opinion on the future of OOTP

[canadiancreed]

Originally Posted by cephasjames

Fantastic to some in the US. A failure to everyone else in the world.

Fixed (and I think we need a better analogy, that doesn't make OOTP2006 look good at all! )

[Raidergoo]

Originally Posted by canadiancreed

Fixed (and I think we need a better analogy, that doesn't make OOTP2006 look good at all! )

That sort of politics has no point here.

[canadiancreed]

Originally Posted by Raidergoo

That sort of politics has no point here.

There's a reason why it has smileys.

[Raidergoo]

Originally Posted by canadiancreed

There's a reason why it has smileys.

Smileys, no smileys, it's OT.

Sorry if I sound rude.

[cephasjames]

Originally Posted by Raidergoo

That sort of politics has no point here.

That was my bad. CC was just playing off of what I said, us being OT sparing partners and all.

[Cooleyvol]

Originally Posted by Treches

- Online leagues: It might be of some interest to state that OOTP is still around, 7 years after the first version, thanks in no small part to the existance of those leagues, who spread the word when only a few knew about this game (which is sold online, for that matter). Should be wise to really have that in mind when creating a new version of OOTP. At least once.

Like it or not, this could be the most profound statement in this thread.

[canadiancreed]

Originally Posted by cephasjames

That was my bad. CC was just playing off of what I said, us being OT sparing partners and all.

we spar?

Anyways back on topic...

Like it or not, this could be the most profound statement in this thread.

Indeed.

[mikev]

:tantrum:

I brought up online leagues first, and all I get is Curtis and his condescending attitude BS.

Treches brings it up, and Cooley and CC go nuts about how right he is.

Damn East Coast bias. hrmph.

[bibs]

Originally Posted by Treches

- Online leagues: It might be of some interest to state that OOTP is still around, 7 years after the first version, thanks in no small part to the existance of those leagues, who spread the word when only a few knew about this game (which is sold online, for that matter). Should be wise to really have that in mind when creating a new version of OOTP. At least once.

Based on the low priority given online functionality, this is obviously not a sentiment shared by SI or Markus

[bibs]

Originally Posted by Raidergoo

That sort of politics has no point here.

Intersting phrasing, what sort of politics does have a point here? I'm sure you only objected because he didn't agree with your politics.

[Curtis]

Originally Posted by mikev

I brought up online leagues first, and all I get is Curtis and his condescending attitude BS.

My condescending attitude is a carryover from the 'Never Ending Spring Training' thread in the Technical Support forum. I remembered you contributing to that, but I didn't remember that you were one of the more polite contributors. I would apologize, but I can't think of a sufficiently condescending way in which to do so.

When I made the post last night that got you all het up, I was high on life and enjoying myself more than a body has a right to. Obviously you were in the opposite situation. I'm sorry I offended you, but since it was explained to you (and some others) in that other thread that online gamers are in no worse shape under 2006 than they were in 6.51, it seemed like unneccessary carping that you would then immediately bring up the same thing again here before the first thread grew cold. So, I poked some fun at it, rather than get bent out of shape. You should try it, if you manage to locate your sense of humor.

There, I think that did it.

[Curtis]

Originally Posted by bibs

Intersting phrasing, what sort of politics does have a point here? I'm sure you only objected because he didn't agree with your politics.

This is a baseball section of the forum. There is also a political section for those who are interested.

[cephasjames]

Originally Posted by bibs

Intersting phrasing, what sort of politics does have a point here? I'm sure you only objected because he didn't agree with your politics.

I think it had to do more with the fact that this not OT.

[Raidergoo]

Originally Posted by bibs

Intersting phrasing, what sort of politics does have a point here? I'm sure you only objected because he didn't agree with your politics.

No politics in General Discussions.

. . .and if you'd care to check mine, I would not vote for Bush.

[mikev]

Originally Posted by Curtis

My condescending attitude is a carryover from the 'Never Ending Spring Training' thread in the Technical Support forum. I remembered you contributing to that, but I didn't remember that you were one of the more polite contributors. I would apologize, but I can't think of a sufficiently condescending way in which to do so.

Well, at least you're doing your best. I'm sorry you can't seperate a current Tech Support thread from a thread discussing the future of the game.

When I made the post last night that got you all het up, I was high on life and enjoying myself more than a body has a right to. Obviously you were in the opposite situation. I'm sorry I offended you, but since it was explained to you (and some others) in that other thread that online gamers are in no worse shape under 2006 than they were in 6.51, it seemed like unneccessary carping that you would then immediately bring up the same thing again here before the first thread grew cold.

Ah, but they *are* in worse shape, You wouldn't know that, though, as you have professed your love for solo play and your entire OOTP career will go without online leagues.

So, I poked some fun at it, rather than get bent out of shape. You should try it, if you manage to locate your sense of humor.

Please believe me when I say you will have to do much, much better than that to get me bent out of shape. I suppose I could have added [sarcasm] tags to my previous post, but I figured that people would get the point without. Guess not.

There, I think that did it.

Good job!

[Treches]

Originally Posted by mikev

:tantrum:

I brought up online leagues first, and all I get is Curtis and his condescending attitude BS.

Treches brings it up, and Cooley and CC go nuts about how right he is.

Damn East Coast bias. hrmph.

As a matter of fact, I brough it up due to Curtis' remarks on the subject.

Originally Posted by bibs

Based on the low priority given online functionality, this is obviously not a sentiment shared by SI or Markus

So it seems; so has always seemed to me.

Originally Posted by Curtis

I'm sorry I offended you, but since it was explained to you (and some others) in that other thread that online gamers are in no worse shape under 2006 than they were in 6.51

I don't know who explained that (not you, I suppose, since you said you're are yet to play this game online), but I disagree with that statement.

[silvam14]

[canadiancreed]

Originally Posted by mikev

:tantrum:

I brought up online leagues first, and all I get is Curtis and his condescending attitude BS.

Treches brings it up, and Cooley and CC go nuts about how right he is.

Damn East Coast bias. hrmph.

Well technically I'm not east coast, but sorry for missing your statement. (Darn A's fans )

[mikev]

Originally Posted by canadiancreed

(Darn A's fans )

Oh, it's on now. Meet me at the bike racks after school!

[mikev]

doublepost.