Inaccurate top 100 prospects

jfb8300 · 05-10-2018, 08:57 AM

The top 4 pitchers are all undrafted scrubs.

In the case of Gauff, his individual history says "named #1 prospects" in April 2158. Current year is 2161. He was never renamed to the list. Additionally, he was released 1 month after being named #1 because his ratings are so poor (prior to being signed by his current team)

In each case, they were all undrafted and none show good ratings at any point in their history. What is going on?

Matt Arnold · 05-10-2018, 09:49 AM

I haven't seen this issue before. I take it you're not using dynamic prospect lists, correct?

It may be helpful to see your league files (http://support.ootpdevelopments.com/...p-developments) in order to see why those players are stuck at the top of the report.

Matt Arnold · 05-10-2018, 09:49 AM

I haven't seen this issue before. I take it you're not using dynamic prospect lists, correct?

It may be helpful to see your league files (http://support.ootpdevelopments.com/...p-developments) in order to see why those players are stuck at the top of the report.

jfb8300 · 05-11-2018, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt Arnold

I haven't seen this issue before. I take it you're not using dynamic prospect lists, correct?

It may be helpful to see your league files (http://support.ootpdevelopments.com/...p-developments) in order to see why those players are stuck at the top of the report.

Should be up there now under my username. And yes, using an annual prospect list.

Matt Arnold · 05-11-2018, 11:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfb8300

Should be up there now under my username. And yes, using an annual prospect list.

Hi, there appears to be a problem in the zipfile you uploaded. Can you try uploading only the world.dat file from the save (you can either zip that file or rename it to like world-jfb8300, for example)? Thanks

jfb8300 · 05-12-2018, 08:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt Arnold

Hi, there appears to be a problem in the zipfile you uploaded. Can you try uploading only the world.dat file from the save (you can either zip that file or rename it to like world-jfb8300, for example)? Thanks

jfb8300_world.dat

No longer saved at the same spot, but the issue appears still there.

HerbD · 05-12-2018, 09:08 AM

Check the batting ratings for those guys. I had a pitcher that looked like a scrub at the top of my prospect list and it turned out he had great batting potential. He was a two way player listed as a pitcher but his real skills were as a hitter.

Matt Arnold · 05-14-2018, 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfb8300

jfb8300_world.dat

No longer saved at the same spot, but the issue appears still there.

Thanks! Yes, it appears there was a bug where some players were so bad that values basically went crazy with them.

05-12-2018, 09:08 AM	#7
HerbD All Star Reserve Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Indiana Posts: 854	Check the batting ratings for those guys. I had a pitcher that looked like a scrub at the top of my prospect list and it turned out he had great batting potential. He was a two way player listed as a pitcher but his real skills were as a hitter. __________________

05-10-2018, 08:57 AM	#1
jfb8300 Minors (Double A) Join Date: Apr 2012 Posts: 134	Inaccurate top 100 prospects The top 4 pitchers are all undrafted scrubs. In the case of Gauff, his individual history says "named #1 prospects" in April 2158. Current year is 2161. He was never renamed to the list. Additionally, he was released 1 month after being named #1 because his ratings are so poor (prior to being signed by his current team) In each case, they were all undrafted and none show good ratings at any point in their history. What is going on? Attached Images Last edited by jfb8300; 05-10-2018 at 09:25 AM.

05-10-2018, 09:49 AM	#2
Matt Arnold OOTP Developer Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 14,143	I haven't seen this issue before. I take it you're not using dynamic prospect lists, correct? It may be helpful to see your league files (http://support.ootpdevelopments.com/...p-developments) in order to see why those players are stuck at the top of the report.