|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 421
|
Groundball %, ratings question
So I was messing around with a few players from one of cubby's sets. I thought that groundball % was basically cosmetic, but when i raised it, the expected batting average against went up, and when lowered the average went down. Does this seem backwards?
It has been a while since I looked into it, but I thought the general statistical evidence supported that groundball pitchers tend to have lower BA against, BABIP. It would be nice if this stat was also tied to homeruns against, as I am pretty sure that groundball pitchers do have a greater success at keeping the ball in the yard. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 822
|
Groundballs are more likely to go for basehits than balls hit in the air, so that would make the expected batting average go up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 421
|
Quote:
Balls hit in the air are more likely to go for homeruns (and last I checked the league average was about 10% flyballs go for homeruns) which also increase average, not to mention doubles, and basehits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 421
|
Yeah, okay. I think I had it backwards. It seems to be about a .12 difference in batting average, according to a Baseball Prospectus article. That's all the legwork i am doing.
When the average is calculated though they remove homruns from the equation? That seems odd. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 5,725
|
Home runs are never in play (except, of course, in extremely rare Jose Canseco type instances).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the dynasty forum
Posts: 2,318
|
Quote:
__________________
Heaven is kicking back with a double Talisker and a churchwarden stuffed with latakia. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|