Please allow us to edit future budgets

[mad0die]

The original discussion on this continues to veer wildly off tangent and I don't want our simple request muddled in epeen.

We don't want or need any drastic changes to the budgetary system and we are not asking to be able to 'turn off' budgets.

All we are asking is that you enable commish edit on the projected budget field on the team front office page.

You allow us to edit current budgets, but without also allowing us to edit projected budgets the two get out of sync and cause a lot of financial headaches for online leagues.

Thank you.

[The Wolf]

One thread is not enough?

[OutS|der]

Originally Posted by The Wolf

One thread is not enough?

No we need at least 3 of every one

[mad0die]

I'm hoping the knuckleballer doesn't notice this one and start dragging it down into a pointless argument.

[OutS|der]

Originally Posted by mad0die

I'm hoping the knuckleballer doesn't notice this one and start dragging it down into a pointless argument.

But this post is very helpful to the thread.
Oh wait it's not helpful at all my bad i must of got confused

[mad0die]

You do realize you douched this thread up first, right?

[OutS|der]

i did?
Please explain how i managed to do that with a sarcastic comment?

your right making a joke is just wrong

[The Wolf]

You could easily argue that a redundant duplicate thread was "douched up" from the start.

[endgame]

This was done at the time. I don't know how I can help any more than that:

Originally Posted by endgame

Just submitted this as a feature/bug report. Control, especially in the online league setting, certainly seems appropriate looking into future budgets.

I don't 'think' the online area and online central will be tackled in the very near future, but likely after Markus' retreat. Regardless, at least it's there waiting for him at that time.

[mad0die]

Thanks, Endgame.

[Charlie Hough]

Oops! I noticed it. But the best part of this new thread is the ironic outcome in light of this statement ...

The original discussion on this continues to veer wildly off tangent and I don't want our simple request muddled in epeen.

Free speech is a bitch, isn't it? Or should we put a stop to it because some people's views on an issue might be inconvenient for you, or maybe some others might playfully make light of the conflict?

Your request was submitted long ago, and if people had paid any attention, they would know that fact. It was in the first posts in the original thread. If people had bothered to read Endgame's post, this thread would have never been created.

But lest we devolve into another discussion that you deem to be 'useless', we can simply acknowledge that the request is already in, there is no need for further work toward that, and it is now up to Markus to decide what happens.

Case closed. But if anyone would like to continue the discussion further, go right ahead. You will never see me getting in the way of people's right to speak freely and share their viewpoints. So let me step aside, and keep the party going!

[Nunyer]

Originally Posted by Charlie Hough

Regardless of all the butt hurt flying around these threads.... I just want to say that these two animated gifs are the bomb!

[mad0die]

These boards and this game would suck without YOU, Charlie! THANK YOU FOR YOUR VIGILANCE!!

[Cliche]

Originally Posted by endgame

This was done at the time. I don't know how I can help any more than that:

Thanks man, much appreciated.

[PlinyTheElder]

Originally Posted by endgame

This was done at the time. I don't know how I can help any more than that:

Much appreciated!

[TGH-Adfabre]

Originally Posted by endgame

This was done at the time. I don't know how I can help any more than that:

Thanks

[Cooleyvol]

Originally Posted by Charlie Hough

Oops! I noticed it. But the best part of this new thread is the ironic outcome in light of this statement ...



Free speech is a bitch, isn't it? Or should we put a stop to it because some people's views on an issue might be inconvenient for you, or maybe some others might playfully make light of the conflict?

Your request was submitted long ago, and if people had paid any attention, they would know that fact. It was in the first posts in the original thread. If people had bothered to read Endgame's post, this thread would have never been created.

But lest we devolve into another discussion that you deem to be 'useless', we can simply acknowledge that the request is already in, there is no need for further work toward that, and it is now up to Markus to decide what happens.

Case closed. But if anyone would like to continue the discussion further, go right ahead. You will never see me getting in the way of people's right to speak freely and share their viewpoints. So let me step aside, and keep the party going!

Exactly what purpose did this post serve?

To tell us we can continue to discuss this and that you will be stepping aside. Time will tell, won't it?

[The Wolf]

Originally Posted by Cooleyvol

Exactly what purpose did this post serve?

To tell us we can continue to discuss this and that you will be stepping aside. Time will tell, won't it?

It served far more purpose than the first post in this thread did.

[The Wolf]

A very bothersome recent trend on this board is that some people who are starting threads want to control or suppress contrary opinion. I agree with Charlie Hough on very, very little, but his point about being free to disagree is critical.

[CONN CHRIS]

Originally Posted by Charlie Hough

.

Originally Posted by The Wolf

.

Originally Posted by mad0die

.

Originally Posted by OutS|der

.

A word to the wise, keep your discourse civil.