Ranking Issues

KurtBevacqua · 09-24-2013, 10:37 AM

Just bought 2013 yesterday. I set up a 70's Middleweight/Welterweight verse and had all the serious contenders load up on the tomato cans to get good records and now I have a problem. I'm at about 15 fights (give or take a couple), set the rankings to show after ten bouts, have several excellent undefeated fighters like Hagler, Leonard and Arguello. The only people getting ranked? Tomato cans with records like 1-14-2. Does the game look at strength of schedule that much? How do I get my studs ranked?

JOHNNYGUAPO · 09-24-2013, 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtBevacqua

Just bought 2013 yesterday. I set up a 70's Middleweight/Welterweight verse and had all the serious contenders load up on the tomato cans to get good records and now I have a problem. I'm at about 15 fights (give or take a couple), set the rankings to show after ten bouts, have several excellent undefeated fighters like Hagler, Leonard and Arguello. The only people getting ranked? Tomato cans with records like 1-14-2. Does the game look at strength of schedule that much? How do I get my studs ranked?

I can't get anyone ranked except whoever is holding the title.

Lee · 09-24-2013, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KurtBevacqua

Just bought 2013 yesterday. I set up a 70's Middleweight/Welterweight verse and had all the serious contenders load up on the tomato cans to get good records and now I have a problem. I'm at about 15 fights (give or take a couple), set the rankings to show after ten bouts, have several excellent undefeated fighters like Hagler, Leonard and Arguello. The only people getting ranked? Tomato cans with records like 1-14-2. Does the game look at strength of schedule that much? How do I get my studs ranked?

It may be you did not set all fighters to active and the rankings are only ranking the active fighters (check box in the options). You can mass edit and set this option up.

Here is what it would look like.

KurtBevacqua · 09-24-2013, 02:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee

It may be you did not set all fighters to active and the rankings are only ranking the active fighters (check box in the options). You can mass edit and set this option up.

Here is what it would look like.

It worked. Thanks!

JOHNNYGUAPO · 09-25-2013, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lee

It may be you did not set all fighters to active and the rankings are only ranking the active fighters (check box in the options). You can mass edit and set this option up.

Here is what it would look like.

I'm still only getting the champion ranked. I wonder what I'm doing wrong.

Lee · 09-25-2013, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JOHNNYGUAPO

I'm still only getting the champion ranked. I wonder what I'm doing wrong.

Can you post a screen shot of your set up and the ranking screen?

09-24-2013, 10:37 AM	#1
KurtBevacqua Hall Of Famer Join Date: May 2003 Posts: 2,968	Ranking Issues Just bought 2013 yesterday. I set up a 70's Middleweight/Welterweight verse and had all the serious contenders load up on the tomato cans to get good records and now I have a problem. I'm at about 15 fights (give or take a couple), set the rankings to show after ten bouts, have several excellent undefeated fighters like Hagler, Leonard and Arguello. The only people getting ranked? Tomato cans with records like 1-14-2. Does the game look at strength of schedule that much? How do I get my studs ranked? __________________ "The type and formula of most schemes of philanthropy or humanitarianism is this: A and B put their heads together to decide what C shall be made to do for D. The radical vice of all these schemes, from a sociological point of view, is that C is not allowed a voice in the matter, and his position, character, and interests, as well as the ultimate effects on society through C's interests, are entirely overlooked. I call C the Forgotten Man" - William Graham Sumner