Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 27 Buy Now - FHM 12 Available - OOTP Go! 27 Available

Out of the Park Baseball 27 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Out of the Park Developments > Talk Sports

Talk Sports Discuss everything that is sports-related, like MLB, NFL, NHL, NBA, MLS, NASCAR, NCAA sports and teams, trades, coaches, bad calls etc.

View Poll Results: Is the DH a good idea?
Yes. Pitchers hitting is stupid. 31 44.29%
No. Play the field if you're gonna hit, you sissy. 39 55.71%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-03-2006, 11:05 AM   #1
mikev
Hall Of Famer
 
mikev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,014
The Designated Hitter debate

The DH is a good thing, and everybody who likes the idea of pitchers hitting is wrong.

Thank you.






(This post specifically created for JDOldSchool and ukhotstove)
__________________
Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and Oakland Oaks GM

Last edited by mikev; 10-03-2006 at 11:07 AM.
mikev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:14 AM   #2
Raidergoo
Hall Of Famer
 
Raidergoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,005
The DH is one of the Seven Signs of the Coming of the Apocalypse.

Rebuking it will stay God's wrath.
Raidergoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:25 AM   #3
JDOldSchool
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikev
The DH is a good thing, and everybody who likes the idea of pitchers hitting is wrong.
In Major League Baseball, yes. I'm not advocating a DH in little league or anything where the pitchers are usually the best players.

If pitchers could hit, and 99% can not, then they should. But since they can't all it does is make the NL game inferior. We don't make quarterbacks play safety. Why make pitchers hit? Because that's how baseball "is supposed to be"? Well, Major League Baseball wasn't supposed to have blacks playing, either.

And yes, I realize that's a tremendous stretch, but I could cite the myriad rule changes that were made in the late-1800s/early 1900s that nobody seems to wish came back. I'm not sure why pitchers hitting is special and those aren't.
JDOldSchool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:28 AM   #4
mikev
Hall Of Famer
 
mikev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 4,014
Quote:
Originally Posted by JDOldSchool
In Major League Baseball, yes. I'm not advocating a DH in little league or anything where the pitchers are usually the best players.

If pitchers could hit, and 99% can not, then they should. But since they can't all it does is make the NL game inferior. We don't make quarterbacks play safety. Why make pitchers hit? Because that's how baseball "is supposed to be"? Well, Major League Baseball wasn't supposed to have blacks playing, either.

And yes, I realize that's a tremendous stretch, but I could cite the myriad rule changes that were made in the late-1800s/early 1900s that nobody seems to wish came back. I'm not sure why pitchers hitting is special and those aren't.
I was only talking about MLB, and I agree with you. I think it's ridiculous to watch pitchers try to hit. Dontrelle Willis, who is a "good" hitting pitcher, has a career .591 OPS.
__________________
Global Unified Baseball Association - Vice Commish and Oakland Oaks GM
mikev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:36 AM   #5
ukhotstove
Hall Of Famer
 
ukhotstove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North of England Gods Country
Posts: 7,175
Having no DH makes the managers job an actual job that needs brains, with a DH the managers job is way easier. Also the biggest quote for a DH is that pitchers can't hit well doh! DH's can't field or else they wouldn't be DH's, also early days but looks like the no DH is winning
ukhotstove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:47 AM   #6
billethius
All Star Reserve
 
billethius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 822
As someone who got to enjoy watching Edgar Martinez hit long after his hamstrings were destroyed while playing 3rd base, I feel that I have to vote for the DH being a good thing.
billethius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:49 AM   #7
imation
Major Leagues
 
imation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukhotstove
Having no DH makes the managers job an actual job that needs brains, with a DH the managers job is way easier. Also the biggest quote for a DH is that pitchers can't hit well doh! DH's can't field or else they wouldn't be DH's, also early days but looks like the no DH is winning
Well then lets take away the bullpen phone, all advanced scouting techniques and anything else that has made the manager job easier.
__________________


imation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:53 AM   #8
billethius
All Star Reserve
 
billethius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 822
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukhotstove
Having no DH makes the managers job an actual job that needs brains, with a DH the managers job is way easier. Also the biggest quote for a DH is that pitchers can't hit well doh! DH's can't field or else they wouldn't be DH's, also early days but looks like the no DH is winning
That's not always true. Raul Ibanez was the DH here in Seattle last year because there were 3 guys in the OF who were better defensively than him. But he was back out in left this year, and while not a good defensive player he's not killing the team with his glove either.

Along the same lines, after the M's released Carl Everett this year they rotated the DH among several different players to give them a day off of playing the field. I'd imagine there are more teams out there that do something similar.
billethius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 11:55 AM   #9
Melo
All Star Starter
 
Melo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Where the baned reside
Posts: 1,428
The DH was instituted by the AL for one reason: The AL was inferior to the NL at the time and AL attendance was lagging behind NL attendance. The DH was a gimmick used to draw interest to the AL and put fannies in the seats.

