All generated rookies 16 years old

RoadMovie7 · 12-08-2008, 08:12 PM

I generated them in 9.2.7 and had the minimum age set to 16 and max age set to 32....however it generated them all as 16 years old. I am currently on 9.2.10.

Any thoughts?

Tony M · 12-09-2008, 08:55 AM

This, as nutlaw will back me up on, is something we argued during beta.

We said that created players should be throughout the range, but Markus said that because they all need to develop together they should start at the same age.

Nutlaw · 12-09-2008, 11:43 AM

*grumble*

I think that we're stuck with this one as is right now.

cbbl · 12-10-2008, 10:35 AM

A clarification ...

Is this only because the ages were specified (IOW, if the ages were blank, would the game still only create 16 year olds?)

Also -- is this specific to the latest patch?

Thanks!

Tony M · 12-10-2008, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cbbl

A clarification ...

Is this only because the ages were specified (IOW, if the ages were blank, would the game still only create 16 year olds?)

Also -- is this specific to the latest patch?

Thanks!

If there's no age range specified, a wide range of ages is created.

This has been like this throughout v9

Nutlaw · 12-19-2008, 02:50 PM

As there isn't much more to say here, unfortunately, I'll close this one out.

12-08-2008, 08:12 PM	#1
RoadMovie7 Minors (Single A) Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 64	All generated rookies 16 years old I generated them in 9.2.7 and had the minimum age set to 16 and max age set to 32....however it generated them all as 16 years old. I am currently on 9.2.10. Any thoughts?

12-09-2008, 08:55 AM	#2
Tony M Global Moderator Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Here Posts: 6,156	This, as nutlaw will back me up on, is something we argued during beta. We said that created players should be throughout the range, but Markus said that because they all need to develop together they should start at the same age.

12-09-2008, 11:43 AM	#3
Nutlaw Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 9,538	grumble I think that we're stuck with this one as is right now.

12-10-2008, 10:35 AM	#4
cbbl All Star Starter Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 1,179	A clarification ... Is this only because the ages were specified (IOW, if the ages were blank, would the game still only create 16 year olds?) Also -- is this specific to the latest patch? Thanks!

12-19-2008, 02:50 PM	#6
Nutlaw Hall Of Famer Join Date: Apr 2003 Posts: 9,538	As there isn't much more to say here, unfortunately, I'll close this one out.