Home | Webstore
Latest News: OOTP 25 Available - FHM 10 Available - OOTP Go! Available

Out of the Park Baseball 25 Buy Now!

  

Go Back   OOTP Developments Forums > Prior Versions of Our Games > Out of the Park Baseball 14 > OOTP 14 - Historical Simulations

OOTP 14 - Historical Simulations Discuss historical simulations and their results in this forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-20-2014, 02:19 PM   #1
Trebro
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
Costs to Build 19th Century Stadiums?

Hi All,

Does anyone know if there's anywhere that can give at least a little detailing on what the costs were to build a new ballpark in the 1870s/80s/90s?

I was able to find out Brooklyn paid $13,000 in 1883, Boston paid $75,000 for a massive expansion in late 1880s, and that apparently by around 1900, Brooklyn paid a total of $100,000 to move its team into a new place, but that's very sketchy.

Any help would be appreciated, even if it's just one or two more data points for when I want to edit team funds to deduct for giving them a new park.

Thanks!
Trebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 03:32 PM   #2
canadiancreed
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
Blog Entries: 1
Baker Bowl - 80,000
Sportsman's Park - 300,000

Might be a bit later then you'd like, most of these were 1910's:

Fenway - 650,000
Hilltop Park - 200,000
Wirgley Field - 250,000
Ebbetts Field - 750,000
Forbes Field - 1 to 2 milllion
Griffith Stadium - 100,000
__________________
PT21



PT22


Last edited by canadiancreed; 03-20-2014 at 03:41 PM.
canadiancreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 03:59 PM   #3
Trebro
All Star Reserve
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 753
Blog Entries: 1
That actually helps a lot, because it shows how fast the costs increased, and eventually, I will be into the early 20th Century. It's really amazing to think about the fact that the Pirates dropped a cool million plus in pre-WW1 dollars for Forbes Field!
Trebro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 04:36 PM   #4
canadiancreed
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
Blog Entries: 1
Ya that one was a bit WTF when I saw that. Like Ebbetts made sense, as ti was known for being opulant, but that? Wild.

Personally I'd dig around wikipedia more, seems to have decent resources for cost.
__________________
PT21



PT22

canadiancreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 05:59 PM   #5
joefromchicago
Hall Of Famer
 
joefromchicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,630
I'd be dubious of some of those numbers. For instance, it's very unlikely that the original Sportsman's Park cost $300,000, even though it was part of what might be termed today an "amusement complex." $300,000 in 1881 would be something like $6 or $7 million today, and that would be for a simple wooden grandstand. More likely, that figure is for the conversion of the park in 1909, when the first steel-and-concrete stand was built.

In general, I'd estimate the cost of a brand-new park in the 19th century at around $75,000. That would cover not only the construction of the stands but also the purchase of the land. Prices went up when teams replaced wooden parks with steel-and-concrete structures, which started in 1909 with Forbes Field and Shibe Park.
joefromchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 06:42 PM   #6
Le Grande Orange
Hall Of Famer
 
Le Grande Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,386
A couple of points to remember about the wooden parks of the 19th century: (1) their seating capacities were fairly low; and (2) they burned down with alarming regularity. It was this fire issue which led to the (mostly) fire-proof steel and concrete parks of the early 20th century (which also allowed higher seating capacities).
Le Grande Orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2014, 06:44 PM   #7
canadiancreed
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
Blog Entries: 1
Quote:
Originally Posted by joefromchicago View Post
I'd be dubious of some of those numbers. For instance, it's very unlikely that the original Sportsman's Park cost $300,000, even though it was part of what might be termed today an "amusement complex." $300,000 in 1881 would be something like $6 or $7 million today, and that would be for a simple wooden grandstand. More likely, that figure is for the conversion of the park in 1909, when the first steel-and-concrete stand was built.
Well ti is Wikipedia after all. Although I agree it would have been nice to cite their sources.
__________________
PT21



PT22

canadiancreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 11:17 AM   #8
joefromchicago
Hall Of Famer
 
joefromchicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Grande Orange View Post
A couple of points to remember about the wooden parks of the 19th century: (1) their seating capacities were fairly low; and (2) they burned down with alarming regularity. It was this fire issue which led to the (mostly) fire-proof steel and concrete parks of the early 20th century (which also allowed higher seating capacities).
Another thing to remember is just how fast some of these ballparks were built. Work on Weeghman Field (later Wrigley Field) started at the beginning of March, 1914, and the park was ready for the home opener on April 23, less than two months later. Granted, that was just a grandstand down the foul lines - no upper deck and no bleachers. Still, that was fairly typical for the times. After a fire in 1911, the Polo Grounds was rebuilt with a double-decked steel-and-concrete grandstand in about two months.
joefromchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 11:37 AM   #9
canadiancreed
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 11,660
Blog Entries: 1
Compare that with the Skydome that took something like four years to finish. Crazy eh?
__________________
PT21



PT22

canadiancreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 01:54 PM   #10
joefromchicago
Hall Of Famer
 
joefromchicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 3,630
It's amazing what one can achieve with cheap labor and lax building codes
joefromchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 04:41 PM   #11
BaseballMan
Hall Of Famer
 
BaseballMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,241
Werent some of the early fields just basically converted cow pastures with roped fences?
BaseballMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 05:44 PM   #12
Le Grande Orange
Hall Of Famer
 
Le Grande Orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Up There
Posts: 15,386
Quote:
Originally Posted by BaseballMan View Post
Werent some of the early fields just basically converted cow pastures with roped fences?
Basically, yes. But the organizers soon realized in order to maximize profit they needed a way to keep non-paying viewers out. Hence the move towards enclosed parks.


A good book on baseball parks is Phil Lowry's Green Cathedrals. A great web site resource—which includes overhead diagrams of ballparks in their various stages of growth—is Clem's Baseball. Another site worth a look is Ballparks.com. It not only has info on baseball stadiums, but also stadiums used for basketball, football, and hockey.
Le Grande Orange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2014, 07:18 PM   #13
RchW
Hall Of Famer
 
RchW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The big smoke
Posts: 15,628
Quote:
Originally Posted by Le Grande Orange View Post
Basically, yes. But the organizers soon realized in order to maximize profit they needed a way to keep non-paying viewers out. Hence the move towards enclosed parks.


A good book on baseball parks is Phil Lowry's Green Cathedrals. A great web site resource—which includes overhead diagrams of ballparks in their various stages of growth—is Clem's Baseball. Another site worth a look is Ballparks.com. It not only has info on baseball stadiums, but also stadiums used for basketball, football, and hockey.
Yeah Clem's is pretty good. Take a look at the alternate field set up of Fenway. Was this ever a serious proposal?
__________________
Cheers

RichW

#stopthestupid

“Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition …There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.” Frank Wilhoit
RchW is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:32 PM.

 

Major League and Minor League Baseball trademarks and copyrights are used with permission of Major League Baseball. Visit MLB.com and MiLB.com.

Officially Licensed Product – MLB Players, Inc.

Out of the Park Baseball is a registered trademark of Out of the Park Developments GmbH & Co. KG

Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc.

Apple, iPhone, iPod touch and iPad are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries.

COPYRIGHT © 2023 OUT OF THE PARK DEVELOPMENTS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

 

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright © 2020 Out of the Park Developments