|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#81 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,332
|
Quote:
just because you know ahead of time that Clemens is going to throw his splitter in the dirt on 83% of his 0-2 counts, doesnt mean you arent going to swing anyways
__________________
2 Wild Cards, 11 Division Champs, 4 League Champs, 3 World Champs, and 3 Best GM awards Baseball Maelstrom - New York Mets - 180-149 .547 Corporate League Baseball - Coke Buzz - 889-649 .578 Western Hemisphere Baseball League - Santiago Saints - 672-793 .459 Record - 2428-2271 .517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,023
Infractions: 1/1 (1)
|
What about former teammates? I've always been under the impression that when facing former teammates, there is a heightened sense of scouting going on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 732
|
14.2.1.3 says 20-80 rating scale will be used. I understand this is what is used in RL but can this be changed to some other range? If your other ratings in the game are on a different scale (say 0-100) you'd likely tell your scouts to use the same 0-100 scale.
This second also says, "...on a scale of 20-80, compared to the other players in the currently selected league." Is the "currently selected league" the one in which the scouts work, right? |
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 323
|
14.2.1.4 is absolutely wonderful. I love that the new version will be taking philosophies into account. In our days of Billy Beane versus Joe Morgan, it's going to add a whole new dimension to gameplay, having guys making decisions and recommendations based on their own personal biases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,907
Infractions: 0/2 (4)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,506
|
Quote:
![]() The comparison is to other players in the league that the player you are currently viewing belongs to. Scouts don't necessarily work in a certain league. They can scout any player in the game world. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,506
|
Quote:
Last edited by battists; 04-19-2007 at 04:02 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,506
|
Just found out that I was mistaken:
When you start a league, your head scout automatically quick-scouts all players. So, when you enter the inaugural draft, you will have decent scouting data on all players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#89 | |
|
All Star Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Las Vegas, Nev
Posts: 1,965
|
Quote:
__________________
Elder Statesman of the Boardhttp://www.soxxcountry.com/ site with FaceGen Central and Duffys Tavern Live OOTP Chat Room |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,023
Infractions: 1/1 (1)
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 323
|
Having read through the sample manual and given it more thought, I have to agree that it's absurd conceptually that you should lose scouting reports when you fire a guy. I understand the logistics problem, but can't they at least be archived somewhere?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#92 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,031
|
as long as you can print that **** out, i'm good, looking forward!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Major Leagues
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 326
|
Any update about the mac release date?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#94 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,506
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#95 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6,023
Infractions: 1/1 (1)
|
Quote:
I recommend "through"... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#96 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: The Real Northern California
Posts: 2,488
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#97 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 16,842
|
Quote:
What I'm trying to say, without diminishing the initial import of scouting results, is that they are not indispensible; the large majority of them (exc. as noted in the example above) variable and likely more important on the short term basis - the length of his employment - that any grand scaled plan for league-wide quantification. These are guys who do the job, do it the best they can under your supervision and some a little better in one area than another. What he 'wrote down for remembering' will, again in my opinion only, more likely be in the form of a future performance forecast (News item or email) or a personal note you've taken about a player on your Shortlist you plan to include in your own future development. It's a wide world of potential development, the world of scouting. I think it is an outstanding evolution in the game for a variety of reasons. But I will step out on a relatively sturdy limb and claim that its world of possibilities rely much more on their creative use, future expansion (ala The Advance Scout), and your own involvement in their assignments than it will, at all, on any given individual set of numbers recorded with one individual player.
__________________
"Try again. Fail again. Fail better." -- Samuel Beckett _____________________________________________ Last edited by endgame; 05-17-2006 at 11:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#99 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 706
|
Sorry if this has already been covered, but is it possible for former players to come back as coaches or scouts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#100 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,506
|
Quote:
Not only that, scouts have their own preferences as well. So, when you hire scouts, it makes sense to look for scouts whose preferences are similar to your own. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|