|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 323
|
Potential Historical League
I'm thinking of starting a historical league, starting in 1985, or 1990. 7 day sims, 5 days a week. (7 day because you can set 7-day lineups in the game)
having recalcs, retirements are all real-life stuff turned OFF, so historical players will play it out all over, with superstars may not turn into superstars and bench players could be MVP's! this is just to gauge interest. If i get enough, i will go through and create the website and get the league going. Thank you for your time! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 323
|
i have the webspace, and about 6 hours a day to devote to the league while at work but due to the lack of interest (2 teams) this is a dead idea. admins can delete this topic, thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Ft Smith Ark. USA
Posts: 2,681
|
Quote:
There are so many unknown variables, when discussing an imaginary league, you can't expect people to commit to it. A prospective owner must have something concrete to look at and consider, before he can decide whether he likes a league enough to join it. The amount of interest and involvement that owners will show for an actual, constructed league is infinitely more than they will show for a proposal. You can't join a proposal. You can't be a member of a proposal. You can't be loyal to a proposal. You can't love a proposal. If you have imagination, webspace, and free time, build your league and start rocking. You'll get the owners. Consider this fact: take a premium new league, fully fleshed-out and online--announce its launch on this forum, and you're going to pick up about one new owner a day. It takes the most interesting, well-done leagues at least a couple of weeks to fill up. You can't expect a bunch of people to flock around a proposed league, and get all excited about it. Not going to happen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Out in Leftfield
Posts: 618
|
And there it is
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Wentzville, MO
Posts: 85
|
I've already told you I'm very interested in helping you get this league started and I know of one other person that I could get to join for sure. I completely agree with the above posts that basically say, if you build it well, the GM's will come. If you want to do it and you have 6 hours a day to do it, you need to go ahead and do it!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 323
|
Quote:
A project starts with an idea, due to the below-average interest, it will die as an idea. I appreciate you all helping with everything, but its best to not start, then to have a less-than-full league with part-time members. Much Respect. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 272
|
My plate is too full to join your league, pucku. BUT I'd like to say to anyone on the bubble of "showing interest..." Pucku is in the league I run (BCBL) and he's been very active since he joined and I, personally, would have no reservations about joining his league.
My historical itch was just recently scratched but the CBLRewind, which filled up very quickly, partly because the admins are proven to run a great league... but I also think there is a shortage of historical online leagues compared to the amount of fictional and RL Player leagues. I enjoy all three, but I believe historical leagues are in demand ATM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 97
|
I agree with the above. There are too few historical leagues and this would be sure to fill up once/if it got started. Appears to be dead now but I wish there was another historical league circa 1980-1990 available.
__________________
------------------------------------------- USBL United States Baseball League WBL World Baseball League Last edited by wallball; 10-08-2009 at 11:11 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|