|
||||
| ||||
|
|
#1 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,417
|
Puresim Baseball 2004 wow look at the improvements fixes
http://dynamic2.gamespy.com/%7Efof/f...ad.php?t=31247
It adds 60 new features and tweaks to PureSim along with tons of fixes (70+). Last edited by jbmagic; 10-06-2004 at 05:07 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,417
|
i dont think so,,,
but if it did wow |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 209
|
Can anyone who has this game comment on it from the perspective of the solo simmer who loves almanacs and record books and the like. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Sioux Falls, SD
Posts: 5,021
|
its a pretty decent game. I think it really compares with OOTP6.. Works better in the fictional world however...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 11,800
|
Quote:
I've read great things about its support. Quote:
Give the 7 day trial a go, you might really like it. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Global Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 11,800
|
Quote:
I think of online leagues or multiplayer as a feature, not as support. No, I don't believe it does yet. I did read that Shaun was considering it though, perhaps as an add-on.http://p089.ezboard.com/fpuresimbase...icID=296.topic
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Minors (Rookie Ball)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 40
|
Puresim
I downloaded the demo when Puresim was released, but it ran extremely slow on my computer, compared to OOTP6. I liked the gameplay fine and might give it another try when I get a newer computer ... some day.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,372
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that it does NOT support career, year to year play.
Also, it is a recreation of a season, and does not have a player draft. These are both show-stoppers in my book, no matter how accurate the sim. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Easy mistake. I ment to have a league in between Online and Support, so my fault really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Minors (Triple A)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 209
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Field of Dreams
Posts: 1,998
|
PureSim can now import custom schedule files designed for OOTP6 (available via the options dialog).
ahah |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,251
|
First my Campaign, then adopting OOTP schedules ... hmm. Anyone ever been to the state of Denmark, recently?
__________________
GM's RULE!!!!! Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The OC
Posts: 6,358
|
Can anyone tell me which of these is better for historical leagues? I generally like replaying all of baseball history, and I'm pretty committed to OOTP for the present. However, if I'm not happy with the SI version of OOTP and its historical support I may consider switching if PureSim is good with historicals.
__________________
Looking for an insomnia cure? Check out my dynasty thread, The Dawn of American Professional Base Ball, 1871. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Minors (Single A)
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 48
|
Well...
To be fair, I am going to change the name to "DanSim Baseball"
- Shaun |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: College Park, Md.
Posts: 5,024
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,251
|
Quote:
![]() PS - for the wit, you just got $35
__________________
GM's RULE!!!!! Quote:
Last edited by Dan Theman; 10-06-2004 at 10:15 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 | |
|
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,946
|
Wrong....
Quote:
Actually Puresim is a career game, in some ways it is better than OOTP5 but I made the switch to OOTP6 and am more comfortable with it. I have not tried Puresim since the 2003 game. I like the fact that Puresim fixes bugs quicker andthat the creator puts out many patches throughout the year and some of the patches add features as well... Overall both OOTP and Puresim are good games. If you are happy with OOTP you will enjoy Puresim also...but puresim does not have as many 3rd party utilities as OOTP and that is why I mainly play OOTP (mainly because of CATOBASE) |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|