Great Player Effect2

[megamanmatt]

The thing of it is you need proof. During the development for ootp2006 many people wanted a rating for catchers that would effectivly be their "ability to call a game". It's a good idea, a **** good idea. But Markus had no way to represent it becasue there was no physical evidence that the catcher really had any effect on the game. There is no physical proof a good player has any effect on attendance.

[megamanmatt]

That's my point. I'd support it if you could prove it. Cause anything that would add to realism is a good idea.

[BigMember]

Originally Posted by megamanmatt

1933 the Yankees have ruth and Gehrig but still manage to have and attendance record 200,000 people less than 1932

Jeeze. And what team did Ruth and Gehrig play for the year before that, or the year before that and so on and so on? Man, you are really reaching for straws trying to argue a point you already conceded twice. I mean your example here doesn't even apply to anything in this thread at all.

Man, my Grandfather told me once not to argue with a certain kind of person. You might be one of those he was talking about. I'm off to bed, so have at it. Throw logic to the wind and reach even deeper. You're really just proving both of my points each time you reply here. Good luck.