Ratings Scale - 2-8 vs 1-100 - Page 2

Rizon · 10-04-2013, 06:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by snepp

Another reason why I prefer the small scales is that it makes viewing things in the game much nicer. When you're creating a custom view that has a dozen or more ratings on it, it sure is nice to only be looking at single digits. Double digits can get very busy, and very cluttered in a hurry.

Yup, and also when exporting to an Excel file it makes it easier to read for me.

Mister_G · 10-05-2013, 02:17 AM

I use 1-10. I think it doesn't make it too easy and it's simple to understand. I tried 20-80 for a little to try to make it more realistic since that's what scouts use, but I was so used to 1-10 that it was just too confusing for me to adjust.

ashantewarrier · 10-05-2013, 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fyrestorm3

I wouldn't say higher accuracy, because scouts factor in, but yes, 1-100 gives you a much finer view of a player's abilities.

But that's why I use 2-8 (if I use ratings at all). I want fog of war.

Same here. I don't want to play with scouts off so the next best thing for me is to use the 2-8 scout rating.

SirMichaelJordan · 10-05-2013, 01:13 PM

2-8 for me. I'd go 1-5 if I didn't want to replicate how scouts rate players.

So yea, 2-8 is basically the best of both worlds of using 1-5 and 20-80.

10-05-2013, 02:17 AM	#22
Mister_G All Star Reserve Join Date: Jan 2012 Posts: 576	I use 1-10. I think it doesn't make it too easy and it's simple to understand. I tried 20-80 for a little to try to make it more realistic since that's what scouts use, but I was so used to 1-10 that it was just too confusing for me to adjust. __________________ A man doesn't make mistakes, mistakes make the man @MisterG90

10-05-2013, 01:13 PM	#24
SirMichaelJordan Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 2,716	Ratings Scale - 2-8 vs 1-100 2-8 for me. I'd go 1-5 if I didn't want to replicate how scouts rate players. So yea, 2-8 is basically the best of both worlds of using 1-5 and 20-80.