Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 26 Available - FHM 11 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 26 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Baseball 25 > OOTP 25 - General Discussions

OOTP 25 - General Discussions Everything about the brand new 25th Anniversary Edition of Out of the Park Baseball - officially licensed by MLB, the MLBPA, KBO and the Baseball Hall of Fame.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-31-2025, 07:08 PM   #1
kq76
Global Moderator
 
kq76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 11,649
Any idea on how OOTP decides when to move a team?

Or better yet, if you were to create some sort of algorithm that would determine when a team in OOTP would move, or should at least consider it, what factors would you base it on?

I'm thinking it could be as simple as near the bottom of the league revenue year after year. I don't think any team that does well financially should move. I understand, maybe you could do even better elsewhere, but that's not guaranteed. I realize that teams that move usually cite stadium issues, but the reason beneath that is surely revenue. I suppose you could just focus on in-stadium revenue, but if the vast majority of your revenue is in-stadium then you might as well just go with total revenue.

I first thought about factoring in market size, fan loyalty, and all that, but I don't think any of those really matter all that much. For example, we've seen IRL teams leave the biggest markets and we've seen teams with seemingly great fan loyalty leave, all for better stadium deals elsewhere. And I don't think win-loss record matters much either as moving isn't going to help that on its own. To win you need a well run organization, not a good location. A good location can leverage the benefits from your success, but it won't make you successful itself.

So if we based it solely on revenue, what % should be the threshold, how many consecutive years should it take before it's a possibility, and what should the % chances be each year once you the team does hit the threshold for those consecutive years? I'm thinking bottom 20% in revenue, starting at 3 years straight, a team should have a 20% chance of moving, and every year after that add another 20% until you reach a max of 80%. For example, after 3 straight years of bottom 20% revenue a team would have a 20% chance of moving, after 4 years they'd have a 40% chance, and so on to a max of an 80% chance of moving.

I made a simple spreadsheet that will decide whether a team should be relocated based on the above. If you want to use it, copy it, and then use it or change it however you like. You'll have to identify what teams this should be run for, but if you like the idea, just enter your data into the green cells, press the box, and it'll do the calculations for you. B7 only uses the green cells, B1 is there simply as a reminder.

I recently saw OOTP move a team after only 2 years of the worst revenue and while that was interesting, it surprised me a bit that a team would move that fast. Of course, that wouldn't have been that surprising of an occurrence back in the early days of baseball, but I think it'd be difficult to imagine that happening that fast nowadays. Although, I suppose we could still have a situation similar to what happened to the Seattle Pilots even nowadays. Maybe we should "roll the dice" after only one year of the worst revenue.

Last edited by kq76; 01-31-2025 at 07:12 PM.
kq76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 02:55 AM   #2
textilemonster
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 129
From my understanding, the Seattle Pilots was a very unusual situation (like having to start two seasons early due to a threat to MLB's antitrust exemption); but yes, having some logic behind team relocation is a good idea.

Maybe have an uptick in chances of moving if the team is sold/changes owners? No idea if that could even be factored in somehow, though.

Last edited by textilemonster; 02-02-2025 at 03:14 AM.
textilemonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 05:56 AM   #3
kq76
Global Moderator
 
kq76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 11,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by textilemonster View Post
From my understanding, the Seattle Pilots was a very unusual situation (like having to start two seasons early due to a threat to MLB's antitrust exemption); but yes, having some logic behind team relocation is a good idea.
I've learned a bit about the Pilots over the years and it was pretty crazy. It was a debacle long before they even played their first game. You're right, if they were given more time to get everything in order they would have at least had a better chance at making it work. I think they would have still probably failed as their financing was never solid, but being forced to start two years early put them in a terrible position. I can't see that happening ever again, but you never know.

If anyone is curious to know more about them, I highly recommend this doc on youtube. It's both interesting and entertaining. It features historians and a bunch of the players, including Jim Bouton, of Ball Four fame.

Quote:
Originally Posted by textilemonster View Post
Maybe have an uptick in chances of moving if the team is sold/changes owners? No idea if that could even be factored in somehow, though.
Oh, that's a good one! When relocations happen IRL they seem to often coincide with an ownership change.

It's too bad stadium finances aren't a bigger aspect of OOTP. Imagine opting for some renovations that you hope will increase ticket demand or requiring renovations to change your park dimensions/factors. Sure, you could easily go too deep with it, but those alone would give the user more opportunity to impact their success or failure.

But yeah, check out that Pilots doc. I just re-watched it before posting this and I'm glad I did.
kq76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2025, 01:00 PM   #4
textilemonster
Minors (Double A)
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 129
A whole mechanic around stadiums and teams moving would be awesome. Imagine we, as another team in the league, get news about a team wanting a new ballpark; having trouble getting a new ballpark; team owner visits another city; an owner vote has to take place for a team to relocate; etc.

Could do similar for expansion where we at least have notice and SOME say, rather than just "Hey, we added two teams, they're starting tomorrow."
textilemonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:26 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments