|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| OOTP 17 - General Discussions Everything about the latest Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB.com and the MLBPA. |
| View Poll Results: How should I expand? | |||
| Option A |
|
4 | 16.00% |
| Option B |
|
4 | 16.00% |
| Option C |
|
12 | 48.00% |
| Other (Please reply with your suggestion) |
|
5 | 20.00% |
| Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
|
How Would you Expand/Realign?
I'm nearing the 30th season of play in my fictional league, which will likely be started in OOTP 17.
To celebrate the release of both OOTP 17 and entering my 30th season, I've decided to expand my league. Only problem - I'm not sure how to. I've decided to add a team in Salt Lake City and Pittsburgh. Right now, there's 32 teams, 2 sub-leagues, 4 divisions with 4 teams each. Only the division winners make the playoffs. It leads to some very good teams missing out entirely, but also (in my opinion) adds some excitement to the playoff race, when 2 95 win teams are fighting for one playoff spot. Adding 2 teams gives me 34, which doesn't divide nicely. I could add more, but I haven't done more than 2 at a time before and I don't want to drain teams of talent. So my options are: A. Expand to 34, putting Salt Lake City in the Southwest Division and Pittsburgh in the Central Division. Downside - the divisions aren't even. B. Realign into 2 divisions in each sub league, the East and the West. Downside - extra work and having to institute wild cards, and the divisions still aren't even (though with 8/9 teams per division it means less). C. Expand to 36 teams, and re-align into 6 6-team divisions. Downside - starting to have too many teams to keep track of, may drain talent, and 3 divisions also would make me have to institute wild cards. I haven't decided, though I am certain I want to expand. Any other suggestions are welcome. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Belchertown, MA, USA
Posts: 4,523
|
Here's the big question - are you truly opposed to wild cards in any case, or are you willing to expand the playoffs if you expand to 36 teams?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
|
This is my current setup (your option C).
3 division winners and 1 WC make the playoffs. No DH, No interleague, 26 man rosters. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 103
|
How was the talent level in your league immediately after expanding? I'm afraid that adding 6 teams at a time might lead to career AA-caliber players earning starting jobs at the big league level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
|
I didn't expand, I created the league like that from scratch. I wouldn't expand by 6 teams all at once, that would thin the talent for a few years. If I were doing it via expansion, I'd probably add 2 teams every 5 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 323
|
36 teams
4 nine team divisions in two sub-leagues Top 2 from each division get into play-offs From my experience: you don't have any wildcards and rarely will a deserving team miss the playoffs |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Inside The Game
Posts: 30,937
|
why have both Canadian teams in the NL but still have Houston in the NL?
__________________
Go today don't wait for tomorrow It isn't promised, all the time you get borrowed Don't live your life for other people Don't bottle your emotions till they crack and fill a couple just sorrows Take your mind and refocus go get a paper write your goals out Throw your middle fingers to all your haters "Stay Strong"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
|
Quote:
![]() There's still a Canadian team in the AL West. Rivalry with Sea. ![]() I put Houston back where they belonged and Milwaukee back where they belonged. Again, all personal preference - ymmv
Last edited by Bluenoser; 03-13-2016 at 11:25 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Tijuana, Baja California, Mexico (formally San Diego, CA.)
Posts: 4,131
|
I have 36 teams once I did have 4 divisions
East, West, Midwest and Central you can do that and have the 4 division winners make the playoffs
__________________
![]() Chargers= Despicable Traitors |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,642
|
Quote:
If you have a balanced schedule, then the divisions are arbitrary, and a wild card qualifier is more legitimate since its record is transferable to any division due to the balanced schedule. If you have a divisionally-weighted schedule, then the division winners have legitimacy but wild card qualifiers are questionable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Inside The Game
Posts: 30,937
|
Didnt notice Milwaukee. I hated the Brewers when they played in the AL. Phil Garner led teams always started a fight. i always keep states with just 2 teams in separate leagues.
__________________
Go today don't wait for tomorrow It isn't promised, all the time you get borrowed Don't live your life for other people Don't bottle your emotions till they crack and fill a couple just sorrows Take your mind and refocus go get a paper write your goals out Throw your middle fingers to all your haters "Stay Strong"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In The Moment
Posts: 14,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 456
|
Quote:
Anyways, what I do is I don't expand. 30 teams to me is best. Put Washington and Milwaukee in the AL, and Houston back in the NL. Two divisions in each, 5 teams make the playoffs. Division winners get a bye along with the highest rated wild card (We'll call them the Super Wild Card). One game playoff for the Wild Card Playoff, best of 7 division series, championship series, and World Series. I make the DH universal, so at that point, I name them the American and National Conference. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: San Jose, CA USA
Posts: 3,494
|
I voted "Other" and I'd go with '94 Expos' suggestion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Freehold
Posts: 159
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|