomorrow
It isn't promised, all the time you get borrowed
Don't live your life for other people
Don't bottle your emotions till they crack and fill a couple just sorrows
Take your mind and refocus go get a paper write your goals out
Throw your middle fingers to all your haters


"Stay Strong"


The Game is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 04:13 PM   #13
Bluenoser
Hall Of Famer
 
Bluenoser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Game View Post
Didnt notice Milwaukee. I hated the Brewers when they played in the AL. Phil Garner led teams always started a fight. i always keep states with just 2 teams in separate leagues.
I remember and enjoyed the days of Harvey's Wallbangers
Bluenoser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2016, 05:19 PM   #14
jokerhusky1129
Major Leagues
 
jokerhusky1129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 456
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluenoser View Post
This is my current setup (your option C).

3 division winners and 1 WC make the playoffs. No DH, No interleague, 26 man rosters.
Wow, you put Washington in the AL too? I thought I was the only one. I also rename them the Senators (Nationals in the AL? Haha).

Anyways, what I do is I don't expand. 30 teams to me is best. Put Washington and Milwaukee in the AL, and Houston back in the NL. Two divisions in each, 5 teams make the playoffs. Division winners get a bye along with the highest rated wild card (We'll call them the Super Wild Card). One game playoff for the Wild Card Playoff, best of 7 division series, championship series, and World Series. I make the DH universal, so at that point, I name them the American and National Conference.
jokerhusky1129 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 11:36 AM   #15
OakDragon
Hall Of Famer
 
OakDragon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 3,494
I voted "Other" and I'd go with '94 Expos' suggestion.
OakDragon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2016, 11:58 AM   #16
T-Bone
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Freehold
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by '94 EXPOS View Post
36 teams

4 nine team divisions in two sub-leagues

Top 2 from each division get into play-offs

From my experience: you don't have any wildcards and rarely will a deserving team miss the playoffs
This one
T-Bone is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments