|
||||
|
|
Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,280
|
I'm going to enjoy watching Cano strike out.
And years from now, when he's around 37, 38, I'm going to enjoy watching Mariners management and ownership squirm when this guy is batting .220 and they're still forking over $24 million a year to him.
A case of a bitter Yankee fan disappointed by free agency not going his way (for a change)? Not really. Look at this video for a clue as to what is bothering me: New York Yankees not angry at Robinson Cano, felt sorry for him - ESPN New York Why can't these fools just take the money and shut up? Why do they have to flap their gums to the media? "It's not about the money," he says. Except in the next breath, he talks about the security of the extra three years that Seattle offered him, up to age 41. Because it IS about the money. Oh, and the Mariners gave him love and respect. The Yankees treated him badly. Yeah, right. They offered him only $175 million for seven years, an average of $25 million a year (versus the $24 million per year he has now) and that was HIGHLY disrespectful. Yes. Like the dumbass thought the Yankees should repeat the mistake they made with the A-Rod contract. Now it's the Mariners turn to learn that lesson. Good riddance. He's a great ballplayer, no question. He used to knock my socks off with some of the plays he made, with the beautiful swing that he has. I will miss that, but I will not miss him anymore. Not about the money? What a lying sack of you-know-what. At least take the money and don't look stupid talking about being treated badly at $25 million a year. ![]()
__________________
- Bru Last edited by Déjà Bru; 12-13-2013 at 11:19 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,280
|
Just this, then I'll move on.
Quote:
I highlighted that last part. Remember now, it wasn't about the money. Yeah, right. Cano is going to hit his homers against the Yankees for sure. But when he strikes out, I will be celebrating all the more because it's him. And when he doesn't run out a fly ball the way he should, as I've seen him do often, I will smile instead of frowning.
__________________
- Bru Last edited by Déjà Bru; 12-14-2013 at 12:21 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,331
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases......
Posts: 16,142
|
Hilarious to see Yankee fans upset that someone signed away one of their favorites......welcome to the world the rest of us have been living in for 35 years!
Bottom line: Yankees were probably smart not to go 10 years and Cano would be stupid not to take the Seattle contract. I think baseball ought to make a rule limiting the length of contracts. If anything is going to kill baseball it is the old players who aren't worth a crap sucking millions and millions out of the baseball economy. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Indiana
Posts: 9,847
Infractions: 1/0 (0)
|
Quote:
I wish someone would disrespect me with a $175 million contract. I would work for 7, 10, or however many years they want. ![]() I listened to Cano's news conference on MLB radio, and I thought he came across as arrogant and whiny. For whatever that's worth. 2 cents, I suppose. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,280
|
Quote:
Second paragraph: That's now a "rule" for the Yankees, as Steinbrenner or Cashman said. No more 10-year contracts for guys 30 and older. Gee, I wonder why. Third paragraph: Right on. What a friggin' waste of fan dollars. Quote:
![]()
__________________
- Bru Last edited by Déjà Bru; 12-14-2013 at 01:29 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
Quote:
Boston, St. Louis and somewhat differently Tampa and Oakland have shown that alternative team building strategies work, while maintaining a healthy market for good second tier FA players. What would really help is quicker free agency, say 3 or 4 years. This would force teams to make decisions on younger players. You would see bigger/longer contracts for mid 20's players and it would limit the demands from 30+ players who did not perform up to their initial big contract. The down side is that it may screw small market teams from leveraging young talent on the trade market because the big market teams could just wait for FA. The Players Association is unlikely to want early FA because its own members are quite happy with the status quo. Any attempt to limit FA contracts would likely cause a strike. I'd suggest that half of the teams don't want it either. Limiting the earnings of young players gives older average and below average players access to a much bigger piece of the pie than they deserve. The majority of players like that just fine. Life ain't fair. ![]()
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,280
|
I sympathize with Qd's sentiment but I agree with your reasoning. Free market = free agency = free market. Buyer beware.
__________________
- Bru |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,331
|
Quote:
But I don't always agree with the last part. I don't know what situation Cano was in so most likely it is a good decision on his part. But for me, if I had a wife and young kids established in a state that I like, I'm not ripping all that away and relocating if they are already offering me 175 million! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: In a dark, damp cave where I'm training slugs to run the bases......
Posts: 16,142
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Zürich, Switzerland
Posts: 8,608
|
7 years from now, 24 million a year will look different than now. TV money is about to drastically alter baseball and in the next decade the sport will look completely different.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto ON by way of Glasgow UK
Posts: 15,629
|
Quote:
__________________
Cheers RichW If you’re looking for a good cause to donate money to please consider a Donation to Parkinson’s Canada. It may help me have a better future and if not me, someone else. Thanks. “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,331
|
Quote:
When you have tons of money you look to live as comfortably as possible. And there comes a point where extra money isn't going to enhance your life. Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 181
|
Tony Gwynn could have made significantly more money in his day but liked living in San Diego and didn't want to uproot his family.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 11,280
|
At the risk of appearing to object too much, thereby proving the allegation of spoiled, bitter, and disappointed Yankee fan, here is another ex-Yankee for whom the team was "outbid" (well, they didn't try too hard in this case): Curtis Granderson.
Grandy took the money and ran but do you hear him woofing about how "badly" he was treated, how it's not about the money but the love and respect the Mets have given him, poor boy? No. What I do hear about him this morning is this: A special place to play ball -- thanks to Curtis Granderson I rooted for Granderson when he was a Yankee because he was a Yankee. Now I will be rooting for Granderson, in spite of his being a Met, because of the man that he is.
__________________
- Bru |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 3,481
|
Cano's numbers will nosedive in Seattle so you should be happy come April. Extreme hitters park to extreme pitchers part.
I think he will still hit for a decent enough average 290sh-300sh but Id be surprised to see him hit over 25 home runs again. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 452
|
I liked Cano as a Yankee, but with the exception of last year you could never hit him number 3. He would struggle in that spot so the Yankees always seemed to have to move him around to different spots.
I think the only time I agreed with Curt Schilling was when he said that Cano is a complimentary player. He is the Kind of player you would want to pair with Cabera, Trout, and others in this class. I also don't think he handled the pressure as well as other players have. I think if healthy Beltran well replicate Cano's numbers in Yankee stadium. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Major Leagues
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 379
Infractions: 0/1 (1)
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lufkin, TX
Posts: 2,213
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
|
Quote:
Yankees overpaid to keep a lot of their good players, and they surely overpaid vastly to keep Jeter and Rodriguez. Cano has to believe that the Yankees didn't show him respect if he compared the treatment. And if you look at some other players Yankees signed this off season, obviously Yankees overpaid with big and long deals also. Cano's words are definitely justified emotionally. Why Jeter, Rodriguez, Ellsbury, but not him? Yes fans might not want any of those, but for those fans, shouldn't the anger be more toward Jeter and Rodriguez than toward Cano?
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|