I can't stand the DH but I am resigned to the fact that the NL will eventually adopt it.
Melo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:00 PM   #10
ukhotstove
Hall Of Famer
 
ukhotstove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North of England Gods Country
Posts: 7,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by imation
Well then lets take away the bullpen phone, all advanced scouting techniques and anything else that has made the manager job easier.
Dumb reply
ukhotstove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:01 PM   #11
kq76
Global Moderator
 
kq76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 12,006
This poll should have been public... so I could put on ignore all those who like the DH.
kq76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:01 PM   #12
Tom the Fish
All Star Reserve
 
Tom the Fish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Jingu Stadium
Posts: 510
"It robbed the game of its strategic possibilities in the late innings and turned every pitcher in the league into half a ballplayer. Once Finley got that abberation in place, he tried to sell baseball on the idea of the three-ball walk as another way to perk up scoring. I wondered why they just didn't get rid of pitchers altogether. They could have just put the ball up on a tee and let the batters swing away to their hearts' content... For years I've been called the rebel. Well, I'm not. It's guys like Finley who are the rebels. I'm a baseball traditionalist... I hated the DH and all the other new wrinkles that had been introduced in an attempt to corrupt the game..."

Bill Lee, The Wrong Stuff
__________________
"Any talk of rebelliousness has to begin with one's
profound appreciation and understanding of tradition."
- Lu Shoukun

Last edited by Tom the Fish; 10-03-2006 at 12:12 PM.
Tom the Fish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:03 PM   #13
imation
Major Leagues
 
imation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukhotstove
Dumb reply
Dumb response because your reason for not having the DH was even dumber.
__________________


imation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:03 PM   #14
ukhotstove
Hall Of Famer
 
ukhotstove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North of England Gods Country
Posts: 7,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by billethius
That's not always true. Raul Ibanez was the DH here in Seattle last year because there were 3 guys in the OF who were better defensively than him. But he was back out in left this year, and while not a good defensive player he's not killing the team with his glove either.

Along the same lines, after the M's released Carl Everett this year they rotated the DH among several different players to give them a day off of playing the field. I'd imagine there are more teams out there that do something similar.
As with a quote above for pitchers not hitting that 99% can't then it stands to reason that a high % of DH can't field, probably someone will know but I'd like to see how many games a recognised DH actually gets to field not counting inter league.
ukhotstove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:05 PM   #15
ukhotstove
Hall Of Famer
 
ukhotstove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: North of England Gods Country
Posts: 7,175
Quote:
Originally Posted by imation
Dumb response because your reason for not having the DH was even dumber.
What's dumb about knowing that the NL the none DH league as probably the greater managers tactical wise managing in it, part from Dusty Baker that is, oh by the way what was your reason for having the DH I missed it hmm chicks dig the long ball ?
ukhotstove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:08 PM   #16
imation
Major Leagues
 
imation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by ukhotstove
What's dumb about knowing that the NL the none DH league as probably the greater managers tactical wise managing in it, part from Dusty Baker that is, oh by the way what was your reason for having the DH I missed it hmm chicks dig the long ball ?
The reason is quite simple. Pitchers can't hit. That makes it easier for NL managers if you ask me. Hmm, should we pitch to this number 8 hitter or walk him and pitch to the pitcher. Sounds like an easy choice for me. The only way it makes tatics any easier is with double switching. Which is something that needs to go away any way. It is an unneccesary head ache that has been solved by the American League.
__________________


imation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 12:11 PM   #17
CBL-Commish
All Star Starter
 
CBL-Commish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,999
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom the Fish
"It robbed the game of its straegic possibilities in the late innings and turned every pitcher in the league into half a ballplayer.
Yea, but before the DH pitchers were only 52% of a ballplayer.

I never understood how hitting .089 with 44 Ks in 56 at bats made you a more complete player.

Most of the "straegic possibilities" that were eliminated were of the form: "Losing by two runs, .109 hitter coming up... yea... you know... I guess I'll pinch hit."
__________________
For the best in O's news: Orioles' Hangout.com
CBL-Commish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 04:35 PM   #18
blgoblue2
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Walled Lake, Michigan Member #13775
Posts: 886
baseball is a 9-man game
blgoblue2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 04:37 PM   #19
abailey3313
Hall Of Famer
 
abailey3313's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,718
I like the DH if for no other reason than it differenciates the two leagues.
__________________
abailey3313 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2006, 05:09 PM   #20
Le Grande Orange
Hall Of Famer
 
Le Grande Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Melo
The DH was instituted by the AL for one reason: The AL was inferior to the NL at the time and AL attendance was lagging behind NL attendance. The DH was a gimmick used to draw interest to the AL and put fannies in the seats.
The irony there is the DH was first proposed as early as the 1920s, and in that case it was favoured by the NL and rejected by the AL.
Le Grande Orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2024 Out of the Park Developments