|
||||
| ||||
|
|||||||
| Earlier versions of OOTP: Suggestions and Feature Wish List Let us know what you would like to see in future versions of OOTP! OOTPBM 2006 is in development, and there is still time left to get your suggestions into the game. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 505
|
Non-roster invitees
After just going through an offseason, I noticed something that I believe to be missing from the process. There were several older players who had had limited playing time in their career and were free agents at the end of the year. I have some openings in OF and the bullpen and thought to give some of these guys a chance. However I don't want to sign them to a minor league contract and fill up my 40 man roster.
I think it would be a good idea to have Spring Training non-roster invites for players. Then I can at least monitor their progress through spring training and decide if I want to cut them from my team or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 5,725
|
Quote:
I strongly agree that if there is going to be a true Spring Training schedule in the new version that this needs to be included. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 505
|
andymac
Maybe we as St. Louis Cardinals fans (which I believe you are from a previous post I've seen) see this more of a needed option than some others (for example: Abraham Nunez and Bill Pulsipher last year for the Cardinals). It always seems like Walt finds a gem out there to invite for spring training doesn't it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 5,725
|
Quote:
Walt does use the NRI's quite a bit and tends to end up keeping at least one or two of them. I think that is the case for most teams, though. Especially the teams that are in the 2nd & 3rd tier as far as payrolls. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,251
|
Exactly how Spring training is handled wouldn't be a bad idea for a blog
__________________
GM's RULE!!!!! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 159
|
It's going to have Spring Training games! I guess it will have all the bell and wistle in it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Minors (Double A)
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 159
|
However I don't want to sign them to a minor league contract and fill up my 40 man roster but they won't be on your 40 man roster if you sign them to a Minor League contract and invite them to camp. Sometimes teams will bring recent Draft Picks and journeman or how ever you spell it to camp as Non Roster Players and Pitchers!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 586
|
I never liked the way Spring Training was handled in past versions. I would also like to see a spring training schedule with some stats that could atleast help in decieding if I want to keep that aging vet on the roster or go with the hot prospect. ofcourse a bad spring training wouldnt mean a player is washed up nor would a good one guarentee that the player was good but it would be nice to have something tangiable to look at when trying to pick your 5th starter and fill out the back ends of your bench and bullpen.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 921
|
I agree that NRI are important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
|
For NRI to make sense in game, it must be coupled with fuzzy scouting systems. Unless you are playing with the ratings off, it's a pointless waste of time.
Also it doesn't make sense to monitor players through spring training stats. I don't think real life teams are doing that. Have some kind of detailed scouting report for those in the spring training camp should be much more meaningful than the spring training stats.
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Effingham, IL
Posts: 5,725
|
Quote:
Right...bringing a guy in as a NRI should be, essentially, a way to get a better scouting report on him. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
All Star Reserve
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 921
|
I think just the value of seeing him play everday is worth something.
I do this all the time with LOOGYs in my own ST that I crudely constructed. I'll pick up four or five guys with similar ratings vs LHB and then I'll let them audition for the spot. Maybe one guy has 7s across the board, while another guy is 9/3/9, another guy is 8/5/8, and another guy is 10/6/6. They're all decent, but who's the best? I could probably look at the numbers and decide, but I've already used the numbers to narrow it down, so why not let ST games decide? I really think that ST is a great new feature, and a big part of it is NRI. And don't forget, if ST is a real part of the game, that means that you might wind up with some injuries. And so you might find yourself bringing on an NRI just because you need a body. And maybe that guy is fresh because he worked out with your team while FAs have been sitting on their asses and are rusty. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Where you live
Posts: 11,017
|
Quote:
I would believe stuff like "he's swinging really well" would mean much more than a .350 batting average in real life spring trainings too.
__________________
Jonathan Haidt: Moral reasoning is really just a servant masquerading as a high priest. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|