Quote:
Originally Posted by Sweed
This.
I think we've had this discussion in a previous version? Didn't something change to make the draft "look" better with higher potentials to appease some that said it wasn't "fun" with realistic ratings? Of course for balance this, I think, leads to more high potential players having to bust? But if it's fun drafting them so I guess that's ok. 
Stick to your guns, there's nothing wrong with portraying something in a realistic way. |
Which I wouldn't argue with if there were 30 players with potential of 3 stars or better but it re evaluated on an obviously different basis. We are talking about the exact same players involved where suddenly we went from just over 10% of the draft having above average "potential" to less than 5%